Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

The Implementation of WebQuest-supported Critical Thinking Instruction in Pre-service English Teacher Education: The Turkish Context

Pages
144–157
Publication Date
2019-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings revealed that the WebQuest-supported critical thinking instruction produced statistically significant differences in the PTs’ critical thinking disposition levels and the PTs demonstrated clearer awareness of critical thinking at the end of the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Critical thinking, a vital skill for the 21st century, has become a desirable educational outcome by educators.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Promoting students’ critical thinking has been a concern in various educational settings and the role of teachers is considered to be the most significant factor for successful instructional implementations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings revealed that the WebQuest-supported critical thinking instruction produced statistically significant differences in the PTs’ critical thinking disposition levels and the PTs demonstrated clearer awareness of critical thinking at the end of the study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:critical thinking · WebQuest · pre-service teachers

Abstract

Critical thinking, a vital skill for the 21st century, has become a desirable educational outcome by educators. Promoting students’ critical thinking has been a concern in various educational settings and the role of teachers is considered to be the most significant factor for successful instructional implementations. The present study aims to examine the effects of WebQuest-supported critical thinking instruction on the critical thinking disposition levels of Turkish pre-service teachers (PTs) of English and to determine whether receiving WebQuest-supported critical thinking instruction leads to a change in the PTs’ understanding of critical thinking. Data were collected from 60 freshman PTs studying at a state university in Istanbul, Turkey. Thirty PTs were assigned to the experimental group and received WebQuest-supported critical thinking instruction, while 30 PTs were assigned to the control group and received traditional text-only instruction. The study lasted seven weeks and data were collected by means of the Turkish version of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory and semi-structured focus group interviews conducted before and after the treatment. Findings revealed that the WebQuest-supported critical thinking instruction produced statistically significant differences in the PTs’ critical thinking disposition levels and the PTs demonstrated clearer awareness of critical thinking at the end of the study.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAM, D., KURT, G., ATAY, D. (2019). The Implementation of WebQuest-supported Critical Thinking Instruction in Pre-service English Teacher Education: The Turkish Context. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 144–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/239309

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aydede, M. N., & Kesercioglu, T. (2010). The effect of active learning applications on students' critical thinking skills. Dokuz Eylül University Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 27, 14-22.
  2. Bakir, S. (2015). Critical thinking dispositions of pre-service teachers. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(2), 225-233.
  3. Beyer, B. K. (2008). What research tells us about teaching thinking skills. The Social Studies, 99(5), 223-232.
  4. Biber, A. C., Tuna, A., & Incikabi, L. (2013). An investigation of critical thinking dispositions of Mathematics teacher candidates. Educational Research, 4(2), 109-117.
  5. Bizri, Z. A. (2010). The effect of language WebQuest on the higher order thinking skills of Lebanese high school students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon. Cubukcu, F. (2011). Critical thinking strategies in reading. Porta Linguarum, 16, 7-17.
  6. Dodge, B. (1997). Some thoughts about WebQuests. Retrieved from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html
  7. Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2012). An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments. Metacognition and Learning, 7(3), 219-244.
  8. Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4-10.
  9. Facione, P. A., & Facione, N. C. (1992). The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
  10. Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. (1996). The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory Test Manual. Milbrae, CA, California Academic Press.
  11. Gambrill, E. (2006). Critical thinking in clinical practice: Improving the quality of judgments and decisions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Halpern, D. F. (2003). Thought & knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed). London: Laurance Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  12. Horvath, C. P. & Forte, J. M. (2011). Critical thinking. Nova Science Publishers Incorporated. Kamin, C., O'Sullivan, P., & Deterding, R. (2002). Does Project L.I.V.E. case modality impact critical thinking in PBL groups?. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Kanuka, H. (2005). An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a textbased internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). Retrieved from http:/