SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Research Journal of Business and Management / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDIATOR EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACTING VIOLATIONS AND ORGANIZATIONAL EXTERNALITY ON JOB SATISFACTION

Melike Artar
Zafer Adiguzel
Oya Erdil
Pages
514–526
Publication Date
2017-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In additional, organizational justice mediate the relationship between psychological contract violation and organizational exclusion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective- The relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction is investigated in our work, especially when organizational exclusion and psychological contract violations have been experienced by occupations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology- The study's survey was applied to 258 white-collar employees of 5 high-performance firms operating in the production sector in Turkey in 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In additional, organizational justice mediate the relationship between psychological contract violation and organizational exclusion.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Psychological contract violation · organizational exclusion · organizational justice

Abstract

Objective- The relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction is investigated in our work, especially when organizational exclusion and psychological contract violations have been experienced by occupations. Methodology- The study's survey was applied to 258 white-collar employees of 5 high-performance firms operating in the production sector in Turkey in 2017. The data obtained from the questionnaires were analyzed by SPSS statistical package software. Findings- Organizational exclusion and psychological contract violations affect organizational justice, and organizational justice has increased the level of job satisfaction in institutions. In organizations where organizational justice exists, it appears that employees show positive attitudes and that employees are more willing to carry out the goals and objectives of the organization when they are treated fairly.Conclusion- Psychological contract violation and organizational exclusion are related with job satisfaction. In additional, organizational justice mediate the relationship between psychological contract violation and organizational exclusion.

🔖

Cite This Article

Artar, M., Adiguzel, Z., Erdil, O. (2017). INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDIATOR EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACTING VIOLATIONS AND ORGANIZATIONAL EXTERNALITY ON JOB SATISFACTION. Research Journal of Business and Management, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 514–526. https://ajindex.com/articles/238877

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adams, J. S. 1965, ‘‘Inequity İn Social Exchange’’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, ss. 267-299.
  2. Anderson, N. & Schalk, R. 1998, ‘‘The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect’’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, ss. 637– 647. Argyris, C. 1960, Understanding Organizational Behaviour, Homewood, I11: Dorsey. Aykaç, A. 2010, ‘‘İş Doyumunun Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerindeki Etkisi’’, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
  3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. 2007, ‘‘Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı’’, Ankara:
  4. Pegem Yayıncılık. Carter-Sowell, A. R., Chen, Z., & Williams, K. D. 2008, ‘‘Ostracism İncreases Social Susceptibility’’, Social Influence, 3, ss. 143-153.
  5. Cihangiroğlu, N., Şahin, B. & Naktiyok, A. 2012, “Hekimlerin Örgütsel Adalet Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 6 (12), ss. 67-82.
  6. Çetin, A., Güleç, R. & Kayasandık, A. E. 2015, ‘‘The Effect Of Ethical Climate Perception On Employees Turnover Intention: The Mediator Role Of Burnout’’, Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges, ss. 18-31.
  7. Cropanzano, R. Bowen, D. & Gilliland, M. 2007, ‘‘The Management of Organizational Justice’’, Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, ss. 34-48.
  8. Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. & Chen, P. Y. 2002, ‘‘Using Social Exchange Theory To Distinguish Procedural Justice From İnteractional Justice’’ Group and Organizational Management, 27, ss. 324 –351. Cohen-Charash, Y. & Spector, E. 2001, ‘‘The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis’’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, ss. 278–321.
  9. Davis, K. 1988, İşletmelerde İnsan Davranışı Örgütsel Davranış, Çev. Kemal TOSUN ve diğerleri, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Yayını, Yayın No 199. De Vos, A., Buyens, D. & Chalk, R. 2003, ‘‘Making Sense Of A New Employment Relationship: Psychological Contract- Related İnformation Seeking And The Role Of Work Values And Locus Of Control’’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13 (1), ss. 41-52.
  10. Deniz, M. 2005, ‘‘Bir Tutum Çeşidi Olarak İş Doyumu Örgütsel Davranış Boyutlarından Seçmeler’’, Ed. Mehmet TİKİCİ, Ankara,
  11. Nobel Yayını. Ellard, J. H., & Skarlicki, D. P. 2002, ‘‘A third-party observer’s reactions to employee mistreatment: Motivational and cognitive processes in deservingness assessments’’ In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), ‘‘Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice’’, Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishi