Journals / International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Comparative study on the performance of different drive mechanisms used in a beta type Stirling engine through thermodynamic analysis

Pages
44–60
Publication Date
2019-09-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since all the changes of the volume in the bell crank, slider crank and scotch yoke drive mechanisms are very close to each other, the net work performance values obtained with the equal amount of working fluid and the same charge pressure values are also very close to each other.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, thermodynamic and kinematic analyses of bell crank, slider crank, rhombic and scotch yoke drive mechanisms were performed for a beta type Stirling engine with a swept volume of 365 cm3.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, in this research conducted with working fluid of equal amount (m=0.000716 kg), for all of drive mechanisms, it was determined that engine with rhombic drive mechanism generates 19.2% net work more than the other drive mechanism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since all the changes of the volume in the bell crank, slider crank and scotch yoke drive mechanisms are very close to each other, the net work performance values obtained with the equal amount of working fluid and the same charge pressure values are also very close to each other.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Stirling engines · Bell crank · Slider crank

Abstract

In this study, thermodynamic and kinematic analyses of bell crank, slider crank, rhombic and scotch yoke drive mechanisms were performed for a beta type Stirling engine with a swept volume of 365 cm3. The kinematic analyses of Stirling engines with these different drive mechanisms were investigated by using the MSC Adams program, and the pressure-volume variations depending on the crankshaft angle were determined by using the isothermal analysis method. It was determined that compression and expansion volume values of rhombic drive mechanism were close to each other, while compression volume value was extremely higher than expansion volume value in other drive mechanisms. For this reason, in this research conducted with working fluid of equal amount (m=0.000716 kg), for all of drive mechanisms, it was determined that engine with rhombic drive mechanism generates 19.2% net work more than the other drive mechanism. The masses of working fluid used in 1 bar charge pressure from engines with bell crank, slider crank, rhombic and scotch yoke drive mechanism were 0.000716 kg, 0.000737 kg, 0.000536 kg and 0.000724 kg, respectively. The net work amounts obtained as a result of the thermodynamic analyses made for the 1 bar charge pressure value in bell crank, slider crank, rhombic and scotch yoke drive mechanisms are 12.85 J, 12.44 J, 11.61 J and 13.05 J, respectively. In this research conducted with working fluid in the same charge pressure, it was determined that 10.8% less net work was obtained from engine with rhombic drive mechanism. Since all the changes of the volume in the bell crank, slider crank and scotch yoke drive mechanisms are very close to each other, the net work performance values obtained with the equal amount of working fluid and the same charge pressure values are also very close to each other.

🔖

Cite This Article

EROL, D., ÇALIŞKAN, S. (2019). Comparative study on the performance of different drive mechanisms used in a beta type Stirling engine through thermodynamic analysis. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 44–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/258381

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. N. Abas, A. Kalair, N. Khan, Review of fossil fuels and future energy technologies, Futures, 69, 31-49, (2015)
  2. BP, Statistical Review of World Energy, (2016)
  3. A.A.A. Agll, Y.M. Hamad, T.A. Hamad, J.W. Sheffield, Study of energy recovery and power generation from alternative energy source, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 4, 92-98, (2014)
  4. S. Shafiee, E. Topal, When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished?, Energy Policy, 37, 181-189, (2009)
  5. K. Kaygusuz, Energy for sustainable development: A case of developing countries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 1116-1126, (2012)
  6. G. Walker, Stirling engines, United States by Oxford University Press, (1980)
  7. R. Stirling, Stirling air engine and the heat regenerator, Patent No: 4081, (1816)
  8. D. Erol, H. Yaman, B. Doğan, A review development of rhombic drive mechanism used in the Stirling engines, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 1044-1067, (2017)
  9. C. Çınar, F. Aksoy, D. Erol, The effect of displacer material on the performance of a low temperature differential Stirling engine, International Journal of Energy Research, 36, 911-917, (2012)
  10. H.D. Brey, H. Rinia, F.L.V. Weenen, Fundamentals for the development of the philips air engine, Philips Technical Review, 9, 97-104, (1947)
  11. R.J. Meijer, The Philips hot gas engine with rhombic drive mechanism, Philips Technical Review, 20, 245-276, (1959)
  12. R.J. Meijer, Philips Stirling engine activities, SAE Technical Paper, 650004, (1965
  13. G. Walker, O.R. Fauvel, G. Reader, The literature of stirling engines, in: Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Proceedings of the 24th Intersociety, (1989)
  14. G. Schmidt, Theorie der Lehmann’schen Calorischen Maschine (Theory of Lehmann’s caloric machine), Zeitschrift des Vereins deutscher Ingenieure, 15, (1871)
  15. A.J. Organ, Thermodynamics and gas dynamics of the stirling cycle machine, Cambridge University Press, New York, (1992)
  16. T. Finkelstein, A new isothermal theory for Stirling machine analysis and a volume optimization using the concept of ancillary and tidal domains, in: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 212, 225-236, (1998)
  17. I. Delyova, D. Hroncova, P. Frankovsky, E. Dzurisova, F. Rakay, Kinematic analysis of crank rocker mechanism using MSC Adams/View, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 611, 90-97, (2014)
  18. J. Doane, Machine analysis with computer appli