SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Oral Research / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3

Effect of fixed dental prosthesis on the brain functions of partially edentulous patients – pilot study with power spectrum density analysis

Uddipta Prafulla SAİKİA
N. Gopi CHANDER
Muthukumar BALASUBRAMANİAN
Pages
114–118
Publication Date
2021-01-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The study displayed improvement in brain function of partially edentulous patients with FDP rehabilitation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study was done to analyse the influence of fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) on brain function by analysing power spectral density of partially edentulous patients Materials and Methods: The study included unilateral missing mandibular molar replacement patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Power spectral density (PSD) analysis of EEG alpha waves was made pre- treatment, post treatment and 3 months after FDP treatment to analyse the brain function.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The study displayed improvement in brain function of partially edentulous patients with FDP rehabilitation
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Brain activity · Electroencephalogram · Fixed dental prosthesis

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done to analyse the influence of fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) on brain function by analysing power spectral density of partially edentulous patients Materials and Methods: The study included unilateral missing mandibular molar replacement patients. The patients were restored with three-unit metal ceramic FDP restorations. The cognitive function was analysed with a mental state questionnaire. Power spectral density (PSD) analysis of EEG alpha waves was made pre- treatment, post treatment and 3 months after FDP treatment to analyse the brain function. The data in various phases were obtained before and after chewing. The results were statistically analysed. Results: The mean pre and post treatment PSD was 0.0175 (SD ±0.0132) and 0.0178 (SD ±0.0135). The mean post treatment PSD after three months was 0.024 (SD± 0.019). The results were analysed with repeated ANOVA and were statistically significant.( P < 0.01). Conclusion: The study displayed improvement in brain function of partially edentulous patients with FDP rehabilitation

🔖

Cite This Article

SAİKİA, U. P., CHANDER, N. G., BALASUBRAMANİAN, M. (2021). Effect of fixed dental prosthesis on the brain functions of partially edentulous patients – pilot study with power spectrum density analysis. European Oral Research, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3, 114–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/242971

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Chanana H.B, Talwar P.P. Aging in India: Its socioeconomic and health implications. Asia Pac Popul J. 1987;2(3):23-38
  2. Weijenberg RA, Scherder EJ, Lobbezoo F. Mastication for the mind—The relationship between mastication and cognition in ageing and dementia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan 31; 35(3):483-97
  3. Bandodkar KA, Aras M. Psychological considerations for complete denture patients. J Indian ProsthodontSoc 2007;7:71-6 4. L. Backman, S. Jones, A.K. Bergere, J. Laukka, B. J. Small. Multiple cognitive deficits during the transition to Alzheimer’s disease. J Intern Med. 2004; 256: 195–204
  4. Okamoto N, Morikawa M, Okamoto K, Habu N, Iwamoto J, Tomioka K, Saeki K, Yanagi M, Amano N, Kurumatani N. Relationship of tooth loss to mild memory impairment and cognitive impairment: findings from the fujiwara-kyo study. Behav brain funct. 2010 Dec 31; 6(1):1
  5. Masakazu. Influence of the Functional Improvement of Complete Dentures on Brain Activity. J Jpn Prosthet Soc. 2008; 52：194-199
  6. Okamoto N. Effect of occlusal support by implant prostheses on brain function. J prosthodont Res. 2011 Oct 31; 55(4):206-13
  7. Jayant N. Acharya, Abeer Hani, Janna Cheek, ParthaThirumala, Tammy N. Tsuchidak. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 2: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature. J ClinNeurophysiol 2016;33: 308–311
  8. Perumal P, Chander GN, Anitha KV, Reddy JR, Muthukumar B. Power spectrum density analysis for the influence of complete denture on the brain function of edentulous patients - pilot study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Jun;8(3):187-93
  9. Sangappa SB. Patient satisfaction in prosthodontic treatment: multidimensional paradigm. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2012 Mar;12(1):21-6
  10. Tucha L, Koerts J. Gum chewing and cognition: an overview. NeurosciMedi. 2012 Sep 21; 3(03):243
  11. Allen AP, Smith AP. A review of the evidence that chewing gum affects stress, alertness and cognition. J BehavNeurosci Res. 2011; 9(1):7-23
  12. Kamiya K, Fumoto M, Kikuchi H, Sekiyama T, Mohri-Lkuzawa Y, Umino M, Arita H. Prolonged gum chewing evokes activation of the ventral part of prefrontal cortex and suppression of nociceptive responses: involvement of the serotonergic system. J Med Dent Sci. 2010 Mar; 57(1):35-43
  13. Hioki Y, Iinuma M, Kurata C, Ichihashi Y, Tamura Y, Kubo KY. Effects of early tooth loss on the hippocampus in senescence-accelerated mice. Pediatr Dent J. 2009 Dec 31;19(2):196-205
  14. Iinuma M, Kondo H, Kurahashi M, Ohnishi M