SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 30

Mean and Expected Years of Schooling in Turkey with Province, Year and Gender Breakdown

Türkiye’de İl, Yıl ve Cinsiyet Kırılımlı Ortalama ve Beklenen Okullaşma Yılı

Atalay ÇAĞLAR
Ferda Esin GÜLEL
M. Ensar YEŞİLYURT
Filiz YEŞİLYURT
Oğuz KARADENİZ
Pages
619–641
Publication Date
2018-04-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since these variables are calculated for the first time in this structure, it is thought that it will be useful for researcher, related administrators and policy makers.The most important reason for this is that these variables provide an important indicator for determining the outcomes and causes of the contribution of education investment by gender

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main aim of this study is to measure and investigate the level of education clearly and widely.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within this framework, the Mean Years of Schooling (MYS) and Expected Years of Schooling (EYS) were calculated over time according to both province and gender.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since these variables are calculated for the first time in this structure, it is thought that it will be useful for researcher, related administrators and policy makers.The most important reason for this is that these variables provide an important indicator for determining the outcomes and causes of the contribution of education investment by gender
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to measure and investigate the level of education clearly and widely. Within this framework, the Mean Years of Schooling (MYS) and Expected Years of Schooling (EYS) were calculated over time according to both province and gender. Moreover, the evolution of these variables in the time dimension was determined and inferences were made. Since these variables are calculated for the first time in this structure, it is thought that it will be useful for researcher, related administrators and policy makers.The most important reason for this is that these variables provide an important indicator for determining the outcomes and causes of the contribution of education investment by gender

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı illerin eğitim düzeyini açık ve geniş bir şekilde ölçmek ve analiz etmektedir. Bu yapı çerçevesinde hem il hem de cinsiyete göre zaman içerisinde Ortalama Okullaşma Yılı (OOY) ve Beklenen Okullaşma Yılı (BOY) hesaplanmıştır. Üstelik bu değişkenlerin zaman boyutundaki gelişimi de belirlenmiş ve çıkarımlar yapılmıştır. Bu değişkenler bu yapıda ilk defa hesaplandığı için araştırmacı, ilgili yöneticiler ve politika yapıcılar için yararlı olacağı düşünülmektedir. Bunun en önemli nedeni, bu değişkenlerin eğitim yatırımlarının cinsiyete dayalı katkısının sonuçlarını ve nedenlerini belirlemede önemli bir gösterge oluşturmasıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAĞLAR, A., GÜLEL, F. E., YEŞİLYURT, M. E., YEŞİLYURT, F., KARADENİZ, O. (2018). Mean and Expected Years of Schooling in Turkey with Province, Year and Gender Breakdown. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 30, 619–641. https://ajindex.com/articles/26111

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Barro, R. and Lee, J. W. (2013), A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950-2010, Journal of Development Economics, 104: 184-198
  2. Barro, R. J. and Lee. J. W. (1993), International Comparisons of Educational Attainment, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32: 363-94.
  3. Bowgonovi, F. (2012), The relationship between education and levels of trust and tolerance in Europe, The British Journal of Sociology, 63 (1): 146-167
  4. Coady, D. and Dizioli, A. (2017) Income Inequality and Education Revisited: Persistence, Endogeneity, and Heterogeneity, IMF Working Paper, Değer, Ç., Tunalı-Çalışkan, E. and Aydoğuş, O. (2016), Population Displacement Effect of Refugees in Turkey: An Input-Output Model Based Analysis, TISK Academy, 11 (22): 238-249
  5. Deniz, Z. and Dugruel, A. S. (2008), Disaggregated Education Data and Growth: Some Fa- cts from Turkey and Mena Countries, Topics in Middle Eastern and African Economi- es, 10. Dogan, M. K. ve Yuret, T. (2015), The Causes of Gender Inequality in College Education in Turkey, EY International Congress on Economics II “Growth, Inequality and Poverty” November 5-6, 2015, Ankara/Turkey Ergen, H. (2009). 2008
  6. Yılı Beklenen Eğitim Süresi, Yayımlanmamış Çalışma. Gülel, F. E., Çağlar, A., Kangallı-Uyar, S.G., Karadeniz, O. ve Yeşilyurt, M. E. (2017), Türki- ye’de İllere Göre İnsani Gelişme Endeksi, 27: 208-217
  7. Güngör, N. D. (2010).
  8. Education, Human Capital Inequality and Economic Growth: Evi- dence from Turkey, Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies. 10 (2): 53-71
  9. Hanushek, E. A. and Woessmann, L. (2007), The Role of Education Quality for Economic Growth, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4122 Hill, M. A. and King, E. M. (1995), Women’s Education and Economic Well-being, Feminist Economics 1, 21-46. Human Development Report 2016, UNDP, http://hdr.undp.org
  10. Karadeniz, O., Köse, S., Durusoy, S. (2007), Türkiye’de Eğitinin Getirileri ve Finansmanı, içinde Türkiye’de Eğitim ve Beşeri Sermaye, Ed:Oğuz Karadeniz, Gazi Kitapevi, An- kara: 79-122
  11. Lee, J. W. ve Barro, R. J. (2001), International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications, Oxford Economic Papers, 53(3): 541-563
  12. Lucas, Robert E. (1988), On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42. Milli Eğitim İstatistikleri, 2010-2015, www.meb.gov.tr Nelson, R. R. and Phelps, E. (1966),
  13. Investment in Humans, Technology Diffusion and Eco- nomic Growth, American Economic Review 56 (2): 69-75.
  14. Özpınar, E., & Koyuncu, E. (2016). «Türk