Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2013 / Sayı: 11

Operational costs of taxation: An example of the tax administration department in Mersin

Vergilemenin operasyonel maliyetleri: Mersin vergi idaresi başkanlığı örneği

Pages
109–125
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In our study, referring to the operational costs, will try to make these costs to be more quantitative with the help of Mersin Tax Administration Department.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The primary and the most important financing of public spending is taxes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The period from the initiation of these taxes to collection of these taxes imposed different costs on taxpayers and tax administration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In our study, referring to the operational costs, will try to make these costs to be more quantitative with the help of Mersin Tax Administration Department.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The primary and the most important financing of public spending is taxes. The period from the initiation of these taxes to collection of these taxes imposed different costs on taxpayers and tax administration. The initial cost of the tax that occurs after imposing is a burden which is brought to person (taxpayer). The secondary cost of taxation is the effect that occurs on the market. Thirdly we call operational costs that are administrative costs and compliance costs, occur because of implementing tax system. Measuring the costs of taxation is important to measure the effectiveness of taxation. Although it is difficult to measure the costs of taxation, it is possible to evaluate this subject with managers in tax administration and to measure the costs of tax administration. In our study, referring to the operational costs, will try to make these costs to be more quantitative with the help of Mersin Tax Administration Department.

Özet

Kamu harcamalarının birincil ve en önemli finansmanı vergilerdir. Bu vergilerin konulmasından tahsilatına kadar olan süreçte mükelleflere ve vergi idaresine bir kısım maliyetler yüklemektedir. Verginin konulmasından sonra oluşan ilk maliyet, verginin salındığı kişiye (mükellef) getirdiği yüktür. Vergilemenin ikinci maliyeti piyasa üzerinde oluşan etkidir. Üçüncüsü ise, operasyonel maliyetler dediğimiz vergi sisteminin uygulanması nedeniyle ortaya çıkan idari maliyetler ile uyum maliyetleridir. Vergileme de etkinliğin ölçülmesi için vergileme maliyetlerinin ölçülmesi önemlidir. Her ne kadar vergileme maliyetlerinin ölçümünü yapmak güç olsa da, vergi idaresi bünyesinde görev alan yöneticiler açısından konunun değerlendirmesini yapmak ve idari açıdan maliyetleri ölçmek mümkündür. Çalışmamızda operasyonel maliyetlerden bahsederek, bu maliyetleri Mersin Vergi İdaresi Başkanlığı nezdinde yapılan mülakat yardımıyla daha niceliksel hale getirmeye çalışacağız.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAZMAN, G. G., AKSU, Y. (2013). Operational costs of taxation: An example of the tax administration department in Mersin. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 11, 109–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/259160

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AKÇA F. Nilgün B. (1999), “Vergi Maliyeti Üzerine”, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt:1, Sayı: 1, 67-73.
  2. AKTAN, Coşkun Can ve İstiklal Yaşar VURAL (2004), “Vergi Rekabeti,” Erciyes Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Sayı:22, 1-18.
  3. ALEXEEV, Michael, JANEBA, Eckhard ve Stefan OSBORNE (2004), “Taxation and Evasion in the Presence of Extortion by Organized Crime”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 375–387. ARIFF, Mohamed, ISMAIL, Zubaidah ve Alfred LOH (1997), “Compliance Costs of Corparate Income Taxation in Singapore”, Journal of Business Finance&Accounting, 24 (9), 1253-1268.
  4. BENK, Serkan ve Ekrem KARAYILMAZLAR (2010), “Vergilemenin Operasyonel Maliyetleri: Kavramsal Bir Değerlendirme”, Maliye Dergisi, Sayı 159, 137-154.
  5. DEMİR, Erol ve Alper DEMİR (2008), “Vergi Kaçırma Eğilim ve Uzlaşma”, İktisat, İşletme Finans Dergisi, 23(267), 61-69.
  6. EICHFELDER, Sebastian and Chandal KEGELS (2012), “Compliance Costs Caused by Agency Action? Emprical Evidence and Implementation for Tax Compliance”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Avaible online 9 October 2012.
  7. EVANS, Chris (2003), “Studying the Studies: An Overview of Recent Research into Taxation Operating Costs, eJournal of Tax Research, 64-92.
  8. EVANS, Chris ve Binh TRAN-NAM (2002), Evaluating the Compliance Costs and Benefits of the Tax Value Method, Australian Taxation Studies Program Report, 1-24.
  9. GEYS, Benny ve Jan VERMEIR (2008a), “The Political Cost of Taxation: New Evidence from German Popularity Ratings”, Electoral Studies 27, 633-648.
  10. GEYS, Benny ve Jan VERMEIR (2008b), “Taxation and Presidential Approval: Separate Effects from Tax Burden and Tax Structure Turbulence?”, Public Choice 135, 301–317. GÖKER, Zeliha (2008), “Vergi Rekabetinin Kamu Harcamalarına Etkisi ve Harcama Rekabeti”, Maliye Dergisi, Sayı 154, 121-134.
  11. GUNZ, Sally, Alan MACNAUGHTON ve Karen WENSLEY (1996), “Measuring The Compliance Costs of Tax Expenditures: The Case of Research and Development Incentives”, Working Paper: 6, 1-47.
  12. HANSSON, Asa (2007), “Taxpayers’ Responsiveness to Tax Rate Changes and Implications for the Cost of Taxation in Sweden”, Int Tax Public Finan., 14, 563–582. HETTICH, Walter ve Stanley L. WINER (1988), “ Economic and Political Foundations of Tax Structure”, The American Economic Review, 78 (4), 701-712.
  13. HUDSON, John and Micheal GODWIN (2000), “The Compliance Costs of Collecting Direct Tax in the UK: An Analysis of PAYE and National Insurance, Journal of Public Economics, 77, 29-44.
  14. KAU, James B. ve Paul H. RUBIN (2002