SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Istanbul Management Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 78

FIXED VS. FLOATING: UNDER WHICH EXCHANGE RATE REGIMES PPP HOLDS-AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON TURKISH ECONOMY

Vedat Sarıkovanlık
Musa Gün
Pages
100–118
Publication Date
2015-08-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The evidence points out PPP held under the floating exchange rate regime.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Exchange rates are among the important indicators that affect the economic activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is well known that sharp changes occurring in the exchange rates affect severely the course of economic activities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The evidence points out PPP held under the floating exchange rate regime.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Döviz Kuru Rejimi · Satın alma Gücü Paritesi · Koentegrasyon

Abstract

Exchange rates are among the important indicators that affect the economic activities. It is well known that sharp changes occurring in the exchange rates affect severely the course of economic activities. In Turkey throughout 1990s, exchange rate policy is especially used as a tool to balance the Turkish economy. After severe costs of fixed exchange rate system, Turkey has adopted floating system in 2001. This study provides new empirical evidence regarding the impact of alternative exchange rate regimes on Turkish economy. The methodology that is used is EG cointegration and Johansen VAR techniques. The evidence points out PPP held under the floating exchange rate regime.

Özet

Ekonomik faaliyetleri etkileyen en önemli faktörlerden birisi döviz kuru seviyesidir. Çalkantılı dönemlerde gözlemlenen hızlı kur değişimleri ekonomik faaliyet ve sonuçları etkilemektedir. Türkiye’de 1990’lı yıllarda döviz kuru politikaları ile ekonomik sonuçlar dengelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Sabit kur rejiminin yarattığı sarsıcı etkileri sonucu dalgalı kur rejimine geçilmiştir. Bu çalışmada farklı kur rejimlerin Türkiye ekonomisi üzerindeki etkileri ko-entegrasyon ve VAR yöntemleri ile irdelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak satın alma gücü paritesinin (PPP) dalgalı kur rejiminde geçerli olduğu görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

Sarıkovanlık, V., Gün, M. (2015). FIXED VS. FLOATING: UNDER WHICH EXCHANGE RATE REGIMES PPP HOLDS-AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON TURKISH ECONOMY. Istanbul Management Journal, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 78, 100–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/242695

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alba, J. D. and Park, D., 2005, “An empirical investigation of purchasing power parity (PPP) for Turkey”, Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 27, 989-1000.
  2. Asteriou, D., Hall, S.G., “Applied Econometrics”, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
  3. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Mirzai, A., 2000, “Real and nominal effective exchange rates for developing countries: 1973: 1-1997: 3”, Applied Economics, 32(4), 411- 4 Brooks, C., 2008, Introductory Econometrics for Finance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2ndEdition, pp: 341, 350, 351,355,356,359. B. Bossone, 2008, IMF Surveillance: A Case Study on IMF Governance, Independent Evaluation Office of theInternetionalMonetaryFund Background Paper. Cassel, G., 1918, “Abnormal Deviations in International Exchanges”, Economic Journal, vol.28, 413-428. Cerrato,M. and N.Sarantis, 2007, “Symmetry, Proportionality and the Purchasing Power Parity: Evidence from Panel Cointegration Tests”, International Review of Economics and Finance, forthcoming. Chakrabarti, A., 2006, “Real Exchange Rates and Real Interest Rates Once Again: A Multivariate Panel Cointegration Analysis”, Applied Economics, 28, pp: 1217-1221.
  4. Chen, S.L., Wu, J.L., 2000, “A re-examination of purchasing power parity in Japan and Taiwan”, Journal of Macroeconomic, 22 (2), 271–284.
  5. Cheung, Y.W., Lai, K.S., Bergman, M., 2004, “Dissecting the PPP puzzle: the unconventional roles of nominal exchange rate and price adjustments”, Journal of International Economics, 64, 135–150.
  6. Crowder, J.W., 1996, “A reexamination of long-run PPP: the case of Canada, the UK, and the US”, Review of International Economics, 4, 64–78.
  7. Cushman, D.O., 2008, “Real exchange rates may have nonlinear trends”, International Journal of Finance and Economics, 13 (2), 158–173.
  8. Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A., 1979, “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, p. 427-431.
  9. Enders, W., 1989, “Unit roots and the reel exchange rate before World War I: the case of Britain and the USA”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 8, 59– Enders, W., Dibooglu, S., 2001, “Long run purchasing power parity with asymmetric adjustment”, Southern Economic Journal, vol.68, issue 2, pp. 433-445.
  10. Engle, R.F. and Granger, C. W.J, 1987, “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing”, Econometrica, 55, 251–76. Erlat H., 2003, “The Nature of Persistence in Turkish Real Exchange Rates”, Emerging Markets Finance and Tra