Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

An analysis of online privacy concerns of teacher candidates

Pages
15–25
Publication Date
2019-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However there was no significant difference in online privacy concerns in terms of information and communication technologies usage levels, weekly Internet usage times, gender, department, age and mobile usage level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Examining the online privacy concerns of our prospective teachers who will raise our future generations is important in terms of determining and increasing the awareness levels of prospective teachers of the digital world and for the development of a conscious generation having this awareness while raising students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study, whose aim is to analyze online confidentiality concerns of prospective teachers in terms of various variables, consists of 92 teacher candidates who were studying in Necmettin Erbakan University of Konya in 2018-2019 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However there was no significant difference in online privacy concerns in terms of information and communication technologies usage levels, weekly Internet usage times, gender, department, age and mobile usage level.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:online privacy · teacher candidates · anxiety

Abstract

Examining the online privacy concerns of our prospective teachers who will raise our future generations is important in terms of determining and increasing the awareness levels of prospective teachers of the digital world and for the development of a conscious generation having this awareness while raising students. The definition of cyber space or virtual environments has further expanded; digital business applications, online services, online training systems, e-commerce sites, social media sites, and surely multiplayer video games have also been included in the definition. The definition of these digital spaces as virtual spaces creates questions as to how individuals exist in these places and how they travel in these places. This study, whose aim is to analyze online confidentiality concerns of prospective teachers in terms of various variables, consists of 92 teacher candidates who were studying in Necmettin Erbakan University of Konya in 2018-2019 academic year. In this study, where quantitative research was adopted, surveying model was used as a research method. The data collection tool was “The Online Privacy Concern Scale (OPCS)” developed. Descriptive statistics, Independent samples t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used during the analysis. It is found out that online privacy concerns of teacher candidates differ significantly in terms of mobile device usage times and classes. However there was no significant difference in online privacy concerns in terms of information and communication technologies usage levels, weekly Internet usage times, gender, department, age and mobile usage level.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORUCU, A. T., GÜRKEZ, Ş. (2019). An analysis of online privacy concerns of teacher candidates. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 15–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/239298

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alakurt, T. (2017). Adaptation of Online Privacy Concern Scale into Turkish culture. Pegem Journal of Education and Training, 7(4), 611-636.
  2. Aslanyürek, M. (2016). İnternet ve sosyal medya kullanıcılarının internet güvenliği ve çevrimiçi gizlilik ile ilgili kanaatleri ve farkındalıkları [Opinion and awareness of internet and social media users about internet security and online privacy]. Journal of Maltepe University Faculty of Communication, 3(1), 80–106.
  3. Benedikt, M. (1991) Cyberspace: First steps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. Bergström, A. (2015). Online privacy concerns: A Broad approach to understanding the concerns of different groups for different uses. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 419–426.
  5. Çelikoğlu N. (2008). Mahremiyet [Privacy]. İskenderiye Pub., İstanbul.
  6. Derin, G. D., & Yurtdaş, G. T. (2017). Facebook kullanmama tercihinin kendini açma biçimi ve etkileşim kaygısı bağlamında incelenmesi [Investigation of not using Facebook in the context of self-disclosure and interaction anxiety]. Journal of Communication Theory and Research, 1(45), 25–44.
  7. De Wolf, R., Willaert, K. & Pierson, J. (2014). Managing privacy boundaries to gether: Exploring individual and group privacy management strategies in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 444-454.
  8. Hoy, M. G. & Milne, G. (2010). Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(2), 28-45.
  9. Karaarslan, E., Eren, M. B., & Koç, S. (2014). Çevrimiçi Mahremiyet: Teknik ve Hukuksal Durum İncelemesi [Online Privacy: Technical and Legal Situation Review]. Internet Conference Proceedings in Turkey, İzmir.
  10. Külcü, Ö. & Henkoğlu, T. (2014). Privacy in social networks: An analysis of Facebook. International Journal of Information Management, 34, 761-769.
  11. Külcü, Ö., & Henkoğlu, T. (2015). Privacy on Social Networks: Facebook Review. Information World, 15(2). Metin, M. (2014). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Scientific Research Methods in Education from Theory to Practice]. Ankara:
  12. Pegem Academy Publishing. Raad, E., & Chbeir, R. (2013).
  13. Privacy in online social networks, In R. Chbeir, & B. Al Bouna (Eds.), Security and Privacy Preserving in Social Networks (pp. 3-45). Springer, http://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/docs/00/97/59/98/PDF/Privacy_in_Online_Social_Networks.pdf (Erişim: 23-07-2014)
  14. Şener, G. (2013). Sosyal ağlarda mahremiyet ve yeni mahremiyet stratejileri [Privacy and new privacy strategies in social networks]. Fir