Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2020 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Microfluidic Devices: A New Paradigm in Toxicity Studies

Pages
245–263
Publication Date
2020-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, we will focus on microfluidic systems being used in organ-on-a-chip systems and emphasize their potential for toxicity studies in which micro-environments of examples including liver,kidney,brain,lung,heart,and intestines and their physiological properties as reflected to organ-on-a-chip models.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, great emphasis has been placed on non-animal toxicological methods (e.g.in vitro models,in silico or −omics data) as alternative strategies to reduce animal-testing, in line with the 3R principle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These methods help in the rapid and accurate estimation of preclinical efficacy and safety associated with discovery of new drugs, and reduction of failure rates in clinical trials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, we will focus on microfluidic systems being used in organ-on-a-chip systems and emphasize their potential for toxicity studies in which micro-environments of examples including liver,kidney,brain,lung,heart,and intestines and their physiological properties as reflected to organ-on-a-chip models.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:microfluidics · organ-on-a-chip · toxicity testing

Abstract

In recent years, great emphasis has been placed on non-animal toxicological methods (e.g.in vitro models,in silico or −omics data) as alternative strategies to reduce animal-testing, in line with the 3R principle. These methods help in the rapid and accurate estimation of preclinical efficacy and safety associated with discovery of new drugs, and reduction of failure rates in clinical trials. Currently, the in vitro studies have been in a transformation or replacement from two-dimensional cell cultures to three-dimensional cell cultures that can mimic the physiology of tissues, organs, and organism. In this context, organ-on-a-chip systems have been developed by integration of three-dimensional culture models with emerging microfluidic technologies. The organ-on-a-chip systems provide a good understanding of dose-response and toxicity mechanisms in drug development process, since impact of xenobiotics on human body can be predicted in a satisfactory level. Besides, these systems may support assessment of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters as well as detection of drug resistance. Models can be generated as “disease-models-on-a-chip” or with healthy cells to evaluate response to xenobiotic under test. In this study, we will focus on microfluidic systems being used in organ-on-a-chip systems and emphasize their potential for toxicity studies in which micro-environments of examples including liver,kidney,brain,lung,heart,and intestines and their physiological properties as reflected to organ-on-a-chip models.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOŞGELMEZ, İ. İ., İÇÖZ, K., YİĞİT, F. E. (2020). Microfluidic Devices: A New Paradigm in Toxicity Studies. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 245–263. https://ajindex.com/articles/255688

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. S.N. Bhatia, D.E. Ingber, Microfluidic organs-on-chips, Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014) 760–772
  2. M.B. Esch, A.S.T. Smith, J.-M. Prot, C. Oleaga, J.J. Hickman, M.L. Shuler, How multi-organ microdevices can help foster drug development, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 69–70 (2014) 158–169
  3. C.M. Sakolish, M.B. Esch, J.J. Hickman, M.L. Shuler, G.J. Mahler, Modeling barrier tissues in vitro: Methods, Achievements, and Challenges, EBioMedicine. 5(2016) 30–39
  4. J.D. Caplin, N.G. Granados, M.R. James, R. Montazami, N. Hashemi, Microfluidic organ-on-a-chip technology for advancement of drug development and toxicology, Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4 (2015) 1426–1450
  5. R. Greek, A. Menache, Systematic Reviews of animal models: Methodology versus epistemology, Int. J. Med. Sci. 10 (2013) 206–221
  6. A. Skardal, T. Shupe, A. Atala, Organoid-on-a-chip and body-on-a-chip systems for drug screening and disease modeling, Drug Discov. Today. 21 (2016) 1399–1411
  7. L. Ewart, K. Fabre, A. Chakilam, Y. Dragan, D.B. Duignan, J. Eswaraka, J. Gan, P. Guzzie-Peck, M. Otieno, C.G. Jeong, D.A. Keller, S.M. de Morais, J.A. Phillips, W. Proctor, R. Sura, T. Van Vleet, D. Watson, Y. Will, D. Tagle, B. Berridge, Navigating tissue chips from development to dissemination: A pharmaceutical industry perspective, Exp. Biol. Med. 242 (2017) 1579–1585
  8. S. Ishida, Organs-on-a-chip: Current applications and consideration points for in vitro ADME-Tox studies, Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 33 (2018) 49–54
  9. H. Kimura, Y. Sakai, T. Fujii, Organ/body-on-a-chip based on microfluidic technology for drug discovery, Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 33 (2018) 43–48
  10. S. Lu, F. Cuzzucoli, J. Jiang, L.-G. Liang, Y. Wang, M. Kong, X. Zhao, W. Cui, J. Li, S. Wang, Development of a biomimetic liver tumor-on-a-chip model based on decellularized liver matrix for toxicity testing, Lab Chip. 18 (2018) 3379–3392
  11. J. Vriend, T.T.G. Nieskens, M.K. Vormann, B.T. van den Berge, A. van den Heuvel, F.G.M. Russel, L. Suter-Dick, H.L. Lanz, P. Vulto, R. Masereeuw, M.J. Wilmer, Screening of drug-transporter interactions in a 3D microfluidic renal proximal tubule on a chip, AAPS J. 20 (2018) 87
  12. M.K. Vormann, L. Gijzen, S. Hutter, L. Boot, A. Nicolas, A. van den Heuvel, J. Vriend, C.P. Ng, T.T.G. Nieskens, V. van Duinen, B. de Wagenaar, R. Masereeuw, L. Suter-Dick, S.J. Trietsch, M. Wilmer, J. Joore, P. Vulto, H.L. Lanz, Nephrotoxicity and kidney transport assessment on 3D perfused proximal tubules, AAPS J. 20 (20