SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2013 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets and tubes bonded with new fluoride releasing adhesive systems

Flor salan adeziv sistemler kullanılarak yapıştırılan ortodontik braket ve tüplerin bağlanma kuvvetlerinin incelenmesi

Mehmet Çağrı ULUSOY
Çağrı TÜRKÖZ
Burcu Baloş TUNCER
Cumhur TUNCER
Selin KALE VARLIK
Pages
54–8
Publication Date
2013-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings of the study, Clearfil S3 Bond Plus could be of greater advantage due to its greater bond strength.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strengths (SBS) of two new fluoride-releasing bonding systems with a conventional bonding system.MATERIALS AND METHOD: Fifty-one caries-free mandibular premolars and fifty-one mandibular molars were randomly divided into 3 groups of 17, and metal brackets and molar tubes were bonded.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group 1 (premolars) and Group 4 (molars) utilized conventional bonding with Transbond XT primer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings of the study, Clearfil S3 Bond Plus could be of greater advantage due to its greater bond strength.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bağlanma Kuvveti · Dental Adezivler · Flor Salan Yapıştırıcılar

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strengths (SBS) of two new fluoride-releasing bonding systems with a conventional bonding system.MATERIALS AND METHOD: Fifty-one caries-free mandibular premolars and fifty-one mandibular molars were randomly divided into 3 groups of 17, and metal brackets and molar tubes were bonded. Group 1 (premolars) and Group 4 (molars) utilized conventional bonding with Transbond XT primer. The teeth in Group 2 (premolars) and Group 5 (molars) were bonded using Clearfil S3 Bond Plus. Group 3 (premolars) and Group 6 (molars) were bonded using Opal Seal Kit. A universal testing machine was used to determine the SBS. Adhesive remaining after debonding was also assessed.RESULTS: Clearfil S3 Bond Plus demonstrated significantly greater SBS values than Transbond XT and Opal Seal Kit (p=0.014 and p=0.009, respectively) in premolars. For molars, Opal Seal Kit yielded the lowest SBS values among all tested adhesive systems (p<0.01). Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant differences in the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scores (χ2 = 6.92, p=0.23).CONCLUSION: All adhesives exhibited adequate SBS values, but molar tubes bonded with Opal Seal exhibited lower SBS values than those obtained for the conventional bonding system and Clearfil S3 Bond Plus. According to the findings of the study, Clearfil S3 Bond Plus could be of greater advantage due to its greater bond strength.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı flor salan iki yeni ortodontik yapıştırıcının ve geleneksel bir yapıştırıcının bağlanma kuvvetlerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: 51 adet çürüksüz alt küçük azı ve 51 adet çürüksüz alt büyük azı, 17’şer dişlik 3 grup oluşturacak şekilde rastgele bölünmüş ve braket ve tüpler yapıştırılmıştır. Grup 1 (küçük azı) ve Grup 4 (büyük azı) geleneksel olarak Transbond XT primer ile yapıştırılmıştır. Grup 2 (küçük azı) ve Grup 5 (büyük azı) Clearfil S3 Bond Plus ile yapıştırılmıştır. Grup 3 (küçük azı) ve Grup 6 (büyük azı) ise Opal Seal Kit kullanılarak yapıştırılmıştır. Bağlanma kuvvet değerleri, bilgisayar destekli universal test cihazı ile ölçülmüş ve artık adeziv miktarı değerlendirilmiştir.BULGULAR: Küçük azı grubunda Clearfil S3 Bond Plus, Transbond XT ve Opal Seal Kit’ten daha yüksek bağlanma kuvveti göstermiştir (sırasıyla p = 0.014 ve p = 0.009). Büyük azılar için ise Opal Seal Kit önemli düzeyde daha düşük bağlanma kuvveti göstermiştir (p<0.01). KruskalWallis testi, Artık Adeziv İndeksi (AAİ) skorlarında fark göstermemiştir (χ2 = 6.92, p = 0.23).SONUÇ: Bütün yapıştırıcılar yeterli bağlanma kuvvetini sağlamıştır; fakat Opal Seal Kit ile yapıştırılan büyük azılar daha düşük bağlanma kuvveti göstermiştir. Clearfil S3 Bond Plus grupları ise en yüksek bağlanma değerlerine sahiptirler.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUSOY, M. Ç., TÜRKÖZ, Ç., TUNCER, B. B., TUNCER, C., VARLIK, S. K. (2013). Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets and tubes bonded with new fluoride releasing adhesive systems. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 54–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/265365

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Zachrisson BU. Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and supporting structures during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1976;69:285-300.
  2. Talpur M, Cunningham SJ, Moles DR, Jones SP. The relationship between base dimensions, force to failure, and shear bond strengths of bondable molar tubes. Angle Orthod 2012;82:536-40.
  3. Millett DT, Glenny AM, Mattick CR, Hickman J, Mandall NA. Adhesives for fixed orthodontic bands. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:CD004485. Linklater RA, Gordon PH. Bond failure patterns in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:534-9.
  4. Imazato S, Kuramoto A, Takahashi Y, Ebisu S, Peters MC. In vitro antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of Clearfil Protect Bond. Dent Mater 2006;226:527-32.
  5. Korbmacher HM, Huck L, Kahl-Nieke B. Fluoride-releasing adhesive and antimicrobial self-etching primer effects on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2006;76:845-50.
  6. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8.
  7. Turgut MD, Attar N, Korkmaz Y, Gokcelik A. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded with flowable composites. Dent Mater J 2011;30:66-71.
  8. Minick GT, Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC. Bracket bond strengths of new adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:771-6.
  9. Attin R, Stawarczyk B, Keçik D, Knösel M, Wiechmann D, Attin T. Shear bond strength of brackets to demineralize enamel after different pretreatment methods. Angle Orthod 2012;82:56-61.
  10. Cehreli ZC, Kecik D, Kocadereli I. Effect of self-etching primer and adhesive formulations on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:573-9; quiz 625-6.
  11. Goracci C, Margvelashvili M, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a new self-adhering flowable resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:609-17.
  12. Ozoe R, Endo T, Abe R, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Initial shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to bleached teeth with a selfetching adhesive system. Quintessence Int 2012;43:e60-6. Arhun N, Arman A, Sesen C, Karabulut E, Korkmaz Y, Gokalp S. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with 3 self-etch adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:547-50.
  13. Attar N, Taner TU, Tülümen E, Korkmaz Y. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bo