Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2013 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2

Bioecology of the Wild Boar Sus scrofa Linnaeus 1758 in Kırıkkale Province, Turkey

Kırıkkale Türkiye İlindeki Yaban Domuzunun Sus scrofa Linnaeus 1758 Biyoekolojisi

Pages
143–150
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Morphometric data from specimens examined were consistent with the Turkish wild boar belonging to the nominate subspecies Sus scrofa scrofa but its taxonomy does merit further investigation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The bioecology of the wild boar Sus scrofa was studied in the Turkish province of Kırıkkale using field observations and examination of 21 specimens collected from 2001 to 2003.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Habitat, some breeding features, and morphometric data were recorded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Morphometric data from specimens examined were consistent with the Turkish wild boar belonging to the nominate subspecies Sus scrofa scrofa but its taxonomy does merit further investigation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 · 21 specimens
⚙️Variables:Yaban domuzu · Suidae · ekoloji

Abstract

The bioecology of the wild boar Sus scrofa was studied in the Turkish province of Kırıkkale using field observations and examination of 21 specimens collected from 2001 to 2003. Habitat, some breeding features, and morphometric data were recorded. The wild boar in Kırıkkale occurs mainly in forests, marshy areas and dense scrub. It selects scrub areas near hill tops as daytime resting sites. It feeds on some agricultural products in summer and is often hunted to prevent such damage. It produces its young in April and May. Morphometric data from specimens examined were consistent with the Turkish wild boar belonging to the nominate subspecies Sus scrofa scrofa but its taxonomy does merit further investigation.

Özet

Y aban domuzu, Sus scrofa’nın biyoekolojisi Türkiye’nin Kırıkkale ilinde yapılan arazi gözlemleri ve 2001 ila 2003 yıllarında toplanan 21 örneğin incelenmesi ile araştırıldı. Habitat, bazı üreme özellikleri ve morfometrik veri kaydedildi. Kırıkkale’deki yaban domuzu ormanlarda, bataklık alanlarda ve yoğun çalılıklarda bulunur. Yaban domuzu gündüz dinlenme yeri olarak tepelerin zirvesine yakın çalılık bölgeleri seçer. Kırıkkale’deki yaban domuzu yazın bazı tarım ürünleriyle beslenir ve bu gibi zararları önlemek için sık sık avlanır. Yaban domuzu nisan ve mayıs ayında yavru verir. İncelenen örneklerden elde edilen morfometrik veriler Türkiye yaban domuzunun ait olduğu nominatif alttür, Sus scrofa scrofa’ya uygunluk göstermekte, fakat yaban domuzunun taksonomisi için daha fazla araştırmaya gerek vardır

🔖

Cite This Article

İNCİ, S., ALBAYRAK, İ., WİLSON, C. J. (2013). Bioecology of the Wild Boar Sus scrofa Linnaeus 1758 in Kırıkkale Province, Turkey. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2, 143–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/255846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. R. Andrezejewski, W. Jezierski, Management of a wild boar population and its effects on commercial land, Acta Theriol., 23 (1978) 309. G.B. Corbet, H.N. Southern, The Handbook of British Mammals. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, (1977)
  2. M. Dardaillon, Seasonal variations in habitat selection and spatial distribution of wild boar in the camargue, southern France, Behavioural Processes, 13 (1986) 251. M. Dardaillon, Seasonal Feeding Habits of the Wild Boar in a Mediterranean Wetland, the Camargue (Southern France), Acta Theriologica, 32 (1987) 389. P.H. Davis, Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, 1 (1965-1985),
  3. Edinburgh University Press,
  4. Edinburgh. P.H. Davis, K. Tan, R.R. Mill, Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, 10 (1988),
  5. Edinburgh University Press,
  6. Edinburgh. A.A. Dönmez, Flora of Karagüney Mountain (Kırıkkale), Turk J. Bot., 26 (2002) 417. L.R. Ellerman, T.C.S. Morrison-Scott, 1951, Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals 1758 to 1946. British Museum (Natural History) Tonbridge Printers Ltd., Tonbridge. H. Epstein, The origin of the Domestic Animals of Africa, Africana Publishing Corp., New York, (1971).
  7. M. Eroğlu, Wild boar, Turkey’s most sought-after big game, Ibex J.M.E., 3 (1995) 227. P.V. Genov, Food composition of wild boar in North- eastern and Western Poland, Acta Theriol., 26 (1981) 185. P.V. Genov, Review of the cranial characteristics of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758), with systematic conclusions, Mamm. Rev., 29 (1999) 205. J.E. Gray, Synopsis of the species of Pigs (Suidae) in the British Museum, Proc. Scient. Meetings of the Zool. Soc. of London, (1868) 17. C. Groves, Ancestors for the pigs: taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Sus, Technical Bulletin No 3 Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, (1981).
  8. A. Güner, N. Özhatay, T. Ekim, K.H.C., Başer, Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, 11 (2000),
  9. Edinburgh University Press,
  10. Edinburgh. D.L. Harrison, P. J. J. Bates, The Mammals of Arabia, Harrison Zoological Museum, Lakeside Printing, England (1991).
  11. S. Huş, Av Hayvanlan ve Avcılık, Kurtulmuş Matbaası, İstanbul (1967).
  12. C. Lever, Naturalised Mammals of the World. Longman, Harlow, Essex (1985).
  13. J.J. Mayer, I.L. Brisbin, Wild Pigs in the United States, Their History, Comparative Morphology, and Current Status, The University of Georgia Press, Athens and London, (1991).
  14. E. Mohr, Wild Schweine, Ziemsen Verlag-Wittenberg Lutherstadt, Germany, More