SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Evaluation of Remarketing Audiences in E-Commerce

E-Ticarette Yeniden Pazarlama Kitlelerinin Değerlendirilmesi için Makine Öğrenmesi Sınıflandırıcılarının Karşılaştırması

Haydar EKELİK
Şenol EMİR
Pages
341–359
Publication Date
2021-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Three classification models based on artificial neural networks, classification and regression trees (CART), and random forest are built to make predictions and then classification performances of these models are compared.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, user data of an e-commerce site operating in Turkey is examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main goal is to make accurate predictions for remarketing and thus offer customized ad packages for new visitors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Three classification models based on artificial neural networks, classification and regression trees (CART), and random forest are built to make predictions and then classification performances of these models are compared.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeniden pazarlama · Google Analytics · Yapay Sinir Ağları

Abstract

In this study, user data of an e-commerce site operating in Turkey is examined. Users are those who have visited the site before, that is, they are in the remarketing audience pool. The main goal is to make accurate predictions for remarketing and thus offer customized ad packages for new visitors. Visitors are labeled as "Shoppers" and "Non-shoppers" based on their previous visits. The data set is divided into two portions that do not intersect with each other as training and test sets. Three classification models based on artificial neural networks, classification and regression trees (CART), and random forest are built to make predictions and then classification performances of these models are compared.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de faaliyet gösteren bir e-ticaret sitesinin kullanıcı verileri incelenmiştir. Bu kullanıcılar siteyi daha önce ziyaret eden, yani yeniden pazarlama (remarketing) kitle havuzu içerisinde bulunan kullanıcılardır. Temel amaç, yeniden pazarlama için doğru tahminler yapmak ve böylece yeni ziyaretçiler için özelleştirilmiş reklam içerikleri sunmaktır. Ziyaretçiler, e-ticaret sitesindeki önceki ziyaretlerine göre "alışveriş yapan" ve "alışveriş yapmayan" olarak etiketlendirilmiştir. Veri seti, eğitim ve test kümeleri olarak birbiriyle kesişmeyen iki bölüme ayrılmıştır. Tahmin yapmak için Yapay sinir ağlarına, sınıflandırma ve regresyon ağaçlarına (CART) ve rassal ormana (random forest) dayalı üç sınıflandırma modeli oluşturulmuş ve sınıflandırma performansları karşılaştırılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKELİK, H., EMİR, Ş. (2021). A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Evaluation of Remarketing Audiences in E-Commerce. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 341–359. https://ajindex.com/articles/259768

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Afrina, Y., Tasneem, S., & Fatema, K. (2015). Effectiveness of Digital Marketing in the Challenging Age: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 1(5), 69-80.
  2. Arrigo, E., Liberati, C., & Mariani, P. (2021). Social Media Data and Users' Preferences: A Statistical Analysis to Support Marketing Communication. Big Data Research, 24, 100189. Ballestar, M., Grau, P., & Sainz, J. (2017). Customer segmentation in e-commerce: Applications to the cashback business model. Journal of Business Research, 88, 407-414.
  3. Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning(24), 123-140. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018054314350
  4. Breiman, Leo, Jerome H. Friedman, Richard A. Olshen, and Charles J. Stone, Classification And Regression Trees, Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science Series, 1984,
  5. İ Charlesworth, A. (2018). Digital Marketing A Practical Approach (3rd edition ed.). New York: Routledge. Ciaburro, G., & Venkateswaran, B. (2017). Neural Networks with R. Birmingham-Mumbai.: Packt Publishing. Derevitskii, I., Severiukhina, O., & Bochenina, K. (2019). Clustering Interest Graphs for Customer Segmentation Problems. 2019 Sixth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS), (pp. 321-327).
  6. Devi, G., & Das, D. (2020). Role of Customer segmentation in eMarketing. Solid State Technology, 63(5), 6251-6256.
  7. Dogan, O., Hiziroglu, A., & Seymen, O. (2020). Segmentation of Retail Consumers with Soft Clustering Approach. Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques: Smart and Innovative Solutions (pp. 39-46). Springer International Publishing. Gupta, R., & Pathak, C. (2014). A Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Purchase by Online Customers based on Dynamic Pricing. Procedia Computer Science, 36, 599-605.
  8. Haykin, S. (2008). Neural Networks and Learning Machines. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. doi:978-0131471399 Jäger, G. (2019). Replacing Rules by Neural Networks A Framework for Agent-Based Modelling. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 3(4), 51. doi:10.3390/bdcc3040051 James, G., Witen, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2014). An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7
  9. Lee, S. S. (2000). Noisy Replication in Skewed Binary Classification. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 2(34), 161-195. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00095-X
  10. Levin, N., & Zahavi, J. (2001). Predictive mode