Journals / Research Journal of Business and Management / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

A STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES ON STAKEHOLDERS RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT AND STAKEHOLDER BEHAVIOR

Pages
234–247
Publication Date
2016-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to ensure the continuity of the business and implementation of its activities, the businesses should evaluate and analyse the main stakeholders thoroughly and fulfil necessary responsibilities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the 21st century, the businesses can communicate and share information rapidly and efficiently by using technologies that are in constant development and change and can gain more at less cost.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The concept of stakeholder management is very important for the businesses in terms of their position, their corporate structure, which customer groups effect the businesses, how they could survive and be successful, and how they would respond to the needs and requirements of the stakeholders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to ensure the continuity of the business and implementation of its activities, the businesses should evaluate and analyse the main stakeholders thoroughly and fulfil necessary responsibilities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Competitive strategies · strategy · stakeholders

Abstract

In the 21st century, the businesses can communicate and share information rapidly and efficiently by using technologies that are in constant development and change and can gain more at less cost. These developments and changes in the business world force us to reconsider the stakeholder concept in more detail and in a comprehensive manner and to examine the need for more open and clear management style. The concept of stakeholder management is very important for the businesses in terms of their position, their corporate structure, which customer groups effect the businesses, how they could survive and be successful, and how they would respond to the needs and requirements of the stakeholders. When we examine the stakeholder concept in traditional sense, we can see that the stakeholders such as the employees, shareholders, suppliers, customers, society, non-governmental organizations, government and media have a significant effect on businesses. In this study, the employees were examined as a primary stakeholder and a research carried out to understand how their attitudes and behaviours were effected from competitive strategies. In order to ensure the continuity of the business and implementation of its activities, the businesses should evaluate and analyse the main stakeholders thoroughly and fulfil necessary responsibilities.

🔖

Cite This Article

Adiguzel, Z., Zehir, C. (2016). A STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES ON STAKEHOLDERS RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT AND STAKEHOLDER BEHAVIOR. Research Journal of Business and Management, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 234–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/238868

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Azmat & Samaratunga, 2009, “The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 88, pp. 175–197
  2. Bono, Edward De, 1996, “Rekabetüstü”, Çev. Oya Özel, Remzi Kitabevi, Brickson, 2007, “Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value”, Academy of Management, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 864-888
  3. Byung Il Park, Agnieszka Chidlow, Jiyul Choi, 2014, “Corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders influence on MNEs’ activities”, International Business Review, pp. 1-14 Celuch, 2002, “The effects of perceived market and learning orientation on assessed organizational capabilities”, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 545–554
  4. Chang, Shih-Chia, Lin, Neng-Pai, Yang, Chen-Lung and Sheu, Chewn. 2003, “Quality dimensions, capabilities ve business strategy: an empirical study in high-tech industry”, Total Quality Management, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 407-421
  5. Chaston, Ian, Mangles, Terry, 1997, “Core capabilities as predictors of growth potential in small manufacturing firms”, Journal of Small Business Management pp. 47-57. Cindy McCauley & Michael Wakefield, 2006, “Talent Management in the 21st Century: Help Your Company Find, Develop And Keep its Strongest Workers”, The Journal For Quality and Participation, vol. 29, no. 4, p.4 David A.Aaker, 1996, “Building Strong Brands”, The Free Press, A division of simon & Schuster Inc. Dess G. & Davies Beard, 1984, “Dimensions of organizational task environments”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 29, pp. 52–73. Duane, 1999, “Conflict Management in Buyer-Seller Relationships”, University of Florida, p. 127 Eren, Erol, 2002, “Stratejik Yönetim ve Isletme Politikasi”, Beta Basim, Istanbul. Freeman, R. Edward, 1984, “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach”, Pitman, Boston, p. 276 R. Edward Freeman, 2010, “Strategic management: A stakeholder approach”, Cambridge University Press Freeman, R. Edward, Fitil & Parmar, 2004, “The Stakeholder Approach Revisited”, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftund Unternehmensethik, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 228-241 Friedman & Miles, 2002, “Developing Stakeholder Theory”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–21
  6. Grant, Robert M, 1991, “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation”, California Management Review, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 114–135
  7. Jansson, Eva, 2005, “The Stakeholder Model: The Influence of the Ownership and Governance Structures”, Journa