Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2010 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 4

A multifactorial analysis of reconstruction methods applied after total gastrectomy

Total gastrektomilerden sonra uygulanan rekonstrüksiyon metodlarının multifaktöriyel analizi

Pages
126–131
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that reconstruction without pouch was performed in 22 cases and with pouch in 9 cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reconstruction methods applied after total gastrectomy in terms of postoperative symptomology and nutrition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 31 patients who underwent total gastrectomy due to gastric cancer in 2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that reconstruction without pouch was performed in 22 cases and with pouch in 9 cases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reconstruction methods applied after total gastrectomy in terms of postoperative symptomology and nutrition. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 31 patients who underwent total gastrectomy due to gastric cancer in 2. Clinic of General Surgery, SSK Ankara Training Hospital. 6 different reconstruction methods were used and analyzed in terms of age, sex and postoperative complications. One from esophagus and two biopsy specimens from jejunum were taken through upper gastrointestinal endoscopy from all cases, and late period morphological and microbiological changes were examined. Postoperative weight change, dumping symptoms, reflux esophagitis, solid/liquid dysphagia, early satiety, postprandial pain, diarrhea and anorexia were assessed. Results: Of 31 patients,18 were males and 13 females; the youngest one was 33 years old, while the oldest- 69 years old. It was found that reconstruction without pouch was performed in 22 cases and with pouch in 9 cases. Early satiety, postprandial pain, dumping symptoms, diarrhea and anemia were found most commonly in cases with reconstruction without pouch. The rate of bacterial colonization of the jejunal mucosa was identical in both groups. Reflux esophagitis was most commonly seen in omega esophagojejunostomy (EJ), while the least-in Roux-en-Y, Tooley and Tanner 19 EJ. Conclusion: Reconstruction with pouch performed after total gastrectomy is still a preferable method. (The Medical Bulletin of Haseki 2010; 48:126-31)

Özet

Amaç: Total gastrektomi gastrik kanserlerde ve lenfomalarda, akut mukozal eroziv lezyonlarda, Zollinger-Ellison sendromunda veya ciddi travmatik yaralanmalarda kimi zaman uygulanabilmektedir. Bu çalıflmada amaç total gastrektomi sonrası uygulanan pofllu ve poflsuz rekonstrüksiyon yöntemlerinin postoperatif semptomatoloji ve nütrisyon açısından irdelenmesidir. Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalıflma SSK Ankara Eğitim Hastanesi 2.Genel Cerrahi kliniğinde mide tümörü nedeniyle total gastrektomi yapılan, lokal nüksü ve metastazı olmayan 31 hasta üzerinde yapıldı. Bu hastalara uygulanan 6 farklı rekonstrüksiyon tipi, yafl, cinsiyet, tümör lokalizasyonu, tümörün histopatolojik tipi ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar açısından incelendi. Tüm olgulara üst G‹S endoskopisi ile özefagustan bir ve jejunumdan iki adet biyopsi alınarak geç dönem morfolojik ve mikrobiyolojik değiflimler arafltırıldı. Postoperatif kilo değişimi, dumping semptomları, reflü özefajit, sıvı/katı gıda disfajisi, erken doyma hissi, postprandial ağrı, diyare ve anoreksi sorgulandı. Bulgular: Hastaların 18’i erkek, 13’ü kadındı. En genç hasta 33 yaşında, en yaşlı hasta ise 69 yaşında idi. Ortalama yaş 55.3 olarak saptandı. 22 olguya poşsuz, 9 olguya poşlu rekonstrüksiyon yapıldığı saptandı. Erken doyma, postprandial ağrı, dumping semptomları, anemi ve diyare en sık poşsuz rekonstrüksiyonlarda saptandı. Jejunal bakteriyel kolonizasyon oranı her iki grupta benzer bulundu. Reflü özefajit en sık omega özefagojejunostomi (ÖJ)'de, en az Roux-en-Y, Tooley ve Tanner 19 ÖJ’de saptandı. Sonuç: Total gastrektomiden sonra poşlu rekonstrüksiyon yöntemleri postoperatif erken ve geç dönemdeki avantajları nedeniyle hala tercih edilebilir niteliktedir. (Haseki Tıp Bülteni 2010; 48:126-31)

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKAŞIK, O., MISIRLIOĞLU, M., İŞBİLİR, M. (2010). A multifactorial analysis of reconstruction methods applied after total gastrectomy. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 4, 126–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/268024

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Allum WH, Powell DJ, McConkey CC, Fielding JWL. Gastric cancer: A 25-year review. Br J Surg 1989;76:535-40. [Abstract] / [PDF] 2. Park DJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH, Yang HK, Lee KU, Choe KJ. Predictors of operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2005;92:1099-102.[Abstract] / [PDF] 3. Dicken BJ, Bigam DL, Cass C, Mackey JR, Joy AA, Hamilton SM. Gastric adenocarcinoma. Review and considerations for future directions. Ann Surg 2005;241:27-39.[Abstract] / [Full Text] / [PDF] 4. Zonca P, Maly T, Herokova J, Kvetensky M, Halva Z. Reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Bratisl Lek List 2002;103:414-7. [PDF] 5. Qin XY, Lei Y, Liu FL. Effects of two methods of reconstruction of digestive tract after total gastrectomy on gastrointestinal motility in rats. World J Gastroenterol 2003;9:1051-53. [Abstract] / [Full Text] / [PDF] 6. Kono K, Iizuka H, Sekikawa T, et al. Improved quality of life with jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Am J Surg 2003;185:150-4. [Abstract] / [Full Text] / [PDF] 7. Smedh U, Hansson L, Ekman R, Zilling T. Jejunal pouch reconstruction but not preservation of duodenal passage after total gastrectomy reduces plasma cholecystokinin and pancreatic polypeptide long term in pigs. ‹n Vivo 2009;23:93-8. [Abstract] / [Full Text] / [PDF] 8. Braga M, Zuliani W, Foppa L, Di Carlo V, Cristallo M. Food intake and nutritional status after total gastrectomy: results of a nutritional follow-up. Br J Surg 1988;75:477-80. [Abstract] 9. Olbe L, Lundell L. Intestinal function after total gastrectomy and possible consequences of gastric replacement. World J Surg 1987;11:713-9. [Abstract] / [PDF] 10. Armbrecht U, Lundell L, Lindstedt G, Stockbruegger RW. Causes of malabsorption after total gastrectomy with Rouxen- Y reconstruction. Acta Chir Scand 1988;154:37- 41.[Abstract] / [Full Text] 11. Pellegrini C, Deveney C, Patti M, Lewin M, Way L. Intestinal transit of food after total gastrectomy and Roux-Y esophagojejunostomy. Am J surg 1986;151:117-25.[Abstract] 12. Bradley EL, Isaacs J, Hersh T, Davidson ED, Millika W. Nutritional consequences of total gastrectomy. Ann Surg 1975;182:415-29. [Abstract] / [PDF] 13. Cristallo M, Braga M, Agape D, et al. Nutritional status, function of the small intestine and jejunal morphology after total gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1986;163:225-30. [Abstract] 14. Gustavsson S, Kelly KA. Total gastrectomy for benign disease. Surg Clin North Am 1987;67:539-50. [Abs