Journals / Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

The Role of Student Background and Science Motivational Beliefs in Academic Expectations of Turkish Students in TIMSS 2011

TIMSS 2011 Çalışmasına Katılan Türkiye’deki Öğrencilerin Akademik Beklentileri

Pages
159–165
Publication Date
2014-01-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some suggestions were provided for science teachers to promote their students’ self-efficacy beliefs and for parents to improve their involvement in schooling.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study examined eight grade Turkish students’ academic expectations in relation to gender, home educational resources, family involvement, and motivational beliefs of self-efficacy and task value in science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Six thousand three hundred and thirty one students who participated in TIMSS 2011 consisted of the sample of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some suggestions were provided for science teachers to promote their students’ self-efficacy beliefs and for parents to improve their involvement in schooling.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:academic expectation · gender · home educational resources

Abstract

The present study examined eight grade Turkish students’ academic expectations in relation to gender, home educational resources, family involvement, and motivational beliefs of self-efficacy and task value in science. Six thousand three hundred and thirty one students who participated in TIMSS 2011 consisted of the sample of the study. Logistic regression analyses results revealed that girls hold higher levels of expectations to attain university education than boys. Home educational resources, family involvement, and self-efficacy in science emerged as significant and positive predictors of students’ academic expectations, as well. Some suggestions were provided for science teachers to promote their students’ self-efficacy beliefs and for parents to improve their involvement in schooling.

🔖

Cite This Article

Taş, Y. (2014). The Role of Student Background and Science Motivational Beliefs in Academic Expectations of Turkish Students in TIMSS 2011. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 159–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/248509

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Astone, N. M., & Mclanahan, S. S. (1991). Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. American Sociological Review, 56, 309-320.
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Berberoğlu, G. (2007). Türk bakış açısından PISA araştırma sonuçları. etrieved from http www.konrad.org.tr Egitimturk 07girayberberoglu.pdf Berberoglu, G., Celebi, O., Ozdemir, E., Uysal, E., & Yayan, B. (2003). Factors effecting achievement level of Turkish students in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Educational Sciences and Practice, 2(3), 3-14.
  3. Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efŞcacy and task-value in predicting college students’ course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 553–570.
  4. Bui, K. (2007). Educational expectations and academic achievement among middle and high school students. Education, 127, 328-331.
  5. Erberber, E. (2009). Analyzing Turkey's data from TIMSS 2007 to investigate regional disparities in eighth grade science achievement. Published Doctorate Dissertation, Boston College. Hill, N. E., & Craft, S. A. (2003). Parent–school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro- American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 74-83.
  6. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215-225.
  7. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
  8. Hanson, S. L. (1994). Lost talent: Unrealized educational aspirations and expectations among US youths. Sociology of Education, 67, 159–183.
  9. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527. Joncas & Foy, (n.d.). Sample design in TIMSS and PIRLS. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/methods/t-sample-design.html
  10. Kahraman, N., & Sungur, S. (2011). The contribution of motivational beliefs to students’ metacognitive strategy use. Education and Science, 36, 3-10.
  11. Kalender, I., & Berberoglu, G. (2008). An assessment of factors related to science achievement of Turkish students. International Journal of Science Educ