Journals / Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges) / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

A STATISTICAL FEATURE EXTRACTION IN WAVELET DOMAIN FOR MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION: A CASE STUDY FOR EYES OPEN, EYES CLOSED, AND OPEN/CLOSED FIST TASKS

Pages
158–162
Publication Date
2018-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The best result is obtained by using k-NN.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Analysis of brain signals constitute an importance, especially for paralyzed people or people suffer from motor disabilities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this aim, some studies have been evaluated to measure signals from the scalp to provide non-muscle control arguments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The best result is obtained by using k-NN.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:EEG · electroencephalogram · wavelet transform

Abstract

Analysis of brain signals constitute an importance, especially for paralyzed people or people suffer from motor disabilities. For this aim, some studies have been evaluated to measure signals from the scalp to provide non-muscle control arguments. Brain-Computer Interface Systems turns these signals into device signals that are controllable at the level of thought. In this paper, we classify diverse tasks according to EEG (electroencephalogram) signals. Then pre-processing, feature extraction and classification steps are hold. For classification, we use FLDA, Linear SVM, Quadratic SVM, PCA, and k-NN methods. The best result is obtained by using k-NN.

Özet

Analysis of brain signals constitute an importance, especially for paralyzed people or people suffer from motor disabilities. For this aim, some studies have been evaluated to measure signals from the scalp to provide non-muscle control arguments. Brain-Computer Interface Systems turns these signals into device signals that are controllable at the level of thought. In this paper, we classify diverse tasks according to EEG (electroencephalogram) signals. Then pre-processing, feature extraction and classification steps are hold. For classification, we use FLDA, Linear SVM, Quadratic SVM, PCA, and k-NN methods. The best result is obtained by using k-NN.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, Ş., ERGİN, S. (2018). A STATISTICAL FEATURE EXTRACTION IN WAVELET DOMAIN FOR MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION: A CASE STUDY FOR EYES OPEN, EYES CLOSED, AND OPEN/CLOSED FIST TASKS. Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 158–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/252711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Farwell, L. A. and Donchin, E. (Dec. 1988). Talking off the top of your head: Toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroen- ceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 510–523, Dec. 1988
  2. Wolpaw, McFarland, D. J., Neat, G. W. and, Forneris, C. A. (Mar. 1991). An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 252–259
  3. Sutter, E. E. (1992). The brain response interface: Communication through visually guided electrical brain responses. J. Microcomput. Applicat., vol. 15, pp. 31–45
  4. McFarland, D. J., Neat, G. W. and, Wolpaw, J. R. (1993). An EEG-based method for graded cursor control. Psychobiol., vol. 21, pp. 77–81
  5. Pfurtscheller, Flotzinger, D. and, Kalcher, J. (1993). Brain-computer inter- face—A new communication device for handicapped persons. J. Mi- crocomput. Applicat., vol. 16, pp. 293–299
  6. Birbaumer, N., Ghanayim, N., Hinterberger, T., Iversen, I., Kotchoubey, B., Kubler, A., Perelmouter, J., Taub, E. and, Flor, H. (Mar. 1999). A spelling device for the paralyzed. Nature, vol. 398, no. 6725, pp. 297–298
  7. Kubler, A., Kotchoubey, B., Hinterberger, T., Ghanayim, N., Perel- mouter, J., Schauer, M., Fritsch, C., Taub, E. and, Birbaumer, N. (Jan. 1999) The thought translation device: A neurophysiological approach to communication in total motor paralysis. Exp. Brain Res., vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 223–232
  8. Kennedy, P. R., Bakay, R. A., Moore, M. M., and Goldwaithe, J. (June 2000). Direct control of a computer from the human central nervous system. IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng., vol. 8, pp. 198–202
  9. Schalk, G., McFarland, D.J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., Wolpaw, J.R., (2004). BCI2000: A General-Purpose Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51(6): 1034-1043
  10. Goldberger, A.L., Amaral, L.A.N., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J.M., Ivanov, PCh., Mark, R.G., Mietus, J.E., Moody, G.B., Peng, C-K, Stanley, H.E. (2000). PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals. Circulation, 101(23): e215-e220 [Circulation Electronic Pages]
  11. Cengiz, Y., Doç, Y., Ariöz, U. (2016). Ayrik dalgacik dönüsümü kullanarak konusma sinyallerinin gürültüden arindirilmasi için uygulama: An application for speech denoising using discrete wavelet transform [pdf]. Retrieved from
  12. Misiti, M.