SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Different Leaf Water Potentials (Ψleaf) and Cluster Thinning Applications Effects on Phytochemical Properties in cv. Sangiovese

Farklı Yaprak Su Potansiyeli (Ψyaprak) ve Salkım Seyreltme Uygulamalarının Sangiovese Üzüm Çeşidinin Fitokimyasal Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri

Elman BAHAR
İlknur KORKUTAL
İpek Ezgi KABATAŞ
Pages
11–18
Publication Date
2017-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, Ψpd nЄ(-0.3;-0.7] MPainterval leaf water potential application and when the excessive yield existing, %50 Cluster Thinning could berecomended for the cv.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted in order to determine the effects of leaf water potential and cluster thinningapplications on phytochemical properties of cv.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Four different leaf water potential (Ψleaf) applications;(Control (Non irrigated) (<0.7MPa), Ψpd nЄ (-0.3;-0.5] MPa, Ψpd nЄ (-0.3;-0.6] MPa, Ψpd nЄ (-0.3;-0.7] MPa)and two different cluster thinning applications; (non cluster thinning and 50% cluster thinning) were made.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, Ψpd nЄ(-0.3;-0.7] MPainterval leaf water potential application and when the excessive yield existing, %50 Cluster Thinning could berecomended for the cv.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fitokimyasal özellikler · salkım seyreltme · sangiovese

Abstract

This study was conducted in order to determine the effects of leaf water potential and cluster thinningapplications on phytochemical properties of cv. Sangiovese. Four different leaf water potential (Ψleaf) applications;(Control (Non irrigated) (<0.7MPa), Ψpd nЄ (-0.3;-0.5] MPa, Ψpd nЄ (-0.3;-0.6] MPa, Ψpd nЄ (-0.3;-0.7] MPa)and two different cluster thinning applications; (non cluster thinning and 50% cluster thinning) were made. In thisresearch, it was determined that the application of Ψpd nЄ (-0.3;-0.7 MPa) improves the phytochemical propertiesmore than control treatment. Cluster thinning applications had an insignificant effect on leaf water potentials,whereas %50 Cluster Thinning application had an positive effect on the quality. As a result, Ψpd nЄ(-0.3;-0.7] MPainterval leaf water potential application and when the excessive yield existing, %50 Cluster Thinning could berecomended for the cv. Sangiovese.

Özet

Bu çalışma yaprak su potansiyeli ve salkım seyreltme uygulamalarının Sangiovese üzüm çeşidinin

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHAR, E., KORKUTAL, İ., KABATAŞ, İ. E. (2017). Different Leaf Water Potentials (Ψleaf) and Cluster Thinning Applications Effects on Phytochemical Properties in cv. Sangiovese. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 11–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/257059

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Acevedo C, Ortego-Farias S, Moreno Y, Cordova F, 2004. Effects of different levels of water application in pre-and post-veraison on must composition and winecolor (cv. Cabernet Sauvignon). Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops. Aires A, Neves M, Almeida C, Castro R, 1997. Influencia do controlo da produçao na relaçao rendimento/qualidade (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Baga). II Congresso Iberoamericano e III Congresso Iberico de Ciencias Horticolas, Actas de Horticultura, 18: 217-222.
  2. Bindon K, Dry P, Loveys B, 2008. Influence of partial rootzone drying on the composition and accumulation of anthocyanins in grape berries (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon). Australian Jurnal of Grape and Wine Research 14(2): 91-103.
  3. Blouin J, Guimberteau G, 2000. Maturation et Maturite des Raisins. Feret, Bordeaux ISBN: 2-902416-49-0. Boubals D, 2001. L’eclaircissage manuel de grapes (vendage en vert). Progress Agricole et Viticole 118(17): 71-78.
  4. Calo A, Tomasi D, Crespan M, Costacurta A, 1997. Relationship between environmental factors and the dynamics of growth and composition of the grapevine. Acta Horticulturae 427: 217-232. Carbonneau A, 1998. Aspects Qualitatifs. 258-276. In: Tiercelin, JR(Ed.), Traite d’irrigation. Tec&Doc. Lavosier Ed, Paris 1011p. Carbonneau A, Champagnol F, Deloire A, Sevilla F, 1998. Récolte et qualité du raisin, in C. Flanzy. Fondements Scientifiques et Technologiques. Lavoisier Tec&Doc ed, 1311p Carbonneau A, Deloire A, Jaillard B, 2007.
  5. La Vigne. Physiologie, Terroir, Culture. Dunod, Paris, 441p. ISBN: 9782100499984. Carbonneau A, Bahar E, 2009. Vine and berry responses to contrasted water fluxes in Ecotron around veraison: Manipulation of berry shrivelling and consequences on berry growth sugar loading and maturation. 16. International Symp. GIESCO Univ. of California. 12-15 July 2009, USA, pp. 145-154. Cemeroğlu B, 2007. Gıda Analizleri. Gıda Teknolojisi Derneği Yayınları No:34, Ankara.
  6. Climaco P, Teixeira K, Ferreirinho MC, 2004. Efeitos da monda de cachos no rendimento e qualidade da cv. Alicante Bouschet. Vinea, Revista Viticultura Alentejo, Abril-Junho 46-53.
  7. Corino L, Ruaro P, Renosio G, Rabino M, Malerba G, 1992. Cluster thinning on the Barbera vine in some areas of Monferrato. Viticultural behaviour. Vignevini Bologna 18(7-8): 51-55.
  8. Deloire A, Carbonneau A, Wang Z, Ojeda H, 2004. Vine and water, a short review. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 38(1): 1-13. Deloire A,