Journals / Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of Conceptual Understanding of Botany and Metacognitive Skill in Pre-Service Biology Teacher in Jakarta, Indonesia

Pages
199–214
Publication Date
2019-06-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Students, however, are able to apply the concept into problems faced and students’ metacognitive skill in student planning aspect is unable to arrange goals to be achieved, to prioritize the learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The achievement of learning objective of Biology, especially Phanerogamic Botany requires several important aspects, namely conceptual understanding and metacognitive skill.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research is conducted in July 2018 at the Universitas Negeri Jakarta in Phanerogamic Botany course Eudicot sub-course material with 77 students as sample.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Students, however, are able to apply the concept into problems faced and students’ metacognitive skill in student planning aspect is unable to arrange goals to be achieved, to prioritize the learning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Botany · conceptual understanding · metacognitive

Abstract

The achievement of learning objective of Biology, especially Phanerogamic Botany requires several important aspects, namely conceptual understanding and metacognitive skill. Analysis of conceptual understanding of Botany and metacognitive skill is needed to know to what extent are both aspects of achieving the learning objectives. The research aims to know and analyze the conceptual understanding and metacognitive skill of college students to achieve course objectives. The research is conducted in July 2018 at the Universitas Negeri Jakarta in Phanerogamic Botany course Eudicot sub-course material with 77 students as sample. The research includes in quantitative research with descriptive approach. Results obtained are, among others, the mean of conceptual understanding of Botany and metacognitive skill is 63.07 and 50.15, respectively, which is low based on the achievement score. The analysis result indicates that conceptual understanding of Botany is considered as low due to the difficulty faced by students in finding an example for each clade and in understanding the scientific terms that are the base of the learning. Students, however, are able to apply the concept into problems faced and students’ metacognitive skill in student planning aspect is unable to arrange goals to be achieved, to prioritize the learning.

🔖

Cite This Article

RİSTANTO, R., LESTARİ, P., MİARSYAH, M. (2019). Analysis of Conceptual Understanding of Botany and Metacognitive Skill in Pre-Service Biology Teacher in Jakarta, Indonesia. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 199–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/262527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Abulon., & Raymundo, E.L. (2014). Basic education teachers’ concept of effective teaching: inputs to teacher education curriculum in the Philippines. International Journal of Research Studies In Education 3(3), 35-48. Doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2014.723. Corebima, A.D. (2014). Metacognitive skill measurement integrated inachievement test. American Journal of Educational Research 2 (10), 919-924. doi: 10.12691/education-2-10-11.
  2. Coskun, Y. (2018). A study on metacognitive thingking skills of university students. Journal of Education and Training Studies 6 (3), 38-46. Doi: 10.11114/jets.v6i3.2931. Dewi, S.N.R., Nilawarni, R., Rusdi. (2015). Perbedaan penerapan model conceptual understanding prosedures (cups) dan concept attainment model (cam) terhadap miskonsepsi siswa pada materi sistem pencernaan. Biosferjpb 8(1), 10-19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.8-1.
  3. Entwistle, N. (2008). Taking stock: teaching and learning research in higher education. the Ontario International Symposium on Teaching and Learning In Higher Education 1-45.
  4. Evangeline, C.J. (2012). Examining the effect of metacognitive skill of performence of students. An International Peer Reviewed & Referred SRJIS 3(18), 4054-4059. Retrived from: www.srjis.com. Garcia, T., Cueli., Rodriguez, C., krawec, J., & Castro, P.G. (2015). Metacognitive knowladge and skill instudents with deep approach to learning evidence from mathematical problem solving. Revista De Psicodidactica 20 (2), 209-226. Doi: 10.1387/RevPsicodidact.13060. Hammond, L.D., Austin, K., Cheung, M., & Martin, D. (2017). Thingking about thinking: metacognition. Stanford Univercity School of Education. Hayani, S., Masfufah., Wijayati, N., & Kurniawan, C. (2018). Improvment of metacognition skill and students’ reasoning ability through problem-based learning. Jurnal of Physics 983, 2-7. Doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012174. Hogan, M.J., Harney, O., Dwyer, C., & Noone, C. (2014). Metacognitive skill development and applied system science: a framework of metacognitive skills, self-regulatory fungtions and real-world applications (Chap.4), 55-106. Retrive from: https://www.springerprofessionalde/en/metacognitive-skill-development-and-applied-systems-science-a-fr/2263728.Howard, E. 2004. The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: a metacognitive analysis (Chap.4). 69-83. Retrivefrom:https: //link.springer.com /chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_4. Indariswati, A., & Saptasari, M. (2016). Pengaruh mind maping melalui model pem