Journals / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1

Prevalence and types of developmental enamel defects in primary teeth of preterm children

Prematüre doğmuş çocukların süt dişlerindeki gelişimsel mine defektlerinin görülme sıklığı ve tipleri

Pages
13–17
Publication Date
2020-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: This study showed that premature children had more DED than term-born children, and these defects were mostly observed in the maxillary incisors and observed as demarcated opacities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the prevalence and developmental enamel defect (DED) types in primary teeth in preterm-born with term-born children.Materials and Method: This study included 150 children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The children were divided into two groups as premature (n=75, mean age=7.1±2.9 year) and term-born (control group, n=75, mean age=7.6±2.5 year).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: This study showed that premature children had more DED than term-born children, and these defects were mostly observed in the maxillary incisors and observed as demarcated opacities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bebek · diş minesi · prematür

Abstract

Objective: To compare the prevalence and developmental enamel defect (DED) types in primary teeth in preterm-born with term-born children.Materials and Method: This study included 150 children. The children were divided into two groups as premature (n=75, mean age=7.1±2.9 year) and term-born (control group, n=75, mean age=7.6±2.5 year). In the clinical examination, DED and the defect type were recorded according to the modified DED index. Data were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-Square, Fisher's exact and t-tests.Results: DED was observed 34/75 (45.3%) in the premature group and 15/75 (20%) in the control group (p<0.01). DED was detected in 193 teeth. The prevalence of DED was higher in the premature group (n=148, 76.7%) than in the control group (n=45, 23.3%). DED was most commonly found in the maxillary incisors of the premature group and the maxillary molars of the control group. The DED types were found to be enamel opacity (demarcated white/cream opacity, demarcated yellow/brown opacity, diffuse opacity as lines, and diffuse patchy opacity) in 88.5% (n=131) teeth and enamel hypoplasia in 11.5% (n=17) teeth of the premature group, and as enamel hypoplasia in all teeth of the control group (n=45, 100%). Significantly more teeth in the premature group than in the control group exhibited demarcated white/cream opacity and demarcated yellow/brown opacity at the enamel (p<0.01). Conclusion: This study showed that premature children had more DED than term-born children, and these defects were mostly observed in the maxillary incisors and observed as demarcated opacities.

Özet

Amaç: Prematüre doğan çocukların süt dişlerinde izlenen gelişimsel mine defektlerinin (GMD) görülme sıklığı ve tiplerinin, normal doğum yaşında dünyaya gelmiş çocuklar ile karşılaştırılmasıdır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmaya 150 çocuk dahil edildi. Çocuklar, prematüre doğan (n=75, yaş=7.1±2.9 yıl) ve normal doğum yaşında doğmuş çocuklar (kontrol grubu, n=75, yaş=7.6±2.5 yıl) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. Klinik muayenede her iki grupta GMD olup olmadığı belirlendi. GMD belirlenen dişler, Modifiye GMD İndeksindeki tiplere göre sınıflandırıldı. Veriler Pearson ki-kare, Fisher'in kesin testi ve t-testi kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi.Bulgular: Prematüre grubunda 34/75 (%45.3) çocukta, kontrol grubunda ise 15/75 (%20) çocukta GMD saptandı (p<0.01). Çalışmada toplam 193 dişte GMD tespit edildi. Prematüre grupta GMD görülme sıklığı (n=148, %76.7), kontrol grubundan (n=45, %23.3) daha fazlaydı. En fazla GMD, prematüre grubunda maksiller keser dişlerde, kontrol grubunda ise maksiller molar dişlerde izlendi. Prematüre grubundaki GMD’nin %88.5’i (n=131) mine opasitesi (sınırlı beyaz/krem rengi opasite, sınırlı sarı/kahverengi opasite, diffüz çizgi şeklinde opasite ve diffüz yamalı opasite) ve %11.5’i (n=17) mine hipoplazisi tipindeyken; kontrol grubundaki dişlerin tümünde mine opasitesi (n=45, %100) şeklindeydi. Prematüre grubunda, minede sınırlı beyaz/krem rengi opasite ve sınırlı sarı/kahverengi opasite bulunan diş sayısı kontrol grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde fazla bulundu (p<0.01). Sonuç: Çalışmanın sonuçları, prematüre doğan çocukların süt dişlerinde normal doğum yaşında dünyaya gelmiş çocuklardan daha fazla GMD görüldüğünü, bu defektlerin çoğunlukla maksiller kesici dişlerde ve minede sınırlı opasite şeklinde ortaya çıktığını gösterdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKER, İ., PAMUKÇU, U., ÇINAR, Ç., ODABAŞ, M., KIZILIRMAK, İ., TALAY, T., ALTUNKAYNAK, B., AKARSLAN, Z. (2020). Prevalence and types of developmental enamel defects in primary teeth of preterm children. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1, 13–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/265316

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Prokocimer T, Amir E, Blumer S, Peretz B. Birth-weight, pregnancy term, pre-natal and natal complications related to child’s dental anomalies. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;39:371-6.
  2. Machado Junior LC, Passini Junior R, Rodriges Machado Rosa I. Late prematurity: a systematic review. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2014;90:221-31.
  3. Seow WK, Brown J, Tudehope D, O'callaghan M. Developmental defects in the primary dentition of low birth-weight infants: adverse effects of laryngoscopy and prolonged endotracheal intubation. Pediatr Dent 1984;6:28-31. Usher RH. The special problems of the premature infant. In: Avery GB, editors. Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1987. p. 230-61.
  4. Pearson G, Shann F, Barry P, Vyas J, Thomas D, Powell C, et al. Should paediatric intensive care be centralised? Trent versus Victoria. Lancet 1997;349:1213-7.
  5. Slattery MM, Morrison JJ. Preterm delivery. Lancet 2002;360:1489-97. Seow WK. Effect of preterm birth on oral growth and development. Aust Dent J 1997;42: 85-91. Seow WK. Clinical diagnosis of enamel defects: pitfalls and practical guidelines. Int Dent J 1997;47:173-82.
  6. Lunt RC, Law DB. A review of the chronology of calcification of deciduous teeth. JADA 1974;89:599-606.
  7. Salanitri S, Seow W. Developmental enamel defects in the primary dentition:aetiology and clinical management. Aust Dent J 2013;58:133-40.
  8. Kreshover SJ, Clough OW. Prenatal influences on tooth development:II.Artificially induced fever in rats. J Dent Res 1953;32:565-77.
  9. Ford D, Seow WK, Kazoullis S, Holcombe T, Newman B. A controlled study of risk factors for enamel hypoplasia in the permanent dentition. Pediatr Dent 2009;31:382-8. Seow WK. Enamel hypoplasia in the primary dentition:a review. ASDC J Dent Child 1991;58:441-52. Owen L. The effects of administering tetracyclines to young dogs with particular reference to localization of the drugs in the teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1963;8:715-28.
  10. Hong L, Levy SM, Warren JJ, Dawson DV, Bergus GR, Wefel JS. Association of amoxicillin use during early childhood with developmental tooth enamel defects. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:943-8.
  11. Seow WK, Humphrys C, Tudehope DI. Increased prevalence of developmental dental defects in low birth-weight, prematurely born children: a controlled study. Pediatr Dent 1987;9:221-5.
  12. Takaoka LA, Goulart AL, Kopelman BI, Weiler RM. Enamel defects in the complete primary dentition of children born at term and preterm. Pediatr Dent 2011;33:171-6. Aine