Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2008 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Plasma Modified Foley Catheters Against to Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection CAUTI

Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2008-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The obtained results showed that the plasma power affected hidrophilicity ofthe surface and wettability of the foley catheters was increased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study; the foley catheters were modified by plasma polymerization technique and coated with alginate gels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The obtained results showed that the plasma power affected hidrophilicity ofthe surface and wettability of the foley catheters was increased.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the numericalvalues of the obtained data; while the amount of bacterial colony formation unit was at 108 level initially, it wasdecreased down to 104-103level by changing the surface hydrophilicities as expected
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Foley catheter · plasma modification · Alginate

Abstract

In this study; the foley catheters were modified by plasma polymerization technique and coated with alginate gels. Thismodification processes were applied to prevent bacterial adhesion onto the foley catheter surfaces. Here the mosteffective parameters were evaluated as the plasma polymerization system power and plasma exposure time for theeffective catheter surface modification. The obtained results showed that the plasma power affected hidrophilicity ofthe surface and wettability of the foley catheters was increased. The plasma exposure time increased the amount ofEDA deposition over the catheter surfaces and then caused more hydrophilicity for the foley catheter surfaces also.In this study, the bacterial strain ofE. Coli had a hydrophobic nature and therefore the increase in hydrophilicity ofthe surface of foley catheters decreased the adhesion risk for theE. Coli onto the catheter surfaces. As the numericalvalues of the obtained data; while the amount of bacterial colony formation unit was at 108 level initially, it wasdecreased down to 104-103level by changing the surface hydrophilicities as expected

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞAN, G., DENKBAŞ, E. B., ÖZTÜRK, E., AĞALAR, C., EROĞLU, M., ATİLLA, P. (2008). Plasma Modified Foley Catheters Against to Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection CAUTI. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/256108

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Riedl C.R., Witkowski M., Plas E., Pflueger H., Heparin coating reduces encrustation of ureteral stents: a preliminary report, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 19 (2002) 507
  2. Schierholz J.M., Yücel N., Rump A.F.E., Beuth J, Pulverer G., Antiinfective and encrustation-inhibiting materials/myth and facts, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 19 (2002) 511
  3. Reid G., Davidson R., Denstedt D. XPS, SEM and EDX analysis of conditioning lm deposition onto ureteral stents, Surf Interface Anal, 21 (1994) 58
  4. Santin M., Motta A., Denyer S.P., Cannas M., Effect of the urine conditioning film on ureteral stent encrustation and characterization of its protein composition, Biomaterials, 20 (1999) 1245
  5. Elves AWS, Feneley RCL. Long-term urethral catheterization and the urine biomaterial interface, Br J Urol, 80 (1997) 1
  6. Schierholz JM, Beuth J. Sophisticated medical devices as local drug delivery systems, Med Dev Tech, 11(2) (2000) 12
  7. Schierholz JM, Beuth J. Implant infections haven for opportunistic bacteria, J Hosp Inf, 49 ( 2001) 87
  8. DiTizio V., Ferguson G.W., Mittelman M.W., Khoury A.E., Bruce A.W., DiCosmo F., A liposomal hydrogel for the prevention of bacterial adhesion to catheters, Biomaterials, 19 (1998) 1877
  9. Park J.H., Cho Y.W., Kwon I.C., Jeong S.Y., Bae Y.H., Assessment of PEO/PTMO multi block copolymer segmented polyurethane blends as coating materials for urinary catheters: in vitro bacterial adhesion and encrustation behavior, Biomaterials, 23 (2002) 399
  10. Kim C.K. and Lee E. J. Int. J. Pharm, 79 (1992) 11
  11. Downs E.C., Robertson N.E., Riss, T.L. and Plunkett M.L., J. Cell Phys., 152 (1992) 422
  12. Edelman E.R., Mathiowitz E., Langer R. and Klagsbrun M. Biomaterials, 12 (1991) 619
  13. Mumper R.J., Hoffman A.S., Puolakkainen P.A., Bouchard L.S. and Gombotz W.R., J. Control. Release, 30 (1994) 241
  14. Sandford P.A. and Hutchings G.P. In: Yalpani, M. (ed.), Industrial Polysaccharides, Genetic Engineering, Structure/Property Relations and Applications, (1987) 363
  15. Tunney M., David S., Jones, Sean P. Gorman. Methacrylate polymers and copolymers as urinary tract biomaterials: resistance to encrustation and microbial adhesion, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 151 (1997) 121
  16. Kiremitci-Gumusderelioglu M., Pesmen A. Microbial adhesion to ionogenic PHEMA, PU and PP implants, Biomaterials,17 (1996) 443
  17. Hubbell J.A., Heuberger M., Voros J., Textor M., Biomaterial surfaces: Properties and