SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Biology reading literacy: measurement and empowerment through circ learning model

Rizhal RİSTANTO
Ericka DARMAWAN
Pages
1305–1318
Publication Date
2020-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research results indicate that CIRC learning influenced the achievement of students' reading literacy in a Biology context.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Reading literacy in biology learning is related to the ability to understand the meaning of organism and its processes as well as behavior and attitude in supporting reading activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research aims to find out the influence of the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) learning model on students' reading literacy in Biology context.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research results indicate that CIRC learning influenced the achievement of students' reading literacy in a Biology context.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biology · Cooperative · CIRC

Abstract

Reading literacy in biology learning is related to the ability to understand the meaning of organism and its processes as well as behavior and attitude in supporting reading activities. The research aims to find out the influence of the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) learning model on students' reading literacy in Biology context. The research method used includes a quasi-experiment using a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The independent variable is a learning model that consists of two types, namely: CIRC learning model and the conventional model. The research is conducted in 8th Grade of MAH Islamic Schools, Bogor, Indonesia, by involving 66 students as the sample by random sampling. The dependent variable is reading literacy in a Biology context, which is in the subject of plant structure and its utilization in technology. Reading literacy instruments are developed by adapting from PISA that has been stated as valid and reliable. The research results indicate that CIRC learning influenced the achievement of students' reading literacy in a Biology context. The result of sig proves it. value of 0.002<0.005. CIRC was proven to be superior compared to conventional learning in plant structure and its utilization in technology learning. CIRC learning could be applied in biology learning to empower students’ reading literacy.

🔖

Cite This Article

RİSTANTO, R., DARMAWAN, E. (2020). Biology reading literacy: measurement and empowerment through circ learning model. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 1305–1318. https://ajindex.com/articles/262437

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Artelt, C., Schiefele, U., & Schneider, W. (2001). Predictors of reading literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173188
  2. Bacanak, A., & Gökdere, M. (2009). Investigating level of the scientific literacy of primary school teacher candidates. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1–10.
  3. Baer, J., Baldi, S., Ayotte, K., & Green, Patricia, J. (2007). The Reading Literacy of U.S. Fourth-Grade Students in an International Context Results From the 2001 and 2006 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). U. S. Department of Education. https://doi.org/http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008016.pdf
  4. Baer, J., Baldi, S., Ayotte, K., Green, P. J., & Mcgrath, D. (2009). The reading literacy of U.S. fourth-grade students in an international context. The Reading Literacy of U.S. Fourth-Grade Students in an International Context. Baloche, L., & Brody, C. M. (2017). Cooperative learning: exploring challenges, crafting innovations. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1319513
  5. Basyiroh, I. (2017). Program pengembangan kemampuan literasi anak usia dini (studi kasus best practice pembelajaran literasi di tk negeri centeh kota bandung). Tunas Siliwangi, 3(2), 120–134.
  6. Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020084
  7. Bruehl, M., Pan, D., & Ferrer-Vinent, I. J. (2015). Demystifying the chemistry literature: Building information literacy in first-year chemistry students through student-centered learning and experiment design. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500412z
  8. Bustami, Y., Syafruddin, D., & Afriani, R. (2018). The implementation of contextual learning to enhance biology students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 451–457. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.11721
  9. Bustami, Yakobus, Riyati, Y., & Julung, H. (2019). Think talk write with pictured cards on human digestive system: impact of critical thinking skills. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(1), 13–23. Retrieved from http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/biosfer/article/view/9927
  10. Cavas, P. H., Ozdem, Y., & Cavas, B. (2013). Turkish pre-service elementary science teachers ’ scientific literacy level and attitudes toward science. Science Education