SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

The Incompetence of School Leaders in the U.S. Special Education

Okul Liderlerinin Birleşik Devletler Özel Eğitimindeki Yetersizliği

Kıvanç BOZKUŞ
Pages
63–68
Publication Date
2013-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Through a literature review, problems are scrutinized, and the roles that leaders should embrace are defined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:School leaders in the U.S. have difficulties providing students with disabilities with a quality education that complies with the needs of the children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Leaders' knowledge about including students with disabilities into general education settings consists of nothing but the legal requirements of the process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Through a literature review, problems are scrutinized, and the roles that leaders should embrace are defined.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:özel eğitim · liderlik · yetersizliği olan öğrenciler.

Abstract

School leaders in the U.S. have difficulties providing students with disabilities with a quality education that complies with the needs of the children. Leaders' knowledge about including students with disabilities into general education settings consists of nothing but the legal requirements of the process. Leadership preparation programs' main concern is keeping leaders away from legal sanctions of incompliance with laws that govern special education. The aim of the study is to understand the reasons of this situation which often results in various problems and to propose recommendations to leaders in overcoming their incompetency. Through a literature review, problems are scrutinized, and the roles that leaders should embrace are defined.

Özet

Birleşik Devletler ’deki okul liderleri, yetersizliği olan öğrencilere onların ihtiyaçlarıyla uyumlu ve nitelikli bir eğitim sağlama hususunda güçlük çekmektedirler. Liderlerin, yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin genel eğitim ortamlarına dahili hakkındaki bilgileri sürecin yasal gereklerinden ibarettir. Liderliğe hazırlık programlarının asıl kaygısı, liderleri özel eğitimle alakalı yasalara uymamaktan doğan yasal yaptırımlardan uzak tutmaktır. Çalışmanın amacı, sıkça çeşitli olumsuzluklarla sonuçlanan bu durumun nedenlerini anlamak ve liderlere yetersizlikleriyle başa çıkabilmeleri için öneriler sunmaktır. Alan yazın incelemesi ile sorunlar irdelenir ve liderlerin benimsemesi gereken roller belirtilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKUŞ, K. (2013). The Incompetence of School Leaders in the U.S. Special Education. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 63–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/265630

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Bays, D. A. (2004). Science in the schoolhouse: The critical role of the school leader. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37 (3), 256-261.
  2. Colarusso, R. P., & O’Rourke, C. M. (2003). Special education for all teachers. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing. Crockett, J. B. (2002). Special education's role in preparing responsive leaders for inclusive schools. Remedial and Special Education, 23 (3), 157-168.
  3. DiPaola, M., Moran, M. T., & Thomas, C. W. (2004). School principals and special education: Creating the context for academic success. Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(1), 1-10.
  4. Goor, M. B. (1995). Leadership for special education administration: A case-based approach. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace. Hehir, T. (2005). New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Hoy,W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2000). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Ideadata.org. Data retrieved from https: //www.ideadata.org/TABLES33RD/AR_1-1.xls and https: //www.ideadata.org/tables33rd/AR_C-1.xls LaNear, J., & Frattura, E. (2007). Getting the stories straight: allowing different voices to tell an ‘effective history’ of special education law in the United States. Education and the Law, 19(2), 87-109.
  5. McHatton, P. A., Boyer, N. R., Shaunessy, E., & Terry, P. M. (2010). Principals’ perceptions of preparation and practice in gifted and special education content: are we doing enough? Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5(1), 1-22.
  6. McLaughlin, M.J. (2009). What every principal needs to know about special education (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  7. Monteith, D. S. (1998). Special education administration training for rural minority school leaders: A funded proposal. In Coming together: Preparing for rural special education in the 21st century. Conference proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education. Murtadha-Watts, K., & Stoughton, E. (2004). Critical cultural knowledge in special education: Reshaping the responsiveness of school leaders. Focus On Exceptional Children, 37(2), 1-8.
  8. Ramanathan, A. (2008). Paved with good intentions: The federal role in the oversight and enforcement of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) and the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Teachers College Record