SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama / 2009 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

DİL ÖĞRENMEDE ÖZERKLİK: ÖĞRENCİLER KENDİ ÖĞRENME SORUMLULUKLARINI ÜSTLENEBİLİYORLAR MI?

Evrim ÜSTÜNLÜOĞLU
Pages
148–169
Publication Date
2013-01-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin ve öğretmenlerinin özerk öğrenmeye ilişkin yeterlilik ve

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin ve öğretmenlerinin özerk öğrenmeye ilişkin yeterlilik ve
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin ve öğretmenlerinin özerk öğrenmeye ilişkin yeterlilik ve
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin ve öğretmenlerinin özerk öğrenmeye ilişkin yeterlilik ve
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sorumluluk · Yeterlilik · Etkinlik

Özet

Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin ve öğretmenlerinin özerk öğrenmeye ilişkin yeterlilik ve

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜSTÜNLÜOĞLU, E. (2013). DİL ÖĞRENMEDE ÖZERKLİK: ÖĞRENCİLER KENDİ ÖĞRENME SORUMLULUKLARINI ÜSTLENEBİLİYORLAR MI?. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 148–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/250333

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aoki, N. (2000). Aspects of teacher autonomy: Capacity, freedom and responsibility. Paper presented at 2000 Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Language Centre Conference. Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. S. (1989). The construct validation of self-ratings of communicative language ability. Language Testing, 6(1), 14-29.
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Benson, P. (2000). Autonomy as a learners’ and teachers’ right. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb (eds.) Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions. London: Longman. 111-117.
  3. Blanche, P. (1990). Using standardized achievement and oral proficiency tests for self- assessment purposes: The DLIFC study. Language Testing. 7(2), 202-229.
  4. Brindley, G. (1990). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.) The second language curriculum (pp. 63- 78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Büyüköztürk, S. (1999). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin arastırma yeterlikleri. Eğitim Yonetimi Dergisi, 18, 257-69.
  6. Chan, V. Spratt, M., & Humphreys, G. (2002). Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students’ attitudes and behaviours. Evaluation and Research in Education. Vol.16, No.1. Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Council of Europe (2002). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Case studies. from www.culture2.coe.int-portfolio//documents/case-studies-CEF.doc Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self- Determination in Human behavior. New York: Plenum. Deci, E.L. (1995). Why we do what we do: The dynamics of personal autonomy. New York. Putnam’s Sons. Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation. System, 23 (2), 165. Erdoğan, S. (2003). Learner training via course books and teacher autonomy: A case of need. Retrieved March, 7, 2007, from http://lc.ust.hk/~ailasc/newsletters/onlinepaper/sultan.htm
  8. Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67-89.
  9. Evans, S. (1996). The context of English language education: The case of Hong Kong. RELC 27(2), 30-55.
  10. Fazey, D., & Fazey, J. (2001). The potential for autonomy in learning. Studies in Higher Education, 26 (3), 345. Gardner, D. (1999). Self-assessment for autonomous language learners. Retrieved January, 24, 20