Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Secondary School Students’ Basic STEM Skill Levels according to their Self-Perceptions: A Scale Adaptation

Pages
423–437
Publication Date
2021-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is a similarity between students’ genders in science and engineering - technology factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In addition to the studies on what the 21st century skills are, how these skills will be gained by the students, that is, after completing the K-12 and university education, the problem of how the students will graduate with these skills has become one of the most important questions waiting for an answer all over the world and it has been an issue for the world of education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants were 501 middle school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is a similarity between students’ genders in science and engineering - technology factors.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:STEM · Skill · Self-perception

Abstract

In addition to the studies on what the 21st century skills are, how these skills will be gained by the students, that is, after completing the K-12 and university education, the problem of how the students will graduate with these skills has become one of the most important questions waiting for an answer all over the world and it has been an issue for the world of education. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education approach has the potential to respond to these questions to some extent. The purpose of this study is to adapt ‘the basic STEM skills level self-perception’ scale which was formerly designed to measure the STEM skills levels of the university students within their self- perception, to the secondary school level and define secondary school students’ basic STEM skills levels within their self-perception. This study was conducted in a descriptive survey model. The participants were 501 middle school students. Data of this study were collected using the “Basic STEM Skill Levels Perception Scale”. Exploratory factor analysis was run to figure out the construct validity of the instrument. Item discrimination was tested by observing the differentiation between groups of 27% and top 27%. As a result: ‘Basic STEM Skill Levels Scale’ was adapted to the level of secondary school. The scale is a 7-point Likert-type scale containing of 23 items that can be categorized three factors. Within their self-perceptions, students’ basic STEM skills in science and mathematics are at intermediate level. However, it is seen that the basic STEM skills related to the field of engineering and technology are relatively low. There is a similarity between students’ genders in science and engineering - technology factors.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, Ö., ÇAKIR, R., ERDOĞMUŞ, F. U. (2021). Secondary School Students’ Basic STEM Skill Levels according to their Self-Perceptions: A Scale Adaptation. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 423–437. https://ajindex.com/articles/239170

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Çorlu, M., Öner, T., & Özdemir, S. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu: “Günümüz modası mı yoksa gereksinim mi?” [A report on STEM Education in Turkey: A provisional agenda or a necessity? White Paper] İstanbul: İstanbul Aydın University STEM Centre. Ananiadou, K. & Claro M. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
  2. Balcı, A. (2009). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler [Research in social science: Methods, techniques and principles]. Ankara:
  3. PegemA Pub. Becker, K. H., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research. 12 (5), 23-37.
  4. Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102-112.
  5. Butz, W. P., Kelly, T. K., Adamson, D. M., Bloom, G. A., Fossum, D., & Gross, M. E. (2004). Will the scientific and technology workforce meet the requirements of the federal government? Pittsburgh, PA: RAND Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Ankara:
  6. PegemA Press.
  7. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
  8. Carmines, E.G. & Zeller, R.A. (1982). Reliability and validity assessment. 5th ed. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc. Christensen, R. & Knezek, G. (2017). Relationship of middle school student STEM interest to career intent. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 3(1), 1-13.
  9. Cotabish, A., Dailey, D., Robinson, A. & Hughes, G. (2013). The Effects of a STEM Intervention on Elementary Students' Science Knowledge and Skills. School Science and Mathematics. 113(5), 215-226.
  10. Çakır, R. & Ozan, CE (2018). The effect of stem applications on 7th grade students’ academic achievement, reflective thinking skills and motivations. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty GUJGEF 38(3), 1077-1100
  11. English, L.D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.
  12. Eroğlu, A. (2008). Faktör analizi [Factor analyses]. In: Kalaycı, Ş. (ed), SPSS Uygula