Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Motivation to Teach: A Mixed Method Study

Pages
227–251
Publication Date
2021-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study, various recommendations such as supporting teachers, appreciation of their work, and showing respect were presented in the study to improve the motivation to teach of the teachers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aimed to investigate the motivation to teach of the teachers and to determine the factors that affect motivation to teach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample included 157 teachers who were selected with the convenience sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study, various recommendations such as supporting teachers, appreciation of their work, and showing respect were presented in the study to improve the motivation to teach of the teachers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:motivation to teach · teacher · student

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the motivation to teach of the teachers and to determine the factors that affect motivation to teach. Convergent parallel mixed design was used in the study. The study sample included 157 teachers who were selected with the convenience sampling method. A data collection instrument that consisted of three sections was used to collect the study data. In the first part of the instrument, questions about personal variables and school stakeholders (administrator, colleague, student and parents) are included. In the second part, "Teaching Motivation Scale" developed by Kauffman, Yılmaz-Soylu and Duke (2011) and adapted into Turkish by Ayık, Ataş-Akdemir and Seçer (2015) takes place. In the third part, there are two open-ended questions created by the researcher. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, one-way analysis of variance, and content analysis were used to analyze the study data. In the study, it was observed that quantitative and qualitative findings were generally consistent. It was determined that attitudes and behavior of school administrators, students, colleagues, and parents towards the teachers and attitudes and behavior of the students towards the course were the factors that affected the motivation to teach of the teachers. It was determined that the marital status and professional seniority of the teachers did not affect the motivation to teach of the teachers. While quantitative findings demonstrated that gender affected extrinsic motivation to teach, there was no qualitative evidence that gender affected motivation to teach. In the study, various recommendations such as supporting teachers, appreciation of their work, and showing respect were presented in the study to improve the motivation to teach of the teachers.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANLI, S., KARADAĞ, N. (2021). Motivation to Teach: A Mixed Method Study. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 227–251. https://ajindex.com/articles/239074

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ada, Ş., Akan, D., Ayık, A., Yıldırım, İ. & Yalçın, S. (2013). Öğretmenlerin motivasyon etkenleri. [Motivation factors of teachers]. Atatürk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 17 (3), 151-166.
  2. Akbaba, S. (2006). Eğitimde motivasyon. [Motivation in education]. Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 13, 343-361.
  3. Akman, Y. (2017). Öğretmenlerin algılarına göre iş motivasyonu ve örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between work motivation and organisational identification according to perceptions of teachers]. Journal of the Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education, 14-1(27), 71-88.
  4. Argon, T. & Cicioğlu, M. (2017). Meslek lisesi öğretmenlerinin eğitime inanma düzeyleri ile öğretme motivasyonları. [ Vocational high school teachers’ levels of belief in education and motivation to teach]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 57, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS7108
  5. Arslan, M. C. (2012). İlköğretim okul müdürlerinin demokratik tutum ve davranışlarının öğretmen motivasyonu ve öğrenci başarısına etkisi. [The effect of primary school principals of democratic attitudes and behaviors on teacher motivation and student performance]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Gaziantep University, Institute of Social Sciences, Gaziantep. Atkinson, E. S. (2000) An investigation into the relationship between teacher motivation and pupil motivation. Educational Psychology, 20(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/014434100110371
  6. Ayık, A., Ataş-Akdemir, Ö. & Seçer, İ. (2015). Öğretme motivasyonu ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. [ Adaptation of the motivation to teach scale into Turkish: The validity and reliability study]. Current Research in Education, 1(1), 33-45.
  7. Barbieri, G., Rossetti, C. & Sestito, P. (2017). Teacher motivation and student learning. Politica Economica, 33(1), 59-72.
  8. Bishay, A. (1996). Teacher motivation and job satisfaction: A study employing the experience sampling method. Journal of Undergraduate Sciences, 3, 147-154.
  9. Börü, N. (2018). The factors affecting teacher motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 761-776.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni ve Spss uygulamaları. [Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design and Spss applications ]. Ankara:
  11. Pegem Akademi. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. [S