Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of changes on some morphological characteristics in different eggplant scion/rootstock combinations under salt and drought stresses.

Tuzluluk ve Kuraklık Stresi Altında Farklı Patlıcan Anaç/Kalem Kombinasyonlarının Bazı Morfolojik Özelliklerinde Meydana Gelen Değişimlerin İncelenmesi

Pages
43–54
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicated that grafted plants were more resistant tostress conditions than non-grafted plants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, eggplants grown with both grafted, salt tolerant rootstocks and non-grafted roots fromfour different eggplant genotypes, under salt stress and drought inducing conditions, were investigated duringtheir pre-flowering stages.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the plant materials, four eggplant scion (salt tolerant: Mardin Kızıltepe and BurdurMerkez; salt sensitive: Artvin Hopa and Kemer) and two rootstock (Köksal- F1, Vista-306) varieties were used.The plants in 12 different grafting combinations had salt and drought conditions applied to each of them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicated that grafted plants were more resistant tostress conditions than non-grafted plants.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aşılama · bitki biyoması · kuraklık

Abstract

In this study, eggplants grown with both grafted, salt tolerant rootstocks and non-grafted roots fromfour different eggplant genotypes, under salt stress and drought inducing conditions, were investigated duringtheir pre-flowering stages. For the plant materials, four eggplant scion (salt tolerant: Mardin Kızıltepe and BurdurMerkez; salt sensitive: Artvin Hopa and Kemer) and two rootstock (Köksal- F1, Vista-306) varieties were used.The plants in 12 different grafting combinations had salt and drought conditions applied to each of them. Thedrought stress (irrigated when 50% of available moisture was depleted) and the salt stress (6 dSm-1) were appliedindividually. At the end of the applied stress conditions, the plant samples were evaluated according to fresh weightand dry weight of their green parts and roots, leaf area, stem diameter, shoot and root heights. In this study, thehighest fresh weight and dry weight were determinated in Köksal F1/Kemer (284.42 and 50.59 g plant-1). Moreover,the least changes in root dry weight was observed in Köksal-F1/Burdur Merkez (11.40% ) under drought andKöksal-F1/Artvin Hopa (5.71 %) under salinity. These results indicated that grafted plants were more resistant tostress conditions than non-grafted plants. Overall, it was determined that Köksal-F1 rootstock had a more effectivetolerance to salt and drought stress conditions than the Vista rootstock variety

Özet

Bu çalışmada; tuza toleransı yüksek 2 ticari patlıcan anacı üzerine aşılanan ve aşısız olarak kendikökleri üzerinde yetiştirilen 4 patlıcan genotipinin gelişme performansları, kuraklık ve tuz stresi koşulları altındaçiçeklenme öncesindeki bitki döneminde incelenmiştir. Bitkisel materyal olarak 4 patlıcan kalem genotipi (tuzatolerant: Mardin Kızıltepe, Burdur Merkez; tuza duyarlı: Artvin Hopa ve Kemer), 2 adet patlıcan anacı (Köksal-F1,Vista-306) kullanılmıştır. Toplam 12 farklı uygulamadaki bitkilere kuraklık ve tuzluluk uygulamaları ayrı ayrıyapılmış ve değerlendirilmiştir. Kuraklık stresi yarayışlı su seviyesi %50 düzeyinde tutularak; tuz stresi ise 6 dSm-1tuz seviyesinde sulama suyu uygulanarak oluşturulmuştur. Stres sonunda alınan bitki örnekleri; yeşil aksam yaş vekuru ağırlığı, kök yaş ve kuru ağırlığı, yaprak alanı, gövde çapı, gövde ve kök boyları bakımından incelenmiştir.Çalışmada, yeşil aksam yaş ve kuru ağırlık değerleri en yüksek olan kombinasyon Köksal F1/Kemer (284.42ve 50.59 g bitki-1) olarak belirlenirken, kuraklık stresi karşısında kök kuru ağırlığı %11.40 ile Köksal-F1/BurdurMerkez’de, tuz stresi altında ise %5.71 değeri ile Köksal-F1/Artvin Hopa’da en az değişim gerçekleşmiştirİncelenen özellikler bakımından aşılı bitkilerin kuraklık ve tuz stresi karşısında aşısızlara göre daha az kayıplarverdiği, Köksal-F1 anacı üzerine aşılamanın kuraklık ve tuz stresine dayanımda, Vista anacına göre daha etkiliolduğu sonucuna varılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAN, S., ATEŞ, Ç., KUŞVURAN, Ş., SÖNMEZ, K., ELLİATLIOĞLU, Ş. (2017). Investigation of changes on some morphological characteristics in different eggplant scion/rootstock combinations under salt and drought stresses.. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 43–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/256546

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abdalla MM, El-Khoshiban NH, 2007. The influence of water stress on growth, relative water content, photosynthetic pigments, some metabolic and hormonal contents of two Triticium aestivum cultivars. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(12): 2062-2074.
  2. Abdelmageed, AH, Gruda N, Geyer B, 2004. Effects of temperature and grafting on grwth and development of tomato plants under controlled conditions. Deutscher Tropentag 2004, Berlin. http://www.tropentag.de/2004/abstracts/full/106.pdf. (Erişim tarihi: 05 Ağustos, 2016). Altunlu H, 2011. Aşılamanın Domateste Kuraklık Stresine Etkileri. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İzmir, 204s. Anonim 2015. Food and Agricultural Organization FAO.http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/C/E. Erişim Tarihi: 11.8.2016. Anonymous 2016. Mechanisms of salt tolerance. http://agritech.tnau.ac.in./agriculture/ agri_salinity_tolerance.html (Erişim tarihi: 24.12.2015)
  3. Asraf M, Arfan M, Ahmad A, 2003. Salt tolerance in okra: Ion relations and gas exchanges characteristics. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 26 (1): 63-79.
  4. Asraf M, Iram A, 2005. Drought stress induced changes in some organic substances in nodules and other plant parts of two potential legumes differing in salt tolerance. Flora, 200: 535–546.
  5. Bertamini M, Zulini L, Muthuchelian K, Nedunchezhian N, 2006. Effect of water deficit on photosynthetic and other physiological responses in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling) plants. Photosynthetica, 44 (1): 151- 154. Canizares KAL, Goto R, Vilas BRL, 2000. Yield and nutrient content in Japanese cucumber grafted on squash. Horticultura Argentina, 19(47): 5-10.
  6. Chartzoulakis K, Klapaki G, 2000. Response of two greenhouse pepper hybrids to NaCl salinity during different growth stages. Scientia Horticulture, 86: 247-260.
  7. Çetin F, Fricke A, Stützel H, 2009. Interactions between tomato scion and rootstock varieties regarding growth and development under different water supply levels. Tropentag 2009, Biophysical and socio-economic frame conditions for the sustainable management of natural resources, October 6 - 8, Hamburg, Germany. Book of Abstracts, p:176, ID 955. Daşgan HY, Aktaş H, Abak K, Çakmak I, 2002. Determination of screening techniques to salinity tolerance in tomatoes and investigation of genotype responses. Plant Science, 163: 695-703.
  8. Daunay MC, Lester RN, Ano G, 2001. Eggplant. in:Tropical Plant Breeding (Eds: Charrier A, Jaquot M, Hamon S, Nicolas D). Science Publishers, Inc. Enfield (NH), USA, UK, pp:199