Journals / Istanbul Management Journal / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 76

-

TÜRK KAMU İHALE KANUNUNDA FİYAT İLE BİRLİKTE FİYAT DIŞI UNSURLARIN DA DİKKATE ALINDIĞI İHALE VE KAZANAN TEKLİF

Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2014-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study is aiming to help buying entities solve both problems and make this type of tenders prevalent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In Turkish Public Procurement Law, the type of tender in which non-price attributes are also taken into account together with the price, is used by governmental procurements especially for purchasing of high value engineering systems or projects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Even though this type of tenders brings numerous benefits for both suppliers and the buying entities they are rarely issued just because implementation principles are not clearly set and, the buying entities are delegated for setting the principles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study is aiming to help buying entities solve both problems and make this type of tenders prevalent.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Türk Kamu İhale Kanunu · ekonomik açıdan en avantajlı teklif · çoklu unsur

Abstract

In Turkish Public Procurement Law, the type of tender in which non-price attributes are also taken into account together with the price, is used by governmental procurements especially for purchasing of high value engineering systems or projects. Even though this type of tenders brings numerous benefits for both suppliers and the buying entities they are rarely issued just because implementation principles are not clearly set and, the buying entities are delegated for setting the principles. The most challenging issue for buying entities is, on one hand, to establish the principles of bidding for non price multiple attributes and, on the other hand to decide “the economically most advantageous bid” as identified in The Turkish Public Procurement Law. This study is aiming to help buying entities solve both problems and make this type of tenders prevalent.

Özet

Türk Kamu İhale Kanununda “Fiyat ile birlikte fiyat dışı unsurların da dikkate alındığı ihale” olarak anılan tür devlete ait satın almalarda özellikle de yüksek değerde mühendislik sistem veya projelerin alımında kullanılmaktadır. Bu ihale türünün hem tedarikçi hem de satın alan idarelere sayısız fayda sağlamasına rağmen uygulama esaslarının çok net olarak ortaya konmaması ve bunu yapmak üzere satın alan idarelerin yetkilendirilmesi yüzünden nadiren kullanıldığı görülmektedir. Satın alan idareler için bu tür ihalelerdeki en sorunlu husus, bir yandan fiyat dışı unsurlar için teklif verme esaslarını oluştururken diğer yandan da Türk Kamu İhale Kanununda tanımlanan “ekonomik açıdan en avantajlı teklifi” seçmektir. Bu çalışma, her iki sorunu da çözmede satın alan idarelere yardımcı olmak ve bu sayede bu tür ihalelerin yaygınlaşmasını sağlamak amacındadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇAKAR, N., YURDAKUL, H. (2014). -. Istanbul Management Journal, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 76, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/242762

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Associated General Contractors of America, White Paper on Reverse Auctions for Procurement of Construction, Erişim Linki http://www.agc.org/, 002013
  2. BİCHLER, M., 1998, "Decision Analysis - A Critical Enabler for Multi-attribute Auctions," presented at 12th Electronic Commerce Conference, Bled, Slovenia, Erişim linki: citeseerx.ist.psu.edu, 02.04.2014
  3. BİCHLER, M., M. Kaukal, ve A. Segev, 1999, "Multi-attribute auctions for electronic procurement," presented at First IBM IAC Workshop on Internet Based Negotiation Technologies, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA, Erişim linki: citeseerx.ist.psu.edu, 02.04.2014
  4. CHE, Y. K., 1993, "Design Competition through Multidimensional Auctions," Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 24, (1993), s. 668-680
  5. CHENG, Chi-Bin, 2008, “Solving a sealed-bid reverse auction problem by multiplecriterion decision-making methods”, Computer and Mathematics with Applications 56 (2008), s. 3261-3274
  6. COMPTE, Olivier, “The winner's curse with independent private values”, CERASENPC, 2002, (Çevrimiçi) www.enpc.fr/ceras/compte/winner, 02014
  7. DEMİRELLİ, Erhan, 2010, “Topsis çok kriterli karar verme sistemi:Türkiye’deki kamu bankaları üzerine bir uygulama” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi (5:1) 2010
  8. FARAHVASH, Pooya ve Altıok, Tayfur, 2008, ” Application of Multi-Dimensional Procurement Auction in Single-Period Inventory Model”, Annals OR 164 (1): (2008), s. 229-251 Genel Başvuru Sitesi. Erişim Linki: http://www.turkcebilgi.com/sozluk/ihale, 002012 Genel Başvuru Sitesi. Erişim Linki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_function_deployment, 02013
  9. HONG, Zong-You ve Wang Ding- Wei, 2011, “Bidding Strategies in Sealed-Bid Reverse Multi-attribute Auctions”, Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) China, Print ISBN:978-1-4244-8737-0, INSPEC Accession Number: 12143780, 2011, s.1762 – 1767 HWANG, C.L. ve K. Yoon, 1981, “Multiple Attribute Decision Making _ Methods and Applications”, A State-of-the-Art Survey, OCLC Number: 7277857, Sprinnger-Verlag, New York, NY, 1981.
  10. JAP, D. Sandy, 2007, “The impact of online, reverse auctions on buyer-supplier relationships” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 71, No. 1, (January 2007), s.146-159 KAMESHWARAN vd., 2007, ” Multiattribute electronic procurement using goal programming”, Elsevier, European Journal of Operational Research, 179 (2007), s. 518–536
  11. Kamu İhale Kanunu, Kanun No: 4734 (Değişiklikler işlenmiş), 22 Ocak 2002 tarih ve 24648 Sayılı Resmi Gazete, Erişim linki: http://www.ihale.gov.tr/Mevz