SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Bone age assessment methods in dentistry: a review

Diş hekimliğinde kemik yaşı tayininde kullanılan yöntemler: derleme

Yelda Kasımoğlu
Elif Bahar Tuna-İnce
Pages
39–46
Publication Date
2016-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The objective of this review was to evaluate different methods for assessing skeletal maturity in dentistry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The assessment of facial growth and development is important to determine the optimal timing for different treatment procedures in the growing patient.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Many skeletal maturity indicators have been proposed over previous years because chronologic age is not sufficient alone for assessing the stage of development in a growing child.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The objective of this review was to evaluate different methods for assessing skeletal maturity in dentistry.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Büyüme ve gelişim · çocuklar · iskelet yaşı ölçümü

Abstract

The assessment of facial growth and development is important to determine the optimal timing for different treatment procedures in the growing patient. Many skeletal maturity indicators have been proposed over previous years because chronologic age is not sufficient alone for assessing the stage of development in a growing child. Maturational status has been traditionally evaluated by hand-wrist radiographs which are considered the gold standard. Different radiographic methods have been evaluated for their correlation with the skeletal maturity, and simple and practical alternatives to the hand-wrist radiograph have been presented. In accordance with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, if evaluation of skeletal age is indicated, it is important to take radiographs with the lowest dose. The objective of this review was to evaluate different methods for assessing skeletal maturity in dentistry.

Özet

Büyüme ve gelişimi devam eden hastalarda yüz gelişiminin değerlendirilmesi farklı tedaviler için optimal zamana karar vermede önem taşımaktadır. Büyüme ve gelişimi devam eden bir çocukta, çocuğun gelişiminin değerlendirilmesinde kronolojik yaşın tek başına yeterli bir parametre olamaması nedeni ile çeşitli iskeletsel olgunlaşma indikatörleri geliştirilmiştir. Bireyin olgunlaşma derecesi geleneksel olarak altın standart olarak dakabuledilen el-bilek radyografileri ile saptanabilmektedir. Bu nedenle iskeletsel olgunlaşmayı saptayabilmek için farklı radyografik yöntemler değerlendirilmiş ve el-bilek radyografilerine göre daha basit ve pratik alternatifler sunulmuştur. Mümkün olan en düşük radyasyon ekspozürü prensibine dayanarak, iskelet yaşı değerlendirmesinde en düşük radyasyon dozunun seçilmesi büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı diş hekimliğinde iskeletsel olgunlaşmanın değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan farklı yöntemler hakkında bilgi vermektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kasımoğlu, Y., Tuna-İnce, E. B. (2016). Bone age assessment methods in dentistry: a review. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 39–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/265290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Surendran S, Thomas E. Tooth mineralization stages as a diagnostic tool for assessment of skeletal maturity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:7-14.
  2. Flores-Mir C, Mauricio FR, Orellana MF, Major PW. Association between growth stunting with dental development and skeletal maturation stage. Angle Orthod 2005;75:935-40.
  3. Pasciuti E, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Milani S, Farronato G. Comparison of three methods to assess individual skeletal maturity. J Orofac Orthop 2013;74:397-408.
  4. Madhu S, Hegde AM, Munshi AK. The developmental stages of the middle phalanx of the third finger (MP3): Sole indicator in assessing the skeletal maturity? J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003;27:149-56. San-Román P, Palma JC, Oteo MD, Nevado E. Skeletal maturation determined by cervical vertebrae development. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:303-11.
  5. Chatzigianni A, Halazonetis DJ. Geometric morphometric evaluation of cervical vertebrae shape and its relationship to skeletal maturation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:481.e1-9. Aja-Fernández S, de Luis-García R, Martin-Fernández MA, Alberola-López C. A computational TW3 classifier for skeletal maturity assessment. A Computing with Words approach. J Biomed Inform 2004;37:99-107. Ertürk N. [Teleroentgen studies on the development of the frontal sinus]. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1968;29:245-8. Chapman SM. Ossification of the adductor sesamoid and the adolescent growth spurt. Angle Orthod J 1972;42:236-44. Abdel-Kader HM. The potential of digital dental radiography in recording the adductor sesamoid and the MP3 stages. Br J Orthod 1999;26:291-4.
  6. Ozer T, Kama JD, Ozer SY. A practical method for determining pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:131.e1- 6. Negi KS. Reliability of MP3 (middle phalanx of 3rd finger) stages in assessment of skeletal maturation – a correlative study. The Orthodontic CYBERjournal 2009. http://orthocj.com/2009/10/reliability-ofmiddle-phalanx-of-3rd-finger/. Erişim tarihi: 10.02.2014.
  7. Tikku T, Khanna R, Sachan K, Agrawal S. Correlation of improved version of cervical vertebral maturation indicator with other growth maturity indicators. J Ind Orthod Soc 2013;47:28-32.
  8. Rajagopal R, Kansal S. A comparison of modified MP3 stages and the cervical vertebrae as growth indicators. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:398-406.
  9. Wong RW, Alkhal HA, Rabie AB. Use of cervical vertebral maturation to determine skeletal age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:484.e1-6. Joshi V, Yamaguchi T, Matsuda Y, Kaneko N, Maki K, Okano T. Skel