Journals / Business and Economics Research Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 5

A Two-Way Empirical Investigation on Economic Growth, Public Revenue and Expenditure for Developed and Developing Countries

Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İktisadi Büyüme, Kamu Gelirleri ve Harcamalarının Çift Yönlü Nedenselliğine Dair Ampirik Bir Analiz

Pages
1051–1070
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, for the revenue and expenditure case, the results indicate an evidence of a unilateral relationship for four countries which are supporting spend-tax and one other has bidirectional interaction that associated with fiscal synchronization hypotheses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:By focusing on the investigation of long-term, this study aims to examine the relationship between public revenue, government expenditure and economic growth while bearing Wagner’s Law, Peacock-Wiseman’s Displacement Effect, Classical and Keynesian View on fiscal policy in mind.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We took a sample of 22 developing and developed countries which are noticeable with their economic activities in the recent era of globalization for the period of 1985-2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, for the revenue and expenditure case, the results indicate an evidence of a unilateral relationship for four countries which are supporting spend-tax and one other has bidirectional interaction that associated with fiscal synchronization hypotheses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

By focusing on the investigation of long-term, this study aims to examine the relationship between public revenue, government expenditure and economic growth while bearing Wagner’s Law, Peacock-Wiseman’s Displacement Effect, Classical and Keynesian View on fiscal policy in mind. We employed the bootstrap panel Granger causality methodology to analyze the variables and found different linkages between both revenue and spending versus gross domestic product ratios but also some relations within and vice versa. We took a sample of 22 developing and developed countries which are noticeable with their economic activities in the recent era of globalization for the period of 1985-2017. According to the empirical results, for the growth front; public revenue independent variable is much more related or integrated with the dependent GDP variables for some countries while expenditure is also important as a deterministic factor for some others. On the other hand, for the revenue and expenditure case, the results indicate an evidence of a unilateral relationship for four countries which are supporting spend-tax and one other has bidirectional interaction that associated with fiscal synchronization hypotheses. Conspicuously, triggering affection through government expenditure to revenue and a both-way interaction between public revenue to gross domestic product can be expressed.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı kamu gelirleri, hükümet harcamaları ile iktisadi büyüme değerleri arasındaki ilişkinin uzun dönemli bir analizle tespitidir. Söz konusu analizlerde; Wagner Yasası, Peacock-Wiseman Sıçrama Tezi ve maliye politikasına Klasik ve Keynesyen bakış da hesaba katılmıştır. Çalışmada değişkenlerin analizi için panel Granger nedensellik yönteminden yararlanılmış; gerek gelir ve harcamaların büyümeyle gerekse de kendi aralarındaki ve tersi yöndeki ilişkileri irdelenmiş ve farklı örnek ülkeler için farklı bağlantılara rastlanılmıştır. İktisadi aktivite açısından küreselleşme ile ön plana çıkmış gelişmekte olan ve gelişmiş 22 ülkenin ele alındığı analizlerde 1985-2017 yılları arası döneme ait veriler kullanılmıştır. Ampirik analizlerden elde edilen bulgulara göre, büyüme cephesi için; GSYİH bağımlı değişkenleriyle istatistiksel olarak daha kuvvetli etkileşim içerisinde olan bağımsız değişkenin kamu gelirleri olduğu, buna karşın, kimi ülkeler için giderlerin de belirleyici olabildiği tespit edilmiştir. Öte yandan, gelir ve harcamaların kendi arasındaki etkileşimi açısından ise dört ülkenin tek yönlü bir biçimde harcama-vergi ve bir ülkenin de çift yönlü olarak mali senkronizasyon (uyum) hipotezini desteklediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Çalışma özelinde, özellikle kamu harcamalarının kamu gelirlerini; kamu gelirlerinin ve GSYİH değerlerinin de birbirlerini kuvvetli biçimde tetikleyebildiği savunulabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ESENER, S. Ç. (2019). A Two-Way Empirical Investigation on Economic Growth, Public Revenue and Expenditure for Developed and Developing Countries. Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 5, 1051–1070. https://ajindex.com/articles/143800

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adkisson, R. V., & Mohammed, M. (2014). Tax structure and state economic growth during the Great Recession. The Social Science Journal, 51(2014), 79-89.
  2. Afonso, A., & Rault, C. (2009). Spend and tax: A panel data investigation for the EU. Economics Bulletin, 29(4), 2542-2548.
  3. Amir, H., Asafu-Adjaye, J., & Ducpham, T. (2013). The impact of the Indonesian income tax reform: A CGE analysis. Economic Modelling, 31(2013), 492-501.
  4. Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Asteriou, D., & Hall, S. G. (2007). Applied econometrics: A modern approach using e-views and microfit. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Baghestani, H., & McNown R. (1994). Do Revenues or expenditures respond to budgetary disequilibria? Southern Economic Journal, 60(2), 311-322.
  6. Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data (2nd Ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Barro, R. J. (1979). On the determination of the public debt. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 940-971.
  7. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
  8. Bolat, S. (2014). The relationship between government revenues and expenditures: Bootstrap panel granger causality analysis on European countries. Economic Research Guardian, 4(2), 2-17.
  9. Breitung, J. (2005). A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econometric Reviews, 24, 151-173.
  10. Breusch, T., & Pagan, A. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its application to model specifications in econometrics. Reviews of Economics Studies, 47, 239-253.
  11. Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.
  12. Bujang, I., Abd, T., & Ahmad, I. (2013). Tax structure and economic indicators in developing and high-income OECD countries: Panel cointegration analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7(2013), 164-173.
  13. Chang, T., & Chang, G. (2009). Revisiting the government revenue-expenditure nexus: Evidence from 15 OECD countries based on the panel data approach. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 59, 165-172.
  14. Chang, T., Liu, W.R., & Caudill, S.B. (2002). Tax-and-spend, spend-and-tax, or fiscal synchronization: New evidence for ten countries. Applied Economics, 34(12), 1553-1561.
  15. Cheng, B.S. (1999). Causality between taxes and expenditures: Evidence from Latin American countries. Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(2), 184-192.
  16. Chu, H. P., Chang, T., & Sagafi-neja