SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 29

The Relationship Between Economic Development and State Spendings: The Case of Turkey in 2007:1-2015:3 Quarter

Ekonomik Gelişmişlik-Kamu Harcamaları İlişkisi: 2007:1-2015:3 Dönemi Türkiye Örneği

Hale AKBULUT
Pages
9–23
Publication Date
2017-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, a positive relationship between budget expenditures of local administrations and economic development level is observed in the long run

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to test the relationship between economic development and different public expenditures in terms of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For that purpose, the relationship between central government budget expenditures/local administrations and income level are handled separately.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, a positive relationship between budget expenditures of local administrations and economic development level is observed in the long run
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Wagner hipotezi · sınır testi · hata düzeltme modeli

Abstract

This paper aims to test the relationship between economic development and different public expenditures in terms of Turkey. For that purpose, the relationship between central government budget expenditures/local administrations and income level are handled separately. The quarterly data set of 2007:1-2015:3 is employed. Moreover, bounds testing approach of Pesaran, Shin and Smith and error correction model are preferred as the series are not stationary at the same order. The findings of the paper indicate no evidence for the relationship between economic development and central government budget expenditures in both short and long terms. However, a positive relationship between budget expenditures of local administrations and economic development level is observed in the long run

Özet

Bu çalışma; ekonomik gelişmişlik düzeyi ile farklı kamu harcamaları arasındaki ilişkiyi; Türkiye açısından sınamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla; merkezi yönetim bütçe harcamaları ile mahalli idareler bütçe harcamalarının gelir düzeyi ile olan ilişkisi ayrı olarak ele alınmıştır. Çalışmada 2007:1-2015:3 dönemi; üçer aylık veri setinden yararlanılmıştır. Ayrıca ele alınan serilerin aynı dereceden durağan olmamaları nedeniyle Pesaran, Shin ve Smith’in sınır testi yaklaşımı ve hata düzeltme modeli analiz yöntemi olarak tercih edilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre; ekonomik gelişmişlik düzeyi ile merkezi yönetim bütçe harcamaları arasında hem kısa dönem hem de uzun dönemde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişkinin varlığına rastlanmamıştır. Bununla birlikte mahalli idareler bütçe harcamaları ile ekonomik gelişmişlik düzeyi arasında uzun dönemde pozitif bir ilişkinin var olduğu gözlemlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBULUT, H. (2017). The Relationship Between Economic Development and State Spendings: The Case of Turkey in 2007:1-2015:3 Quarter. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 29, 9–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/26127

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bağdigen, Muhlis and Hakan Çetintaş. ‘Causality Between Public Expenditure and Econo- mic Growth: The Turkish Case’, Journal of Economic and Social Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2003, s. 53-72.
  2. Bairam, Erkin I., ‘Level of Aggregation, Variable Elasticity and Wagner’s Law’, Economics Letters, Vol. 48, No. 3-4, 1995, s. 341-344.
  3. Bardhan, Pranab and Dilip Mookherjee. ‘Expenditure Decentralization and the Delivery of Public Services in Developing Countries’, CIDER Working Paper No. C98-104, 1998,
  4. Berkeley, California: Center for International and Development Economics Research. Brennan, Geoffrey and James M. Buchanan. The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).
  5. Chow, Ying-Foon, John A. Cotsomitis and Andy C. C. Kwan. ‘Multivariate Cointegration and Causality Tests of Wagner’s Hypothesis: Evidence from the UK’, Applied Econo- mics, Vol. 34, No. 13, 2002, s. 1671-1677.
  6. Demirbaş, Safa. ‘Cointegration Analysis-Causality Testing and Wagner’s Law: The Case of Turkey, 1950-1990’, Discussion Papers in Economics, 1999,
  7. Department of Economics, University of Leicester, U.K. Dickey, David A. and Wayne A. Fuller. ‘Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 74, No. 366, 1979, s. 427-431.
  8. Gemmell, Norman, Richard Kneller and Ismael Sanz. ‘Fiscal Decentralization and Econo- mic Growth: Spending versus Revenue Decentralization’, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 51, No. 4, 2013, s. 1915-1931.
  9. Henrekson, Magnus. ‘Wagner’s Law: A Spurious Relationship?’, Public Finance, Vol. 48, No. 2, 1993, s. 406-415.
  10. Işık, Nihat ve Mehmet Alagöz. ‘Kamu Harcamaları ve Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki’, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 24, Ocak - Haziran 2005, s. 63-75.
  11. Iyare, Sunday O. and Troy Lorde. ‘Co-integration, Causality and Wagner’s Law: Tests for Selected Caribbean Countries’, Applied Economics Letters, 2004, Vol. 11, No. 13, s. 815–825.
  12. Karagianni, Stella, Maria Pempetzoglou and Soultana Strikou. ‘Testing Wagner’s Law for the European Union Economies’, Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2002, s. 107-114.
  13. Lamartina, Serena and Andrea Zaghini. ‘Increasing Public Expenditure: Wagner’s Law in OECD Countries’, German Economic Review, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2011, s. 149-164.
  14. Magazzino, Cosimo, Lorenzo Giolli and Marco Mele. ‘Wagner’s Law and Peacock and Wiseman’s Displacement Effect in European Union C