SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Computer and Education Research / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 14

The Use of Dynamic Geometry Software from a Pedagogical Perspective: Current Status and Future Prospects

Emin İBİLİ
Pages
337–355
Publication Date
2019-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of this research, it was found that GeoGebra and Cabri were the most-used DGS packages by primary school mathematics teachers, while other geometry software was less preferred by teachers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research firstly aims to reveal the pedagogical potentials and limitations of dynamic geometry software (DGS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, research on Cabri (2D/3D/Plus), the Geometer’s Sketchpad, GoogleSketchUp, GeoGebra and Logo software was reviewed and compiled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of this research, it was found that GeoGebra and Cabri were the most-used DGS packages by primary school mathematics teachers, while other geometry software was less preferred by teachers.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dynamic geometry software · pedagogy · mathematics teacher

Abstract

This research firstly aims to reveal the pedagogical potentials and limitations of dynamic geometry software (DGS). For this purpose, research on Cabri (2D/3D/Plus), the Geometer’s Sketchpad, GoogleSketchUp, GeoGebra and Logo software was reviewed and compiled. As a result of the research, it appears that DGS offers an effective pedagogical environment because of its ability to interact with digital materials and allow for geometric objects to be seen from all sides. However, we found that teachers have some problems in combining DGS with class pedagogy. In this study, the effects of gender, age, education level, skill in using technology and the influence of professional experience were also examined in relation to primary school mathematics teachers’ preferences in using DGS. As a result of this research, it was found that GeoGebra and Cabri were the most-used DGS packages by primary school mathematics teachers, while other geometry software was less preferred by teachers.

Özet

This research firstly aims to reveal the pedagogical potentials and limitations of dynamic geometry software (DGS). For this purpose, research on Cabri (2D/3D/Plus), the Geometer’s Sketchpad, GoogleSketchUp, GeoGebra and Logo software was reviewed and compiled. As a result of the research, it appears that DGS offers an effective pedagogical environment because of its ability to interact with digital materials and allow for geometric objects to be seen from all sides. However, we found that teachers have some problems in combining DGS with class pedagogy. In this study, the effects of gender, age, education level, skill in using technology and the influence of professional experience were also examined in relation to primary school mathematics teachers’ preferences in using DGS. As a result of this research, it was found that GeoGebra and Cabri were the most-used DGS packages by primary school mathematics teachers, while other geometry software was less preferred by teachers.

🔖

Cite This Article

İBİLİ, E. (2019). The Use of Dynamic Geometry Software from a Pedagogical Perspective: Current Status and Future Prospects. Journal of Computer and Education Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 14, 337–355. https://ajindex.com/articles/262725

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research–A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255-273.
  2. Bruce, C., Flynn, T., Ross, J., & Moss, J. (2011). Promoting teacher and student mathematics learning through lesson study: a design research approach. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirtyfifth conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 193–200). Ankara:
  3. PME. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: the case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 133–148.
  4. Çelik, A., Erduran, A., & Eryiğit, P. (2016). The effect of utilizing the three dimensional dynamic geometry software in geometry teaching on 12th grade students, their academic success, and their attitudes towards geometry. Buca Faculty of Education Journal (41), 1-16.
  5. Adulyasas, L., & Abdul Rahman, S. (2014). Lesson study incorporating phase-based instruction using geometer's sketchpad and its effects on thai students’ geometric thinking. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 3(3), 252-271.
  6. Dogan, M., & İçel, R. (2011). The role of dynamic geometry software in the process of learning: GeoGebra example about triangles. Journal of Human Sciences, 8(1), 1441-1458.
  7. Filiz, M. (2009). The effect of using geogebra and cabri geometry II dynamic geometry softwares in a web-based setting on students’ achievement. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon. Gooler, D., Kantzer, K., & Knuth, R. (2000, November). Teacher competence in using technologies: The next big question. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. An, J., & Park, N. (2011). Computer application in elementary education bases on fractal geometry theory using logo programming. In IT convergence and services (pp. 241-249).
  8. Springer, Dordrecht. Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D., & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 34(3), 66-72.
  9. Baki, A. (2002). Öğrenen ve öğretenler için bilgisayar destekli matematik [Computer aided mathematics for learners and teachers]. İstanbul:
  10. Ceren Yayınları.
  11. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017. Pereira, L. R., Jardim, D. F., & da Silva, J. M. (2017, December). Modelling plane geometry: T