SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

A Scale Development Study To Determine The Self-efficacy Perception Of Students On Written Exams

Gürbüz OCAK
İjlal OCAK
Nil AKYOL
Pages
53–67
Publication Date
2016-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study shows that the scale has a valid and reliable form.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Institutions such as The ministry of Education and student selection and placement center place importance on assessment and evaluation techniques in recent years to measure efficacy of students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The validity and the reliability of the scale is done on the data gained from 305 students elected by the method of convenience sampling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study shows that the scale has a valid and reliable form.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:written examination · self-efficacy · assessment and evaluation

Abstract

Institutions such as The ministry of Education and student selection and placement center place importance on assessment and evaluation techniques in recent years to measure efficacy of students. The institutions are trying to carry out written examinations and provide the adaptation of students to this kind of evaluation technique. In this study, general survey model is used. The application scale of the self-efficacy towards written examination was developed in the direction of Mamak Anatolia high school and Sehit Piyade Er Murat Eroglu secondary school students. The validity and the reliability of the scale is done on the data gained from 305 students elected by the method of convenience sampling. At first, the scale was prepared as 61 items. Then 36 items are taken out related to factor analysis and 25 items left eventually. KMO (Kaiser-Meyer Olkin ) value is 0.870 and the value of (Cronbach alpha) calculated for the reliability study is .887. As a result of factorial validity of the scale, items change between .416 and .722. According to the factor analysis results, three factors are found. These factors are ‘self-confidence’, ’higher order thinking’ and ‘effort’. This study shows that the scale has a valid and reliable form.

🔖

Cite This Article

OCAK, G., OCAK, İ., AKYOL, N. (2016). A Scale Development Study To Determine The Self-efficacy Perception Of Students On Written Exams. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 53–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/239250

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ali, S.M. (2013). Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI): Factor Analysis and Psychometric Properties. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8 (1), 73-81. Atalay,O. ve Köksal,B.(2015).Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri.Konya:Eğitim Kitabevi. Bandura,A.(1993).Perceived Self-efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning.Educational Pscychologist,28(2),117-148.
  2. Blackwood, J. (2006). How to design and evaulate research in education.http://highered.mheducation.com/sites/0072532491/student_view0/chapter17/main_points.htmladresinden 25.05.2016 tarihinde alınmıştır. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Cresswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design:choosing among five approaches.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications. Demirel, Ö. (2015). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Program Geliştirme. Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi yayıncılık. Duman, B.(2014).Eleştirel Düşünme.G. Ocak (Ed). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri (445-468). Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi yayıncılık. Ergün, M. (1995). Bilimsel Araştırmalarda Bilgisayarla İstatistik Uygulamaları. Ankara: Ocak yayınları. Erözkan,A.(2004).Üniveriste öğrencilerinin sınav kaygısı ve başa çıkma davranışları.SBE Dergisi,12,34-38.
  6. Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve Veri SPPS ile veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık Gülbahar,Y. ve Büyüköztürk,Ş.(2008).Değerlendirme tercihleri ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması.Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,35,148-161. McMillan,J.H.(2015).Sınıf içi değerlendirme.(Çev. Ed.A. Arı).Konya:Eğitim Yayınevi.
  7. MEB.(2016).Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. http://abide.meb.gov.tr/ adresinden 30.03.2016 tarihinde alınmıştır. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı(MEB).(2012).Biçimine göre sorular.http://www.megep.meb.gov.tr/mte_program_modul/moduller_pdf/Bi%C3%A7imine%20G%C3%B6re%20Sorular adresinden 10.04.2016tarihinde alınmıştır. OSYM.(2015).Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi.http://www.osym.gov.tr/belge/1-23308/yazili-sinav-acik-uclu-sorularla-sinav-04022015.htmladresinden alınmıştır. Sullivan, G.M. & Artino, A.R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from likert type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541-542.
  8. Tezbaşaran, A. A. (2008). Likert Tipi Ölçek Geliştirme Kılavuzu. Ankara:
  9. TPD Yayınları.
  10. TDK. (2016).Türk Dil Kurumu. http://www.tdk.gov.tr adresinden 31.03.2016 tarihinde alınmıştır. Temizkan, M. ve Sallabaş,M.Y.(2011).Okuduğunu anlama becerisinin değerlendirilmesinde çoktan seçmeli testlerle açık uçlu yazılı yoklamaların karşılaştırılması.Dumlupınar Ün