Journals / Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Study Abroad and L2 Self-Efficacy Beliefs Scale

Yurt Dışı Eğitim ve İkinci Dil Öz-Yeterlik İnançları Ölçeği

Pages
215–230
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings obtained from this study reveal that the Study Abroad and L2 Self-Efficacy Beliefs Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to measure the projected self-efficacy beliefs and expectations of students who intend to attend a language course abroad.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to develop a data collection tool that will measure students' self-efficacy beliefs and expectations regarding the competencies they can achieve at the end of their language education abroad.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants of the study include 607 university students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings obtained from this study reveal that the Study Abroad and L2 Self-Efficacy Beliefs Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to measure the projected self-efficacy beliefs and expectations of students who intend to attend a language course abroad.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:öğrenci beklentileri · öğrenci inançları · ölçek geliştirme

Özet

The aim of this study is to develop a data collection tool that will measure students' self-efficacy beliefs and expectations regarding the competencies they can achieve at the end of their language education abroad. The participants of the study include 607 university students. Data were collected during the 2018-2019 academic year. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were applied to reveal the factor structure of the scale. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, a four-factor structure consisting of 24 items with eigenvalues greater than 1 emerged. These four factors explained 61.48% of the total variance. Factor load values of items varied between .50 and .79. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed on a second study group to confirm the four-factor structure obtained from the exploratory factor analysis. The fit indices that were examined in order to display the adequacy of the model indicated a good fit. The findings obtained from this study reveal that the Study Abroad and L2 Self-Efficacy Beliefs Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to measure the projected self-efficacy beliefs and expectations of students who intend to attend a language course abroad.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVENDİR, E., GÜVENDİR, M. A., DÜNDAR, S. (2020). Study Abroad and L2 Self-Efficacy Beliefs Scale. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 215–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/250256

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Allen, H. W., & Dupuy, B. (2012). Study abroad, foreign language use, and the communities standard. Foreign Language Annals, 45(4), 468-493.
  2. Amuzie, G. L., & Winke, P. (2009). Changes in language learning beliefs as a result of study abroad. System, 37(3), 366-379.
  3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155-173.
  4. Badstübner, T., & Ecke, P. (2009). Students’ expectations, target language use, and perceived learning progress in a summer study abroad program in Germany. Die Unterrichtspraxis: Teaching German, 42, 41-49.
  5. Balaman-Uçar, S. (2016). Türkiye bağlamında öz-yeterlik ve strateji kullanımı arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması. Current Research in Education, 2(3), 186-198.
  6. Balcı, A. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma teknikleri. Ankara:
  7. Pegem. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71-81).
  8. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21-41.
  10. Betz, N., & Hackett, G. (1986). Applications of self-efficacy theory to understanding career choice behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 279-289.
  11. Bonyadi, A., Nikou, F. R., & Shahbaz, S. (2012). The relationship between EFL learners’ self-efficacy beliefs and their language learning strategy use. English language teaching, 5(8), 113-121.
  12. British Council. (2012). Student insight Turkey. Access: http://ihe.britishcouncil.org/educationintelligence/student-insight-turkey
  13. British Council. (2013). International education perspective: Turkish students. Access: https://ei.britishcouncil.org/educationintelligence/importanceinternationaleducation-perspective-turkish-students
  14. Busse, V. (2013). An exploration of motivation and self-beliefs of first year students of German. System, 41(2), 379-398.
  15. Can, A. (2018). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara:
  16. Pegem. Chen, H. (2007). The relationship between EFL learners’ self-efficacy beliefs and performance (Unpublished doctoral disse