SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Oral Research / 2014 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Retreatment with Nickel-Titanium Rotary InstrumentS

NİKEL-TİTANYUM DÖNER ALET SİSTEMLERİ İLE RETREATMENT

Ayça YILMAZ
Dilek HELVACIOĞLU YİĞİT
Pages
71–78
Publication Date
2014-04-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article reviews the current nickel-titanium retreatment systems, the technical characteristics of these systems, clinical application protocol and the studies investigating these systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nickel-titanium rotary instrument systems are used widely in endodontic practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The clinical success of these systems have been shown in many studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article reviews the current nickel-titanium retreatment systems, the technical characteristics of these systems, clinical application protocol and the studies investigating these systems.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kanal tedavisi tekrarı · R-Endo · Mtwo R ve D-RaCe retreatment sistemleri

Abstract

Nickel-titanium rotary instrument systems are used widely in endodontic practice. The clinical success of these systems have been shown in many studies. Retreatment is the one of the most challenging endodontic treatment procedures. Conventional nickel-titanium rotary instrument systems had been used for retreatment before, however problems associated with the clinical use of these systems have forced many companies to produce nickel-titanium systems specially for the retreatment. This article reviews the current nickel-titanium retreatment systems, the technical characteristics of these systems, clinical application protocol and the studies investigating these systems.

Özet

Günümüzde nikel-titanyum döner alet sistemleri endodonti pratiğinde rutin olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu tekniklerin şekillendirmedeki başarıları birçok çalışma ile gösterilmiştir. Endodontik tedavinin en zor işlemlerinden biri olan retreatment uygulamalarında öncelikle şekillendirme için üretilen nikeltitanyum döner alet sistemleri kullanılmış, fakat yaşanan sorunlar firmaları retreatment işlemine özel nikel-titanyum sistemler üretmeye yöneltmiştir. Bu makalede güncel nikel-titanyum retreatment döner alet sistemlerinin teknik özellikleri, uygulama prosedürleri ve bu konuda yapılmış çalışmalar derlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, A., YİĞİT, D. H. (2014). Retreatment with Nickel-Titanium Rotary InstrumentS. European Oral Research, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 71–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/243199

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Lin LM, Skribner JE, Gaengler P. Factors associated with endodontic treatment failures. J Endod 1992;18(12):625-7. Friedman S. Considerations and concepts of case selection in the management of post-treatment endodontic disease (treatment failure). Endodontic Topics 2002;1(1):54-78. Orstavik D. Time-course and risk analyses of the development and healing of chronic apical periodontitis in man. Int Endod J 1996;29(3):150-5.
  2. Friedman S, Stabholz A. Endodontic retreatment- case selection and technique. Part 1: criteria for case selection. J Endod 1986;12(1):28-33.
  3. Stabholz A, Friedman S. Endodontic retreatment- case selection and technique. Part 2. treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod 1988;14(12):607-14.
  4. Lumley P, Adams N, Tomson P. Root canal retreatment. In: Practical clinical endodontics, London: Churchil Livingstone, 2006, p.69-84. Siqueira JF Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001;34(1):1-10. Çiftçioglu E. Ni-Ti esaslı farklı döner şekillendirme sistemlerinin, eğri kök kanallarının şekillendirilmesindeki ve kök kanalı tedavisi tekrarındaki etkilerinin yatay ve dikey kesitler yardımıyla, invitro olarak karşılaştırılması. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, 2007.
  5. Ingle JI, Beveridge EE, Glick DH, Weichman JA. Endodontic success & failure: the Washington study. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, (Ed). Endodontics. 4th ed., Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994, p.21– 45. Bołtacz-Rzepkowska E, Pawlicka H. Radiographic features and outcome of root canal treatment carried out in the Łódź region of Poland. Int Endod J 2003;36(1):27-32.
  6. Lupi-Pegurier L, Bertrand MF, MullerBolla M, Rocca JP, Bolla M. Periapical status, prevalence and quality of endodontic treatment in and adult French population. Int Endod J 2002;35(8):690-7.
  7. Allen R, Newton CW, Brown CE Jr. A statistical analysis of surgical and nonsurgical endodontic retreatment cases. J Endod 1989;15(6):261–6.
  8. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990;16(10):498-504. (Çevrimiçi) http://www.micro-mega. com/anglais/produits/r-endo/instrument. php, Erişim Tarihi: 02 Kasım 2012. Dağlaroğlu R. Farklı Ni-Ti döner alet yöntemlerinin eğri köklerde kanal tedavisi tekrarı etkinliklerinin incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, 2007. (Çevrimiçi) http://www.dentsply.co.uk/ Produc