Journals / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology / 2016 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS of Nannospalax leucodon (Nordmann, 1840) with 2n=60 DISTRIBUTED in CENTRAL ANATOLIA

Pages
33–55
Publication Date
2016-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The populations with different NF values distributed in different geographic areas in Central Anatolia were separated in CVA analysis and particularly populations in western parts of Central Anatolia were grouped separately than others

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz In this study, distribution areas of populations with different NF values (76, 78, 80, 82 and 84) belonging to 2n= 60 chromosomal forms of Nannospalax leucodon widely distributed in Central Anatolia were examined by using traditional morphometry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was determined that the populations with NF= 80 value had the widest distribution and is mostly distributed in the center of Central Anatolia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The populations with different NF values distributed in different geographic areas in Central Anatolia were separated in CVA analysis and particularly populations in western parts of Central Anatolia were grouped separately than others
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Nannospalax leucodon · Morphometry · Central Anatolia

Özet

Öz In this study, distribution areas of populations with different NF values (76, 78, 80, 82 and 84) belonging to 2n= 60 chromosomal forms of Nannospalax leucodon widely distributed in Central Anatolia were examined by using traditional morphometry. When findings from this study and other results obtained from previous karyological studies were evaluated together, it was observed that populations with different NF values were not randomly distributed in Central Anatolia. It was determined that the populations with NF= 80 value had the widest distribution and is mostly distributed in the center of Central Anatolia. It was seen that the populations with NF=76 and NF=78 values were found as small populations in northern and southern border of distribution area of the populations with NF=80. It was observed that populations having bigger NF values (NF=82 and 84) present as small populations in western border of the main populations with NF=80. Among populations having different NF values, 8 of the 34 morphometric characters were statistically significant among females of different populations, while 25 of those in male showed significant difference. Statistically, the mean values of 34 morphometric characters were found as highly important by MANOVA. The populations with different NF values distributed in different geographic areas in Central Anatolia were separated in CVA analysis and particularly populations in western parts of Central Anatolia were grouped separately than others

🔖

Cite This Article

SELVİ, E., KANKILIÇ, T., ŞEKER, P. S., ÇOLAK, E. (2016). MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS of Nannospalax leucodon (Nordmann, 1840) with 2n=60 DISTRIBUTED in CENTRAL ANATOLIA. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 33–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/247946

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. S. Gözenç, E. Gümüş ve G. Ertin, Türkiye Coğrafyası. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları: 1069 (1998) 1-13
  2. P.H. Davis, Disribution Patterns in Anatolia with particular Reference to Endemism, in Davis, Edit. Harper and Hedge, PlantLife of SW Asia, (1971) 15-27
  3. B. Çıplak, Türkiye Tettigoniidlerinin Anadolu Diyagonaline Göre Yayılışları ve Hareket Yeteneği (Kanat Uzunluğu) ile İlişkisi. II. Ulusal Entomoloji Kongresi Bildirileri, 28-31 Ocak 1992, Adana, (1992) 373- 385
  4. B. Çıplak, A. Demirsoy, and A.N. Bozcuk, Distribution of Orthoptera in Relation to the Anatolian Diagonal in Turkey. Articulata, 8(1): (1993) 1-20
  5. R. Bilgin, Back to the Suture: The distribution of intraspecific genetic diversity in and around Anatolia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12, (2011), 4080- 4103
  6. I. Savic, and B. Soldatovic, Distribution Range and Evolution of the Chromosomal Forms in the Spalacidae of the Balkan Peninsula and Bordering Regions. J. Biogeography, (1979), 6: 363-374
  7. E. Kıvanç, Türkiye Spalax’larının Coğrafik Varyasyonları. Ankara 72 (1988), 88 Sayfa
  8. M.D. Gülkaç, E. Yüksel, Türkiye’deki Spalax Tür ve Alttürlerinin Dağılımına ve Türleşmesine Coğrafik İzolasyonun Etkisi. Tr. J. of Zoology 23 (1999) Ek Sayı 2, 491-496
  9. A.M.C. Şengör, and Y. Yilmaz, Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics 75, (1981) 181–241
  10. N. Görür, F.Y. Oktay, I. Seymen, and A.M.C. Şengör, Palaeotectonic evolution of the Tuzgölü basin complex, Central Turkey: sedimentary record of a Neo-Tethyan closure. In: Dixon, J.E., Robertson, A.H.F. (Eds.), The Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean. Geological Society Special Publication No
  11. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. (1984) 467–482
  12. W.W. Hay, R. DeConto, C.N. Wold, K.M. Wilson, S. Voigt, M. Schulz, A. Wold-Rossby, W.-C. Dullo, A.B. Ronov, A.N. Baluk-hovsky, E. Soeding, Alternative global cretaceous paleogeography. In: Barrera, E., Johnson, C. (Eds.), The Evolution of Cretaceous Ocean/Climate Systems. Geological Society of America Special Paper 332, (1999) pp. 1–47
  13. T. Hrbek, K.N. Stölting, F. Bardakci, F. Küçük, R.H. Wildekamp, and A. Meyer, Plate tectonics and biogeographical patterns of the Pseudophoxinus (Pisces: Cypriniformes) species complex of central Anatolia, Turkey. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32 (2004) 297–308
  14. T. Hrbek, F. Küçük, T. Frickey, K.N. Stölting, R.H. Wildekamp, A. Meyer, Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the Aphanius (Pi