Journals / European Oral Research / 2015 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

ANTIMICROBIAL AND STRUCTURAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION SOLUTIONS ON GUTTA-PERCHA CONES

Farklı Kök Kanalı Yıkama Solüsyonlarının Gütaperka Üzerindeki Yapısal ve Antimikrobiyal Etkileri

Pages
27–32
Publication Date
2015-03-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Irrigation solutions were found to have sterilized the GPCs after both 5 and 10 minutes of exposure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the alterations on the surface of gutta-percha cones (GPCs) on exposure to the different irrigation solutions and their possible antibacterial effect against Enterococcus faecalis. (E. faecalis) Materials and Methods: Disinfection ability of different solutions (5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, 1% peracetic acid, and QMix) were tested with 96 GPCs and the time of exposure to each solution was 5 and10 minutes, respectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After disinfection, GPCs were placed in tubes containing the medium and incubated at 37˚C for 7 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Irrigation solutions were found to have sterilized the GPCs after both 5 and 10 minutes of exposure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antimikrobiyal ajanlar · enerji dağılımlı x-ışını spektroskopisi · gütaperka

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the alterations on the surface of gutta-percha cones (GPCs) on exposure to the different irrigation solutions and their possible antibacterial effect against Enterococcus faecalis. (E. faecalis) Materials and Methods: Disinfection ability of different solutions (5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, 1% peracetic acid, and QMix) were tested with 96 GPCs and the time of exposure to each solution was 5 and10 minutes, respectively. GPCs used in this study were contaminated with E.faecalis. After disinfection, GPCs were placed in tubes containing the medium and incubated at 37˚C for 7 days. All tubes were visually checked for turbidity at 24-hour intervals. About 92 new GPCs were analyzed by means of SEM/EDS to assess the topography and chemical elements present on their surface. The data generated was analyzed using Pearson chi-square test, p<0.05.Results: There were no significant statistical differences in disinfection quality between the irrigation solutions used on GPCs contaminated with E. faecalis (p>0.05). SEM/EDS analyses showed no alteration in the superficial features of GPCs after treating with various irrigation solutions.Conclusion: QMix was found to be an effective agent for rapid disinfection of GPCs as well-known irrigation solutions. Irrigation solutions were found to have sterilized the GPCs after both 5 and 10 minutes of exposure.

Özet

Amaç : Farklı kök kanal yıkama solüsyonlarının Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) ile kontamine olan gütaperka konları (GPK) üzerindeki antibakteriyel ve yapısal etkilerinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Antimikrobiyal etkinliğin tespitinde 96 adet GPK kullanılmıştır. GPK, E.faecalis ile kontamine edildikten sonra, % 5.25’lik sodyum hipoklorit,% 2’lik klorheksidin,% 1’lik perasetik asit ve QMix solüsyonlarında 5 ve 10 dakika boyunca bekletilmişlerdir. Bu sürenin sonunda GPK besi ortamı içeren tüplere konularak 7 gün süreyle 37°C’de inkübe edilmiştir. Tüpler 24 saat arayla bulanıklık açısından kontrol edilerek bulgular kaydedilmiştir. Solüsyonların GPK üzerinde oluşturdukları yapısal ve kimyasal değişiklikler ilk çalışmada kullanılan konlardan bağımsız 92 adet konun SEM/EDS aracılığıyla incelenmesiyle tespit edilmiştir. Veriler Pearson ki-kare testi ile %95 güven aralığında karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Solüsyonlar arasında bulanıklık varlığı değerlendirmesi sonucu elde edilen antimikrobiyal etkinlik ve SEM/EDS ile ulaşılan yapısal değişiklik açısından anlamlı bir farklılık bulunamamıştır (p > 0.05). Sonuç: Yeni bir yıkama solüsyonu olan Qmix de GPKın dezenfeksiyonunda etkin bir ajan olarak bulunmuştur. Yıkama solüsyonları tüm ölçüm zamanlarında GPKnı sterilize etmişlerdir

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKER, S. A., ASLAN, H., UZUNOĞLU, E., ÖZÇELİK, B. (2015). ANTIMICROBIAL AND STRUCTURAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION SOLUTIONS ON GUTTA-PERCHA CONES. European Oral Research, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 27–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/243548

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. da Motta PG, de Figueiredo CB, Maltos S, Nicoli JR, Ribeiro Sobrinho AP, Maltos KL, Carvalhais HP. Efficacy of chemical sterilization and storage conditions of gutta-percha cones. Int Endod J 2001;34(6):435-439.
  2. Valois CR, Silva LP, Azevedo RB. Structural effects of sodium hypochlorite solutions on gutta-percha cones: atomic force microscopy study. J Endod 2005;31(10):749-751.
  3. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rocas IN, Valois CR. Apical sealing ability of five endodontic sealers. Aust Endod J 2001;27(1):33-35.
  4. Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Matsumoto CU, Rossi Vde P, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Souza Filho FJ. Disinfection of gutta-percha cones with chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100(4):512-517.
  5. Royal MJ, Williamson AE, Drake DR. Comparison of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, MTAD, and 2% chlorhexidine in the rapid disinfection of polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material. J Endod 2007;33(1):42-44.
  6. Subha N, Prabhakar V, Koshy M, Abinaya K, Prabu M, Thangavelu L. Efficacy of peracetic acid in rapid disinfection of Resilon and gutta-percha cones compared with sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, and povidone-iodine. J Endod 2013;39(10):1261-1264.
  7. Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 2001;34(6):424-428.
  8. Valois CR, Silva LP, Azevedo RB. Effects of 2% chlorhexidine and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite on gutta-percha cones studied by atomic force microscopy. Int Endod J 2005;38(7):425-429.
  9. Chassot AL, Poisl MI, Samuel SM. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of the efficacy of a peracetic acid-based disinfectant for decontamination of acrylic resins. Braz Dent J 2006;17(2):117-121.
  10. Stojicic S, Shen Y, Qian W, Johnson B, Haapasalo M. Antibacterial and smear layer removal ability of a novel irrigant, QMiX. Int Endod J 2012;45(4):363-371.
  11. Dai L, Khechen K, Khan S, Gillen B, Loushine BA, Wimmer CE, Gutmann JL, Pashley D, Tay FR. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris. J Endod 2011;37(1): 80-84.
  12. Valois CR, Silva LP, Azevedo RB, Costa ED Jr. Atomic force microscopy study of gutta-percha cone topography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98(2):250-255.
  13. Goldberg F, Gurfinkel J, Spielberg C. Microscopic study of standardized gutta-percha points. Oral Surg