Journals / Istanbul Management Journal / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 77

-

ALGILANAN LİDER DESTEĞİ VE ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEK İLE İŞTEN AYRILMA NİYETİ İLİŞKİSİNDE ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEMENİN ARACILIK ROLÜ: İSTANBUL’DA KAMU ÇALIŞANLARI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Pages
136–157
Publication Date
2015-02-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the results showed the negative and significant relationship between perceived organizational support and intention to quit and perceived leader support and intention to quit.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to explore the relationship among perceived organizational support, perceived leader support, organizational identification and intention to quit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For investigating the relationship, a study was conducted with 341 employees from a public organizaiton in Istanbul, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the results showed the negative and significant relationship between perceived organizational support and intention to quit and perceived leader support and intention to quit.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Algılanan örgütsel destek · algılanan lider desteği · örgütsel özdeşleşme

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the relationship among perceived organizational support, perceived leader support, organizational identification and intention to quit. For investigating the relationship, a study was conducted with 341 employees from a public organizaiton in Istanbul, Turkey. After the analysis, it can be seen that perceived organizational and leader support increase significantly the level of organizational identification. In addition, the results showed the negative and significant relationship between perceived organizational support and intention to quit and perceived leader support and intention to quit. Also, there is a partial mediating effect of organizational identification among these interactions

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı algılanan örgütsel destek, algılanan lider desteği, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve işten ayrılma niyeti değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiyi açıklamaktır. İlişkilerin sorgulanmasında, İstanbul’da faaliyet gösteren bir kamu kuruluşunda çalışan 341 kişi üzerinde bir uygulama gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada, algılanan örgütsel desteğin ve lider desteğinin, örgütsel özdeşleşme aracılığıyla işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkileri sorgulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel desteğin ve lider desteğinin örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeyini anlamlı olarak artırdığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca, çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel destek ve lider desteği ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasında negatif ve anlamlı ilişkiler belirlenmiştir. Algılanan örgütsel destek ve lider desteğinin işten ayrılma niyetine etkisinde örgütsel özdeşleşmenin kısmi aracılık etkisi olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Fındıklı, M. A. (2015). -. Istanbul Management Journal, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 77, 136–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/242740

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ACKFELDT, Anna Lena ve COOTE, Leonard V., 2005, “A Study of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in a Retail Setting”, Journal of Business Research, 58, s:151– 159. ALLEN, Natalie J. ve MEYER, John P., 1990, “The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, s:1–18.
  2. ARMELI, Stephen, EISENBERGER, Robert, FASOLO, Peter ve LYNECH, Patrick, 1998, “Perceived Organizational Support of Police Performance: The Moderating Influence of Sociemotional Needs”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83,s: 288-297.
  3. ASHFORTH, Blake E. ve MAEL, Fred, 1989, “Social identity and the organization”, Academy of Management Review, 14, s:20–39.
  4. BABIN, Barry J. ve BOLES, James S., 1996, “The Effects of Perceived Co-worker Involvement and Supervisor Support on Service Provider Role Stress, Performance and Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Retailing, 72(1), s:57-76.
  5. BECKER, Thomas E., 1992, “Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making?”, The Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), s:232–244.
  6. BARANIK, Lisa E., ROLING, L.T. ve EBY, L.E., 2010, “Why does mentoring work? The role of perceived organizational support”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, s:366– 3 BLAU, Peter M., 1964,
  7. Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: John Willey. BROWN, Robin R., 1986, “Individual, situational, and demographic factors predicting faculty commitment to the university”. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Oregon: University of Oregon. CHEUNG, Millissa F.Y., LAW, Monica C.C., 2008, “Relationships of Organizational Justice and Organizational Identification: The Mediating Effects of Perceived Organizational Support in Hong Kong”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(2), s:213-231.
  8. CHO, Seonghee, JOHANSON, Misty M., ve GUCHAIT, Priyanko, 2009, “Employees intent to leave: A comparison of determinants of intent to leave versus intent to stay”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28, s: 374–381.
  9. COTTON, John L. ve TUTTLE, Jeffrey M., 1986, “Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research”, The Academy of Management Review, 11(1), s:55–70.
  10. DUTTON, Jane E., DUKERICH Janet M. ve HARQUAIL, Celia V., 1994, “Organizational Images and Membership Commitment”, Administrative Science Quarterly,34, s:191-206.
  11. EISENBERGER, Robert, HUNTINGTON, Robin, HUTCHISON, Steven ve SOWA, Debora, 1986, “Perceived organizational support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, s:500–507.
  12. ERDOĞAN, İlhan,