Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2012 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Our results in patients with inguinal hernia in whom total extraperitoneal preperitoneal (Tepp) method has been used

Total ekstraperitoneal preperitoneal (Tepp) yöntemle kasık fıtığı onarımı uygulanan hastalardaki sonuçlarımız

Pages
119–121
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Return to an active life, duration of surgery, complication rates, and cosmetic results in TEPP were better than that in other techniques.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: TEPP (Total extraperitoneal preperitoneal) inguinal hernia repair is a laparoscopic technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Hospital records of 130 patients who underwent TEPP in Bezm-i Alem Valide Sultan Gureba Training and Research Hospital between January 2005 and January 2010 were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Return to an active life, duration of surgery, complication rates, and cosmetic results in TEPP were better than that in other techniques.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: TEPP (Total extraperitoneal preperitoneal) inguinal hernia repair is a laparoscopic technique. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of TEPP. Methods: Hospital records of 130 patients who underwent TEPP in Bezm-i Alem Valide Sultan Gureba Training and Research Hospital between January 2005 and January 2010 were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic characteristics, length of hospital stay, return to an active life, complications, and recurrence rates were determined. Results: The mean age was 41 years and 85% of the patients were male. Most of the patients had inguinal hernia type 3B according to Nyhus classification (92). Seven patients had 3C and, type 3A was found in 22 patients. Of the 130 patients, 9 had recurrence. The mean duration of surgery was 30 minutes and the mean length of hospital stay was 1.2 days. The most common complication was accumulation of fluid in the scrotum (24 patients). Major vascular injury, organ injury, and wound infection were not detected. There was no recurrence during 3-60-month-follow-up. Conclusion: Return to an active life, duration of surgery, complication rates, and cosmetic results in TEPP were better than that in other techniques.

Özet

Amaç: Kasık fıtığı onarımı genel cerrahi kliniklerinde en çok yapılan ameliyatlardan biridir. Teknolojide gelişmelere paralel olarak yapılan onarım teknikleri geçmişten günümüze çok değişmiş ve gelişmiştir. Geriye dönük yapılan bu çalışmadaki amacımız onarım tekniklerinden biri olan total ekstraperitonel preperitoneal (TEPP) yönteminin sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: 2005-2010 Ocak tarihleri arasında TEPP uygulanan toplam 130 hasta bu çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, hastanede yatış ve aktif hayata başlama süreleri, komplikasyonlar ve nüks değerlendirilmiştir. Operasyon esnasında açığa dönülenler, farklı bir laparoskopik teknik uygulananlar ve nüksün değerlendirilemediği hastalar çalışma dışı tutulmuştur. Bulgular: Ortalama yaş 41, erkek cinsiyet %85 idi. Nyhus kasık fıtığı tiplemesine göre en sık 92 hasta ile tip 3B bulundu, 22 hasta tip 3A ve 7 hasta tip 3C idi. 130 hasta içinde toplam 9 hastada nüks vardı. Ortalama operasyon süresi 30 dk, hastanede yatış süresi 1.2 gün, aktif hayata dönme 7 gün olarak bulundu. Komplikasyonlar içinde en sık 24 hasta ile skrotal sıvı birikimi görüldü. Büyük damar yaralanması, organ yaralanması, yara yeri enfeksiyonu tespit edilmedi. 3-60 aylık takip süresinde nüks tespit edilmedi. Sonuç: Aktif hayata dönme süresinin kısa, operasyon süresinin kabul edilebilir süre olması, komplikasyon oranlarının kasık fıtık onarımında kullanılan diğer tekniklere göre daha iyi ve kozmetik sonuçların daha istenilir olması TEPP yöntemini cerrahlar arasında kabul edilen bir yöntem olmasını sağlamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, A., ŞİMŞEK, A. Ç., FERLENGEZ, A. G., KAPLAN, İ., GÜZEY, D., FERLENGEZ, E., BİROL, S., ÇELİK, A. (2012). Our results in patients with inguinal hernia in whom total extraperitoneal preperitoneal (Tepp) method has been used. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 119–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/267967

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Celik AŞ, Memmi N, Celebi F, et al. Impact of slit and nonslit mesh technique on testicular perfusion and volume in the early and late postoperative period of the totally extraperitoneal preperitoneal technique in patients with inguinal hernia. Am J Surg 2009;198:287-91
  2. Ger R. The laparoscopic management of groin hernias. Contemp Surg1991;39:15-9
  3. Schultz L, Graber J, Pietrafitta J, Hickok D. Laser laparoscopic herniorraphy:a clinical trial preliminary results. J Laparoendosc Surg 1990;1:41-5
  4. Corbitt JD Jr. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991;1:23-5
  5. Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Salerno GM, Hart RO. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Clin North Am 1992;72:1109-24
  6. Nyhus LM. Individualization of hernia repair: a new area. Surgery 1993;114:1-2
  7. Wauschkuhn CA, Schwarz J, Boekeler U, Bittner R. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in bilateral hernia repair? Results of more than 2800 patients in comparison to literature. Surg Endosc 2010;24:3026-30
  8. Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, Praseedom RK. Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 2010;97:4-11
  9. Eklund A, Carlsson P, Rosenblad A, et al. Long-term costminimization analysis comparing laparoscopic with open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair Swedish Multicentre Trial of Inguinal Hernia Repair by Laparoscopy (SMIL) study group. Br J Surg 2010;97:765-71
  10. Crawford DL, Phillips EH. Preoperative Nyhus classification of inguinal hernias and type-related individual hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998;8:328
  11. Paily A, Thornton M. Chronic pain following a Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a clinical and legal dilemma. ANZ J Surg 2009;79:517-20
  12. Dickinson KJ, Thomas M, Fawole AS, Lyndon PJ, White CM. Predicting chronic post-operative pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 2008;12:597-601
  13. Evans MD, Williams GL, Stephenson BM. Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEPP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 2009;250:354-5
  14. Singh-Ranger D, Taneja T, Sroden P, Peters J. A rare complication following laparoscopic TEPP repair: case report and discussion of the literature. Hernia 2007;11:453-6
  15. Rink J, Ali A. Intestinal obstruction after totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. JSLS 2004;8:89-92
  16. Spaw AT, Ennis BW, Spaw