SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Başarıda Anahtar Kelime: Öz-yeterlik

Gönül SAKIZ
Pages
185–210
Publication Date
2013-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further, based on the related research, suggestions were provided for improving students’ academic self-efficacy beliefs in educational environments

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A great deal of scientific research conducted around the world for more than 40 years has shown that the concept of self-efficacy is one of the most powerful factors influencing students’ academic performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Turkey, research related to self-efficacy has been increased in recent years but the studies conducted on this concept have primarily involved higher education level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further, based on the related research, suggestions were provided for improving students’ academic self-efficacy beliefs in educational environments
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Self-efficacy · Sources of self-efficacy · Improving perceived self-efficacy in learning environments

Abstract

A great deal of scientific research conducted around the world for more than 40 years has shown that the concept of self-efficacy is one of the most powerful factors influencing students’ academic performance. In Turkey, research related to self-efficacy has been increased in recent years but the studies conducted on this concept have primarily involved higher education level. The literature regarding self-efficacy as well as research, guidance and suggestions for improving students’ self-efficacy in learning environments are rather limited. The purpose of the current study was to construct a scientific background related to the concept of self-efficacy and to provide suggestions for improving students’ self-efficacy in learning environments. Literature review method was used for this investigation. The sections cover the development and the importance of self-efficacy concept, the factors associated with self-efficacy, the sources of self-efficacy and the theoretical and the empirical research on academic self-efficacy in learning environments. Further, based on the related research, suggestions were provided for improving students’ academic self-efficacy beliefs in educational environments

Özet

yeterlik kavramı kırk yılı aşkın bir süredir dünya çapında yapılan pek çok bilimsel araştırmada öğrenci başarısında en etkili faktörlerin başında gösterilmektedir. Ülkemizde öz-yeterlik üzerine yapılan çalışmalarda son yıllarda artış görülmekle beraber araştırmalar çoğunlukla yükseköğretim düzeyini kapsamaktadır. Öz-yeterlik kavramına ilişkin alanyazın, öğrenme ortamlarında özyeterlik algısının geliştirilmesine yönelik çalışmalar, yönlendirme ve öneriler oldukça sınırlıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı alanyazın taraması yönteminden faydalanarak, öz-yeterlik kavramına ilişkin bilimsel bir altyapı oluşturmak ve eğitim ortamlarında öğrencilerin öz-yeterlik algılarının geliştirilmesine yönelik önerilerde bulunmaktır. Araştırmada öz-yeterlik kavramının gelişimi ve önemi, ilişkili faktörler, öz-yeterlik kaynakları ve öğrenme ortamlarında akademik öz-yeterlik üzerine kuramsal ve deneysel çalışmalar paylaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, yapılan araştırmalardan yola çıkılarak eğitim ortamlarında öğrencilerin akademik özyeterliklerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik önerilerde bulunulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

SAKIZ, G. (2013). Başarıda Anahtar Kelime: Öz-yeterlik. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 185–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/23921

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akbulut, E. 2006. Müzik öğretmeni adaylarının mesleklerine ilişkin öz yeterlik inançları. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3, 24-33.
  2. Alivernini, F., and Lucidi, F. 2011. Relationship between social context, self-efficacy, motivation, academic achievement, and intention to drop out of high school: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Educational Research, 104, 241-252.
  3. Arslan, A. 2012. Predictive power of the sources of primary school students’ self-efficacy beliefs on their self-efficacy beliefs for learning and performance. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12, 1915-1920.
  4. Aşkar, P. ve Umay, A. 2001. İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz-yeterlik algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 1-8.
  5. Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  6. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
  7. Bandura, A. 1993. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologists, 28, 117-148.
  8. Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. Bandura, A. 2006. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares ve T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp.307-337).
  9. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/self-efficacy.html 06.12.2012 tarihinde erişilmiştir. adresinden Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., and Pastorelli, C. 1996. Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206-1222.
  10. Berkant, H. G. ve Ekici, G. 2007. Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının fen öğretiminde öğretmen öz yeterlik inanç düzeyleri ile zeka türleri arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16, 113-132.
  11. Boekaerts, M. 1997. Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161-186.
  12. Boggiano, A. K., Main, D. S., and Katz, P. A. (1988). Children’s preference for challenge: The role of perceived competence and control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 134-141.
  13. Bong, M. August, 2012. Toward conceptual clarity, empiric