Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Collaborative Group Activities in The Context of Learning Styles on Web 2.0 Environments: An Experimental Study

Pages
407–420
Publication Date
2021-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Similar studies can be conducted by using the learning style inventory based on different theories.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to determine the learning styles of Web 2.0 based collaborative group activities; to examine the effects on academic achievement, online cooperative learning attitude level, computer thinking skill level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted for 10 weeks in the 2019-2020 academic year, within the scope of Information Technologies and Software course, with 83 6th grade students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Similar studies can be conducted by using the learning style inventory based on different theories.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:online collaborative learning · web 2.0 environments · learning styles

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the learning styles of Web 2.0 based collaborative group activities; to examine the effects on academic achievement, online cooperative learning attitude level, computer thinking skill level. The research was carried out with a quantitative method and a pretest-posttest control group quasi-experimental design was used. Data were collected through Computational Thinking Skill Level scale, Online Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale and academic achievement test. The research was conducted for 10 weeks in the 2019-2020 academic year, within the scope of Information Technologies and Software course, with 83 6th grade students. The experimental group consists of 43 students and the control group consists of 40 students. In the research, one of the learning style theories, Kolb Learning Style model was used. In the experimental group, Web 2.0 based activities developed by the researcher were applied and the experimental group students produced content with Web 2.0 tools. In the control group, the lesson was taught in the way the current program suggested in schools. As a result, a meaningful difference was determined between students' academic achievement scores, online cooperative attitude levels, computer thinking levels and learning styles. According to these variables, the students with the discriminating learning style show the highest success. In addition, as a result of the research, it was determined that there are some features and developments other than the learning style feature in students. Learning environments other than the learning path of the learning style can be provided. Similar studies can be conducted by using the learning style inventory based on different theories.

🔖

Cite This Article

PÜRBUDAK, A., USTA, E. (2021). Collaborative Group Activities in The Context of Learning Styles on Web 2.0 Environments: An Experimental Study. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 407–420. https://ajindex.com/articles/239055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ağca, R. K. (2006). The Effects of Different Navigation Structures Based upon Learning Styles on the Success of the Student in Hypermedia Environments. Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences. Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies. Master's thesis. Ankara.
  2. Aşkar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Education and Science, 87 (17), 37–47.
  3. Brickell, G. (1993). Navigation and learning style. Australlian Journal Of Educational Technology, 9(2), 103–114.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Manual of data analysis for social sciences. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Academy. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2018). Scientific Research Methods in Education (25th ed.). Ankara:
  6. Pegem Academy. Durdu, L., & Durdu, P. O. (2016). Online Learning Environments. In K. Çağıltay & Y. Göktaş (Eds.), Fundamentals of Instructional Technologies (2nd ed., Pp. 523–525). Ankara:
  7. Pegem Academy. Driscoll, M. (2002). Web-Based Training: Creating E-Learning Experiences (2nd ed.). San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer. Ekici, G. (2003). Lesson Plan Examples for Teaching Based on Learning Style and Biology Lesson. Ankara:
  8. Gazi Publishing House. Ergül, H. (2006). Motivation Structures Affecting Academic Achievement in Online Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5 (1), 13.124-128.
  9. Gencel, İ. E. (2007). The Study of Adapting Kolb's Learning Styles Inventory-III Based on Experiential Learning Theory into Turkish. Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Social Sciences Journal, 9 (2), 120–139.
  10. Gudawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2003). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Reseach on Educational Communications and Technology (2nd Editio). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Hargadon, S. (2009). White Paper on Educational Networking: The important role Web 2.0 will play in education. Retrieved from http://www.elluminate.com
  11. Horzum, M. B. (2010). Investigating teachers’ Web 2.0 tools awareness, frequency and purposes of usage in terms of different variables. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7 (1), 603–634.
  12. Kolb, D. A. (1999). Learning Style Inventory: Version 3. Boston, MA: Hay/McBer Training Resources Group. Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). A validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS). Computer & Education, 59(4), 162–1169. https://doi.org/Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.021 Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2015). Investigating tea