SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama / 2013 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

STUDY OF SOME FACTORS RELATED TO FOCUSED TECHNIQUE: PHYSICS ACHIEVEMENT, LOGICAL THINKING SKILLS AND TASK SEQUENCE

ODAK TEKNİĞİN ORTAYA ÇIKMASINDA ETKİLİ OLABİLECEK BAZI FAKTÖRLERİN ARAŞTIRILMASI: BAŞARI, MANTIKSAL DÜŞÜNME YETENEĞİ VE İŞLEM TİPİ SIRASI

Burak TEMİZ
Ahmet YAVUZ
Pages
570–592
Publication Date
2013-06-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study it is showed that the focused technique is not stem from lack of knowledge in mechanics or limitation related to logical thinking skills.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate several factors that involve use of focused technique in calculating acceleration problems for mechanical system consisting of multiple components.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the focused technique that is not correct students focus on only one component and ignore others’ effect on motion by calculating acceleration of a component.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study it is showed that the focused technique is not stem from lack of knowledge in mechanics or limitation related to logical thinking skills.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fizik eğitimi · mekanikte problem çözme teknikleri · fizik dersi başarısı

Abstract

This study aims to investigate several factors that involve use of focused technique in calculating acceleration problems for mechanical system consisting of multiple components. In the focused technique that is not correct students focus on only one component and ignore others’ effect on motion by calculating acceleration of a component. In this study it is showed that the focused technique is not stem from lack of knowledge in mechanics or limitation related to logical thinking skills.

Özet

Bu çalışma, birden fazla parçadan oluşan mekanik düzeneklerde ivme bulma problemi için tanımlanan odak tekniğin ortaya çıkmasında etkili olabilecek bazı faktörleri araştırma amacıyla yapılmıştır. Odak teknik; birden fazla parçadan oluşan düzeneklerde, bir parçanın ivmesini hesaplarken sadece o parçaya odaklanılıp diğer parçaların harekete olan etkilerinin göz ardı edildiği, hatalı bir tekniktir. Çalışmada, odak tekniğin, öğrencilerin mekanik konularındaki bilgi eksikliklerden veya mantıksal düşünme yeteneklerindeki sınırlılıklardan kaynaklanmadığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMİZ, B., YAVUZ, A. (2013). STUDY OF SOME FACTORS RELATED TO FOCUSED TECHNIQUE: PHYSICS ACHIEVEMENT, LOGICAL THINKING SKILLS AND TASK SEQUENCE. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 570–592. https://ajindex.com/articles/250596

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bolton, J., & Ross, S. (1997). Developing students’ physics problem-solving skills. Physics Education, 32, 176. Bosch, M., Chevallard, Y., & Gascon, J. (2005). Science or magic? The use of models and theories in didactics of mathematics. In Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME4/CERME4_WG11.pdf
  2. Chevallard, Y. (1997). Familière et problématique, la figure du professeur. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 17(3), 17–54.
  3. Chevallard, Y. (1998). Analyse des pratiques enseignantes et didactique des mathématiques: L’approche anthropologique. Presented at the Actes de l’Université d’Eté, La Rochelle-France. Retrieved from http://yves.chevallard.free.fr/spip/spip/IMG/pdf/Analyse_des_pratiques_ enseignantes.pdf Chi, M.T.H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich, R.R. Hoffman, & K.A. Ericsson (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook Of Expertise And Expert Performance (pp. 21–30).
  4. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Çalışkan, S., Selçuk, G. S., & Erol, M. (2012). Instruction of Problem Solving Strategies: Effects on Physics Achievement and Self-Efficacy Beliefs. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/journals/index.php/jbse/article/view/156
  6. Çalışkan, Serap, Selçuk, G. S., & Erol, M. (2006). Fizik Öğretmen Adaylarının Problem Çözme Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi. H.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H.U. Journal of Education)., (30), 73–81.
  7. Fabre, M. (1999). Situations-Problèmes et savoir scolaire. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France (PUF). Geban, Ö., Askar, P., & Özkan, Ï. (1992). Effects of computer simulations and problem-solving approaches on high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(1), 5–10.
  8. Gündüz, Ş. (2008). Fizik Problemlerini Çözme Performansının Teşhise Yönelik Değerlendirilmesinde Bir Model Geliştirilmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi,
  9. İstanbul,
  10. Türkiye. Hobden, P. (1998). The Role of Routine Problem Tasks in Science Teaching. International handbook of science education, 1, 219. Johnson, M. A., & Lawson, A. E. (1998). What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of research in science teaching, 35(1), 89–103.
  11. Johsua, S., & Dupin, J.-J. (1999). Introduction à la didactique des sciences et des mathématiques. Paris: P