Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2012 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Endoscopic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed at the gastroduodenoscopy unit of a secondary level state hospital Our gastroduodenoscopy results

İkinci basamak bir devlet hastanesinde gastroduodenoskopi Ünitesinde tanı konulan olgularının endoskopik ve klinik özellikleri

Pages
131–135
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: It is obvious that gastroduodenoscopy will remain useful for many years in the diagnosis of lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Our aim was to determine the demographic characteristics of patients, who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy in a secondary level state hospital and to compare the results with the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We investigated and classified gastroduodenoscopy results, age, sex, complaints, clinical characteristics and type of anesthesia of 499 patients who were admitted to Sakarya Akyazi State Hospital Endoscopy unit between 2011 and 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: It is obvious that gastroduodenoscopy will remain useful for many years in the diagnosis of lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Our aim was to determine the demographic characteristics of patients, who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy in a secondary level state hospital and to compare the results with the literature. Methods: We investigated and classified gastroduodenoscopy results, age, sex, complaints, clinical characteristics and type of anesthesia of 499 patients who were admitted to Sakarya Akyazi State Hospital Endoscopy unit between 2011 and 2012. Results: Most of the results of 499 patients included in this study were found to be compatible with the literature. Conclusion: It is obvious that gastroduodenoscopy will remain useful for many years in the diagnosis of lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Özet

Amaç: İkinci basamak bir devlet hastanesinde endoskopi ünitesinde gastroduodenoskopi yapılan hastaların demografik özellikleri ve gastroduodenoskopi sonuçlarının saptanması ve literatür ile karşılaştırılması. Yöntemler: 2011-2012 yıllarında Sakarya Akyazı Devlet Hastanesi Endoskopi Ünitesine başvuran 499 hastaya yapılan gastroduodenoskopinin sonuçları, hastaların yaşı, cinsiyeti, şikayeti ve hastaya uygulanan anestezi şekli incelenerek sınıflandırılmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 499 hastanın sonuçlarının çoğunun literatür ile uyumlu olduğu bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Üst gastrointestinal sistemdeki lezyonların tanısında gastroduodenoskopinin daha uzun yıllar boyunca yararlı bir tetkik olarak kullanılacağı aşikardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

FERLENGEZ, E., FERLENGEZ, A. G., ÇELİK, A., KADIOĞLU, H. (2012). Endoscopic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed at the gastroduodenoscopy unit of a secondary level state hospital Our gastroduodenoscopy results. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 131–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/268005

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Heikinnen MT, Pikkarainen PH, Takala JK, Rasanen HT, Eskelinen MJ, Julkunen RJ. Diagnostic methods in dyspepsia; the usefulness of upper abdominal ultrasound and gastroscopy. Scand J Prim Health Care 1997;15:82-6
  2. Loffeld RJ, Liberov B, Dekkers PE. The changing prevalence of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic diagnoses: a single-centre study, Journal of medicine Netherlands 2012;7 0:222-6
  3. Keefe EB. Sedation and analgesia for endoscopy. Gastroenterology 1995;108:932-4
  4. Bell GD. Review article: premedication and intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1990;4:103-22
  5. Assy N, Rosser BG, Grahame GR, Minuk GY. Risk of sedation for upper GI endoscopy exacerbating subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:690-4
  6. Bardhan KD, Morris P, Taylor PC, Hinchliffe RF, Harris PA. Intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: diazepam versus midazolam. Br Med J(Clin Res Ed) 1984;288:1046
  7. Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Lichtenstein DR, Jagannath S, Baron TH, et al. Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:815-26
  8. O'Connor KW, Jones S. Oxygen desaturation is common and clinically underappreciated during elective endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 1990;36(3 Suppl):2-4
  9. Lieberman DA, Wuerker CK, Katon RM. Cardiopulmonary risk of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation. Gastroenterology 1985;88:468-72
  10. Sharma VK, Nguyen CC, Crowell MD, Lieberman DA, de Garmo P, Fleischer DE. A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66(1):27-34
  11. Froehlich F, Schwizer W, Thorens J, Köhler M, Gonvers JJ, Fried M. Conscious sedation for gastroscopy: patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters. Gastroenterology 1995;108:697-704. 12. al-Atrakchi HA. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation: a prospective study of 2000 examinations. Gastrointest Endosc 1989;35:79-81
  12. De Gregorio BT, Poorman JC, Katon RM. Peroral ultrathin endoscopy in adult patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:303-6
  13. Tan CC, Freeman JG. Throat spray for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is quite acceptable to patients. Endoscopy 1996;28:277-82
  14. Solomon SA, Kajla VK, Banerjee AK. Can the elderly tolerate endoscopy without sedation? J R Coll Physicians Lond 1994;28:407-10
  15. Dhir V, Swar