Journals / Journal of Life Economics / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

WHAT IF TURKEY WAS A MEMBER OF THE FAMILY: THE EFFECTS OF FISCAL POLICIES ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE SELECTED EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRIES AND TURKEY

TÜRKİYE DE AİLEDEN BİRİ OLSAYDI: MALİYE POLİTİKASININ SEÇİLMİŞ AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ ÜYESİ ÜLKELERDE VE TÜRKİYE’DE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ

Pages
119–138
Publication Date
2016-07-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With regard to the different methods of panel data analysis, empirical results show that taxes, social contributions and public consumption expenditure variables are the key elements which effect economic growth

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research concentrates on the effects of several fiscal policy instruments on the economic performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study contains Turkey in its extended models as well as selected European Union countries which also include so-called PIIGS or debt overhang countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With regard to the different methods of panel data analysis, empirical results show that taxes, social contributions and public consumption expenditure variables are the key elements which effect economic growth
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Maliye Politikası · Kamu Harcamaları · Vergileme ve Kamu Gelirleri

Abstract

This research concentrates on the effects of several fiscal policy instruments on the economic performance. The study contains Turkey in its extended models as well as selected European Union countries which also include so-called PIIGS or debt overhang countries. With regard to the different methods of panel data analysis, empirical results show that taxes, social contributions and public consumption expenditure variables are the key elements which effect economic growth

Özet

Bu araştırma çeşitli maliye politikası araçlarının ekonomik performans üzerindeki etkilerini tespit etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada seçilmiş Avrupa Birliği üyesi ülkeler ve PIIGS olarak da adlandırılan borç krizi yaşayan ülkelerin yanı sıra genişletilmiş modelde Türkiye de yer almaktadır. Panel veri analizinin çeşitli yöntemleriyle yapılan ampirik sınamalar çerçevesinde ekonomik büyümeyi etkileyen ana değişkenlerin vergiler, sosyal güvenlik harcamaları ve kamu tüketim harcamaları olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ESENER, S. Ç. (2016). WHAT IF TURKEY WAS A MEMBER OF THE FAMILY: THE EFFECTS OF FISCAL POLICIES ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE SELECTED EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRIES AND TURKEY. Journal of Life Economics, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 119–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/2591

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. AKAR, S. (2014).
  2. Türkiye'de Sağlık Harcamaları, Sağlık Harcamalarının Nispi Fiyatı ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 21(1), 311-322.
  3. ANGELOPOULOS, K., ECONOMIDES, G., KAMMAS, P., (2007). Tax-Spending Policies and Economic Growth: Theoretical Predictions and Evidence from the OECD, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 23, 885-902.
  4. ANGELOPOULOS, K., PHILIPPOPOULOS A., TSIONAS E. (2008). Does Public Sector Efficiency Matter? Revisiting the Relation Between Fiscal Size and Economic Growth in a World Sample, Public Choice 137, 245–278.
  5. ARELLANO, M., (2003).
  6. Panel Data Econometrics, Oxford University Press,
  7. New York. ARELLANO, M., BOND, S., (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
  8. BALTAGI, B.H., (2001).
  9. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Second Edition, John Wiley& Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 2001.
  10. BARRO, R.J., (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, 103-125.
  11. BARRO, R.J., (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2), 407-443.
  12. BARRO, R.J., (1996). Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study, NBER Working Paper No. 5698. BARRO, R.J., (2013).
  13. Education and Economic Growth, Annals of Economics and Finance, 14-2, 301-328.
  14. BELLETTINI, G., CERONI, C., (2000). Social Security Expenditure and Economic Growth: An Empirical Assessment, Research in Economics, vol. 54, no. 3, 249-275.
  15. BENOIT, E., (1973). Defence and Economic Growth in Developing Countries, Lexington Books, Boston. BENOIT, E., (1978). Growth and Defence in Developing Countries, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 26, 261-280.
  16. BENOS, N., (2009). Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from EU Countries, MPRA Paper No. 19174. BHARGAVA, A., JAMISON, D.T., LAU, L., MURRAY C.J., (2000). Modeling the Effects of Health on Economic Growth, GPE Discussion Paper Series, 33, 1-33.
  17. BISWAS, B., RAM, R., (1986). Military Expenditures and Economic Growth in Less Developed Countries: An Augmented Model and Further Evidence, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 34, 361-372.
  18. BLEANEY M., GEMMELL N., KNELLER R., (2001). Testing the Endogenous Growth Model: Public Expenditure, Taxation, and Growth over the Long Run, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 34, No. 1, 36 57 BLOOM, D.E., CANNING,