Journals / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2015 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Candida albicans biofilm formation on different soft lining materials

Farklı yumuşak astar materyallerinin Candida albicans biyofilm formasyonu açısından değerlendirilmesi

Pages
19–25
Publication Date
2015-02-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Smooth surfaces were found to reduce the biofilm formation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate Candida albicans biofilm formation on soft liners prepared against two surfaces with different properties.MATERIALS AND METHOD: Four soft liners (Molloplast B, Permafleks, Elite-soft, Ufi Gel P) were prepared against glass or dental plaster surfaces (5x5x2 mm; n=5).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Candida albicans ATCC 10231 was grown in Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB) at 37 °C for 24 h.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Smooth surfaces were found to reduce the biofilm formation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyofilm · Kandida albikans · Polidimetilsiloksanlar

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate Candida albicans biofilm formation on soft liners prepared against two surfaces with different properties.MATERIALS AND METHOD: Four soft liners (Molloplast B, Permafleks, Elite-soft, Ufi Gel P) were prepared against glass or dental plaster surfaces (5x5x2 mm; n=5). The surface roughness and contact angle of the soft liner specimens were measured. Candida albicans ATCC 10231 was grown in Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB) at 37 °C for 24 h. For biofilm formation, the specimens were incubated in polystrene wells together with fresh SDB and the C. albicans culture at 37 °C for 48 h. The specimens were stained with 0.1% crystal violet and dehydrated at 65 °C. The quantification of the C. albicans biofilm formation was performed spectrophotometrically. Comparison of the surface roughness, contact angle and biofilm formation between the materials was done using one way ANOVA and Tukey tests. Correlation between surface roughness, contact angle and biofilm formation on the specimens prepared against glass or plaster surfaces was performed using Pearson correlation analysis.RESULTS: Specimens prepared against plaster showed significantly higher surface roughness, contact angle and biofilm formation values in comparison to those prepared against glass surface (p<0.05). Among the specimens prepared against the dental plaster surface, the highest and the lowest biofilm formation values were observed in the Ufi Gel P and Molloplast B specimens, respectively. Among the specimens prepared against the glass surface, the greatest biofilm formation was shown for Ufi Gel P. There was no correlation between the surface properties (surface roughness and contact angle) and the amount of biofilm formation for the soft liner materials tested in this study (p>0.05).CONCLUSION: Although the soft liners tested in this study had similar surface topographic properties, they showed different amounts of C. albicans biofilm formation. Smooth surfaces were found to reduce the biofilm formation.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmada iki farklı yüzey yapısına göre hazırlanan yumuşak astar materyallerinde Candida albicans biyofilm oluşumunun değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Dört yumuşak astar materyali (Molloplast B, Permafleks, Elite-Soft, Ufi Gel P) cam veya alçı yüzeyler üzerinde hazırlandı (5x5x2 mm; n=5). Tüm örneklerin yüzey pürüzlülükleri ve temas açıları ölçüldü. Candida albicans ATCC 10231 Sabouraud dextrose besiyeri (SDB) içerisinde 37 °C’de 24 saat süresince çoğaltıldı. Ardından, biyofilm oluşumu için örnekler polistren kuyucuklarda, önceden elde edilen Candida albicans kültürü ve taze SDB ilavesiyle 37 °C’de 48 saat süresince enkübe edildi. Örnekler %0.1 kristal viyole solüsyonu ile boyanarak 65 °C’de kurumaya bırakıldı. Biyofilm oluşumu spektrofotometrik yöntemle incelendi. Test edilen materyallerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü, temas açıları ve biyofilm formasyonlarının karşılaştırılması oneway ANOVA ve Tukey testi ile yapıldı. Cam veya alçı yüzeylerde hazırlanan örneklerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü, temas açıları ve biyofilm oluşumu arasındaki korelasyon Pearson korelasyon analizi ile incelendi. BULGULAR: Alçı yüzeyinde hazırlanan örneklerde yüzey pürüzlülüğü, temas açısı ve biyofilm oluşumu, cam üzerinde hazırlananlara göre istatistiksel olarak daha fazla bulundu (p 0.05). SONUÇ: Test edilen yumuşak astar materyalleri, yüzey topografik özellikleri açısından benzer olsalar da farklı miktarlarda Candida albicans biyofilm oluşumu gösterdiler. Düz yüzeylerin biyofilm oluşumunu azalttığı gözlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKIŞ, D., AKAY, C., ERDÖNMEZ, D., DOĞAN, A. (2015). Evaluation of Candida albicans biofilm formation on different soft lining materials. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 19–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/265432

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Turgut M, Bolayır G, Doğan OM, Keskin S, Doğan A, Boztuğ A. Bond strength of a silicone soft lining material to poly(methyl methacrylate) resin treated with maleic anhydride and its terpolymers. J Adhes 2007;83:927-38.
  2. Sinobad D, Murphy WM, Huggett R, Brooks S. Bond strength and rupture properties of some soft denture liners. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:151-60.
  3. Karacaer Ö, Karaarslan A, Dogan A, Özenci H. Yumuşak astar materyallerinin Candida albicans üzerine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. GÜ Diş Hek Fak Der 1994;2:103-7. Doğan OM. Yumuşak astar materyallerin klinik endikasyonları. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2005;15:70-5.
  4. Braden M, Wright PS, Parker S. Soft lining materials--a review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1995;3:163-74.
  5. Bal BT, Yavuzyılmaz H. Yumuşak astar maddeleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2006;Suppl 1:53-60.
  6. Soygun K, Bolayır G, Dogan A, Demir H, Dogan M, Keskin S. Effect of surface treatments on tensile bond strength between a silicone soft liner and heat-cured denture base resin. J Adhes 2011;87:951-65. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' science of dental materials. 10th edn. Philadelphia: WB Sanders;1995.
  7. Demir H, Soygun K, Dogan A, Keskin S, Dogan OM, Bolayir G. Effect of maleic anhydride pretreatment on tensile bond strength of a silicone soft liner to a denture base polymer. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:481-7. Noort R. Introduction to dental materials, 2nd edn. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2002.
  8. Roth J, Albrecht V, Nitschke M, Bellmann C, Simon F, Zschoche S, et al. Surface functionalization of silicone rubber for permanent adhesion improvement. Langmuir 2008;24:12603-11.
  9. Mutluay MM, Oğuz S, Ørstavik D, Fløystrand F, Doğan A, Söderling E, et al. Experiments on in vivo biofilm formation and in vitro adhesion of Candida species on polysiloxane liners. Gerodontology 2010;27:283-91. Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC. Physico-chemical interactions in initial microbial adhesion and relevance for biofilm formation. Adv Dent Res 1997;11:24-32.
  10. Yerliyurt K, Nalbant D, Kalkancı A, Kuştimur S. İki farklı silikon esaslı yumuşak astar maddesinin zamana bağlı olarak yüzeylerinden izole edilen C. albicans hücrelerinde ALS1 adezyon geninin ekspresyonundaki değişimin incelenmesi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2012;4:9-21.
  11. Garcia LT, Jones JD. Soft liners. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:709- 20, vii. Nikawa H, Jin C, Makihira S, Egusa H, Hamada T, Kumagai H. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans on the surfaces of deteriorated soft denture lining materials caused b