Journals / İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Our clinical approach to the tongue lesions: 123 cases

Dil lezyonlarına klinik yaklaşımımız:123 olgu

Pages
55–59
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our aim is to emphasize that all tongue masses is not cancer, if appropriate early treatment protocol is planned to patients diagnosed with cancer, survival and quality of life would be better compared with delayed cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, the hystopathology of tongue biopsies taken from suspicious lesions reviewed and tongue cancer patients treatment modalities and results are presented together.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Between January 2001 and January 2010 the tongue masses detected 123 patients histopathologic results of biopsy materials were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our aim is to emphasize that all tongue masses is not cancer, if appropriate early treatment protocol is planned to patients diagnosed with cancer, survival and quality of life would be better compared with delayed cases.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, the hystopathology of tongue biopsies taken from suspicious lesions reviewed and tongue cancer patients treatment modalities and results are presented together. Material and Method: Between January 2001 and January 2010 the tongue masses detected 123 patients histopathologic results of biopsy materials were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment modalities and follow-up results of operated 27 patients in 35 patients with a diagnosis of cancer were evaluated.Findings: The histopathologic results of 123 patients with suspicious tongue lesions, have been reported as; follows 34 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 clear cell carcinoma, 15 pyogenic granulomas, 14 papillomas, 14 acanthosis parakeratosis, 13 ulcerous-chronic inflammation, 12 hemangiomas, 9 Irritation fibroma, 5 fibroepiteliyal polyp, 2 pseudoepiteliyal hyperplasia, 2 neuromas, 1 fibrovascular granulation tissue and 1 rabhdomyom. Twentyseven of the 35 patients who have been diagnosed with cancer operated in our clinic. Six patients (advanced stage) were evaluated as inoperable. Two patients refused surgery and referred to medical oncology. The types of glossectomy and neck dissection selected according to the condition of tumor, which are appropriate, as histopathologically diagnosed cancer patients. All patients were followed postoperative 12-108 months (median 24 months). Conclusion: The rapid spread tongue cancers; can be easily detected at early stages and metastases to the neck. As a result of an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment at an early stage in cancer surgery has the right proportions with the life quality. Our aim is to emphasize that all tongue masses is not cancer, if appropriate early treatment protocol is planned to patients diagnosed with cancer, survival and quality of life would be better compared with delayed cases.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, dilin kuşkulu lezyonlarından alınan biyopsilerin histopatolojilerinin gözden geçirildi ve dil kanserli hastaların tedavi yöntemleri ve sonuçları geriye dönük incelendi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2001 ile 2011 arasında dilde kitle tespit edilen 123 hastadan alınan biyopsilerin histopatolojik sonuçları geriye dönük olarak gözden geçirilmiştir. Kanser tanısı alan 35 hastadan ameliyat olan 27 hastanın tedavi yaklaşım ve sonuçları değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: 123 kuşkulu dil lezyonu biyopsilerin histopatolojik değerlendirme sonuçlarında; yassı hücreli karsinom (34 olgu), berrak hücreli karsinom (1 olgu) ve geri kalan 88 olguda çeşitli benin patolojilerin başında piyojenik granülom (15 olgu ), papillom ve akantoz parakeratoz (14er olgu), kronik ülseröz-yangı (13 olgu), hemanjiom (12 olgu) sonuçlanmıştır. Kanser tanısı alan 35 hastanın 27’si kliniğimizde opere edilmiştir. Altı hasta inoperabl (ileri evre) olarak değerlendirildi. İki hasta operasyonu kabul etmedi ve Tıbbi Onkolojiye yönlendirildi. Histopatolojik olarak kanser tanısı alan hastalara tümörün durumuna göre glossektomi tipleri ve boyun diseksiyonu girişimlerinden uygun olanlar seçildi. Hastalarımız 12-108 ay (ortalama 24 ay) izlendi. Sonuç: Erken dönemde kolay tespit edilebilen dil kanserlerinin hızla yayılması ve boyuna metastaz yapması söz konusudur. Kanser cerrahisindeki erken dönemde konulan doğru tanı ve yapılacak uygun tedavinin yaşam kalitesi ve süresi üzerinde çok olumlu etkileri vardır. Dilde rastlanılan her kitlenin kanser olmadığı, kanser tanısı alan hastaların ise erken tedavi protokolü ile yaklaşılması durumunda, yaşam süresi ve kalitesinin geç kalınmış vakalara göre yüzgüldürücü derecede artabileceğini vurgulamaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇUKUROVA, İ., GÜMÜŞSOY, M., YAZ, A., BAYOL, Ü., YİĞİTBAŞI, O. G. (2011). Our clinical approach to the tongue lesions: 123 cases. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 55–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/268421

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Myers EN, Simental AA. Cancer of the oral cavity. In: Myers EN, Suen YJ, Myers NJ, Hanna EYN editors. Cancer of the head and neck. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. p. 279-321
  2. Newman AN. Carcinoma of the tongue in persons younger than 30 years of age. Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109: 302-9
  3. Baker SR. Malignant neoplasms of the oral cavity. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Schuller DE, editors. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1993. p. 1248-1305
  4. Calcaterra TC., Juillard GJF, Blackwell KE. Oral Cavity and Oropharynx İn: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Schuller DE, editors. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. 2nd ed, St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1993. p. 1248- 1305
  5. Lindberg R. Distrubition of cervical lymph node metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratorydigestive tracts. Cancer 1972; 29: 1446-8 6. Batsakis J. Tumors of the head and neck: clinical and patological consideration. 2nd ed, Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1979
  6. Werning JW, Byers RM, Novas MA, et al: Preoperative assessment for and outcomes of mandibular conservation surgery. Head Neck 2001.23:1024-1030
  7. Piollet H, Lofkin R, Steckel RJ, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish tumor persistence from delayed fibrosis in carcinoma of the tongue and flor of mouth. Ann Otholl Rhinol Laryngol 1990.99:753-755
  8. Wein RO, Weber RS. Malignant neoplasms of the oral cavity. In: Cummings CW, Flint PW, Harker LA editors. Cummings otolaryngology head and neck surgery. 4 th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. p. 1578-1618
  9. Najeeb T. Clinicopathological presentation of tongue cancers and early cancer treatment, J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006. Mar;16(3):179-82 11. Anderson HE. Cercvical metastases İn. Close LE, Larson DL, Shah JP, editors. Essentials of head and neck oncology. Ch 24, New York: Thieme, 1998; 256-65
  10. Krita T, Okabe S, Izumo T, et al. Risk factors fort he postoperative local recurrence of tongue carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52(2): 149-54.