SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul / 2019 / Sayı: 68

Who is the Secretary to the Arbitral Tribunal ?

Hakem Heyeti Sekreteri Kimdir ?

Berk Hasan ÖZDEM
Pages
85–111
Publication Date
2020-01-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, it offers solutions for minimizing the risks that the parties may encounter.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The secretary to the arbitral tribunal/arbitral secretary is a person who works with the tribunal for the purpose of contributing to the process by carrying out the tasks entrusted to him/her by the arbitrators.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While the secretaries are appointed for the advantages they provide, practice of using arbitral secretaries may also entail risks that may provoke challenges or affect the smooth running of the proceedings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, it offers solutions for minimizing the risks that the parties may encounter.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Arbitration · Secretary · Intuitu personae

Abstract

The secretary to the arbitral tribunal/arbitral secretary is a person who works with the tribunal for the purpose of contributing to the process by carrying out the tasks entrusted to him/her by the arbitrators. While the secretaries are appointed for the advantages they provide, practice of using arbitral secretaries may also entail risks that may provoke challenges or affect the smooth running of the proceedings. After discussing the benefits and not-so-bright sides of such a practice, this paper examines the contradictory views on the permissible scope of secretaries’ activities by focusing on the discrepancies amongst the regulations of different arbitral institutions as well as on the relevant court decisions. Finally, it offers solutions for minimizing the risks that the parties may encounter.

Özet

Hakem heyeti sekreteri/hakem sekreteri, hakemler tarafından onlara verilen görevleri yerine getirerek tahkim yargılaması sürecine katkıda bulunmak amacıyla çalışan kişilerdir. Sekreterler tahkim yargılamasına sağlayacakları katkı için tayin edilmelerine rağmen, uygulamada sekreter kullanımı red taleplerine yol açabilecek veya sürecin düzgün işleyişini etkileyecek riskleri de beraberinde getirebilmektedir. Bu makalede, sekreter kullanımının yararları ve avantajlı olmayabilecek yönleri tartışıldıktan sonra çeşitli tahkim kurumlarının düzenlemelerindeki farklılıklara ve ilgili mahkeme kararlarına odaklanılarak sekreterlerin faaliyetlerinin kapsamına ilişkin çelişen görüşler incelenmektedir. Son olarak, karşılaşabileceği riskleri en aza indirmeleri için taraflara çözümler sunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEM, B. H. (2020). Who is the Secretary to the Arbitral Tribunal ?. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, Sayı: 68, 85–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/245577

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Afonso FS, The Fifth Arbitrator? The Role of Artificial Intelligence to Tribunals in International Arbitration (Lisbon Arbitration 18 décembre 2018) consulté le 10 septembre 2019. Aguilar-Alvarez G, ‘Foreword’ dans Conseil International pour l’Arbitrage Commercial, Young ICCA Guide on Arbitral Secretaries (The ICCA Reports No.1) (International Council for Commercial Arbitration 2014) vii Akıncı Z, Milletlerarası Tahkim (4e, Vedat Kitapçılık 2016).
  2. Alangoya YH, Medeni Usul Hukukumuzda Tahkimin Niteliği ve Denetlenmesi (İstanbul Üniversitesi 1973). Andersson S, ‘A Fourth Arbitrator or an Administrative Secretary? A Study on the Appointment and Authority of Arbitral Secretaries in Swedish Arbitral Proceedings’ (Mémoire de maîtrise en droit de l’arbitrage, Université d’Uppsala, 2015).
  3. Ashford P, Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2009). Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration, ACICA Guideline on the Use of Tribunal Secretaries consulté le 10 septembre 2019.
  4. Berger B et Kellerhals F, International and Domestic Arbitration in Switzerland (3e, Beck/Hart 2015)
  5. Berwin Leighton Paisner, Research based report on the use of tribunal secretaries in international commercial arbitration (2015 Berwin Leighton Paisner) consulté le 10 septembre 2019.
  6. Blackaby N et autres, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (6e, Oxford University Press 2015). Blavi F et Vial G, ‘The Tribunal Secretary in International Arbitrations’ (2017) 30 New York International Law Review 1. Boltenko O, ‘Stop Ignoring the Elephant in the Room!’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog 9 juin 2014) consulté le 10 septembre 2019.
  7. Born G, International Commercial Arbitration (2e, Kluwer Law International 2014). Caner BK, ‘Enerji Şartı Anlaşmasının Muvakkaten Uygulanması ve Anlaşmadan Çekilme Hakkında Bir Değerlendirme’ (2014)3 Ankara Barosu Dergisi 315. Cavalieros P, ‘La Confidentialité de l’Arbitrage’ (2006)2 Les Cahiers de l’Arbitrage 56. Chambre de Commerce Internationale Cour International d’Arbitrage, Note aux Parties et aux Tribunaux Arbitraux sur la Conduite de l’Arbitrage selon le Reglement d’Arbitrage CCI (Cour International d’Arbitrage 2019) consulté le 10 septembre 2019.
  8. Clay T, L’arbitre (Dalloz 2001). Commission des Nations Unies Pour le Droit Commercial International, Aide-mémoire de la CNUDCI sur l’organisation des procédures arbitrales (Mars 2012) consulté le 10 septembre 2019. Commission des Nations Unies Pour le Droit Commercial International ‘Draft No