Journals / Maltepe Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

The Evaluation of Cervicovaginal Cytological Changes During Pregnancy

Gebelikte Servikovaginal Sitolojik Değişikliklerin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
38–46
Publication Date
2009-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, appliying the smear test on the women, not coming to the periodic smear follow-up but to the controlling of pregnancy, can give the opportunity for cervical screening these women.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cervical Cancer, being the primary cause of death of gynecologic cancer among women, can be reduced by effective screening programme.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method:144 pregnants' cervicovaginal smear results, having resorted to our Obstetcic Policlinic between 2006 and 2007, were examined by retrospective along with the parameters such as age, the pregnancy week, history and the number of pregnancy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, appliying the smear test on the women, not coming to the periodic smear follow-up but to the controlling of pregnancy, can give the opportunity for cervical screening these women.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gebeilk · servikovaginal sitoloji · Pregnancy

Abstract

Cervical Cancer, being the primary cause of death of gynecologic cancer among women, can be reduced by effective screening programme. Routine obstetrics visits are important opportunities to search through. To this purpose, we started our research to examine the application of pap smear test on the pregnants. Material and Method:144 pregnants' cervicovaginal smear results, having resorted to our Obstetcic Policlinic between 2006 and 2007, were examined by retrospective along with the parameters such as age, the pregnancy week, history and the number of pregnancy. We classified the smears in which patalogy was determined. 82 women at their reprodüctive age were taken into the controlling group. Results: The average age of pregnancy group was determined as 28.12 ± 0.45 and that of the controlling group was determined as 31.83 ± 0.56. That there was no increase in the frequency of encountering preinvasive lesion during the pregnancy period was determined. In all cases, there was no severe lesion than ASC-US atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance . While in the controlling group, 3 3.6% ASC-US was encountered, in the pregnancy group, no ASC-US was seen. The differences between them was not significant p=0,08 . That the infection ratio in the pregnancy group 28,1% increased expressively as to that in the controlling group 6,09% was reached p=0,0002 .Candida Infection was encountered the most frequently among the pregnants. While the smear results were evaluated as insufficient in two cases of the pregnancy group, there was no insufficient smear result in the controlling group. However, the differences between them was not significant p=0,738 . Conclusion: The effectivity of cervicovaginal citologic screening carried out during pregnancy was no different from that of non-pregnant group. For this reason, cervicovaginal smear was put into the regular pregnancy tests. Thus, appliying the smear test on the women, not coming to the periodic smear follow-up but to the controlling of pregnancy, can give the opportunity for cervical screening these women.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Kadınlarda jinekolojik kanserlerden ölüm nedenlerinin başında yer alan serviks kanseri etkin tarama programı ile azaltılabilmektedir. Rutin gebelik muayeneleri, tarama yapmak için önemli bir fırsattır. Bu amaçla gebelerde pap smear testinin uygulanabilirliğini araştırmak amacıyla çalışmamızı başlattık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kadın Doğum polikliniğimize 2006-2007 yılları arası başvuran 144 gebenin servikovaginal smear sonuçları retrospektif olarak yaş, gebelik haftası, özgeçmişteki hastalıkları, gebelik sayısı gibi bir dizi parametre ile birlikte incelendi. Patoloji tespit edilen smearleri gruplandırdık. Kontrol grubu olarak doğurganlık çağındaki gebe olmayan 82 kadın alındı. Bulgular: Gebe grubunun yaş ortalaması 28.12 ± 0.45, kontrol grubunun yaş ortalaması 31.83 ± 0.56 olarak saptanmıştır. Gebelik döneminde preinvazif lezyon görülme sıklığında artış olmadığı tesbit edildi. Tüm vakalarda ASC-US ‘dan “atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance” = anlamı belirlenemeyen atipik skuamöz hücreler daha ağır lezyon saptanmadı. Kontrol grubunda 3 %3.6 ASC-US görülürken, gebe grubunda hiç ASC-US saptanmadı. Aradaki fark anlamlı değildi p=0.08 . Gebe grubunda %28.1 kontrol grubuna %6.09 göre enfeksiyon oranı anlamlı olarak artmış bulundu p=0.0002 . Gebelerde en sık kandida enfeksiyonuna rastlandı. Gebe grubunda 2 vakada smear sonucu yetersiz olarak değerlendirilirken , kontrol grubunda yetersiz smear sonucu yoktu. Ancak aradaki fark anlamlı değildi p=0.738 . Sonuç: Gebelikte uygulanan servikovaginal sitolojik taramanın etkinliği, gebe olmayan gruptan farklı değildir. Bu nedenle servikovaginal smear rutin gebelik testleri arasına sokulmalıdır. Böylece peryodik smear takibine gelmeyen, ancak gebelik kontrollerine gelen kadın hastalardan smear alınması bu hastaların taranmasına fırsat verecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABALI, R., BOZKURT, H., AKSU, M., KOÇYILDIZ, Z., DURSUN, N. (2009). The Evaluation of Cervicovaginal Cytological Changes During Pregnancy. Maltepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 38–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/231068

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Shingleton HM, Thompson JD. Cancer of the cervix. In: John AR, Thompson JD, eds. Te Linde’s Operative Gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997. p.1413-500
  2. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108
  3. Jin XW, Cash J, Kennedy AW. Human papillomavirus typing and the reduction of cervical cancer risk. Cleveland Clin J Med 1999;66:533–539
  4. Boyle P and Ferlay J. Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Europe, 2004 Annals of Oncology 2005;16:481- 488
  5. Atasü T, Şahmay S, editörler. Jinekoloji. Serviksin malign hastalıkları
  6. Baskı. İstanbul: Logos; 2001. p.257-264
  7. Zemheri E, Koyuncuer A. Servikal kanserlerin erken tanısında pap testinin önemi. Sürekli Tıp Eğitim Dergisi 2005;14:4-8
  8. Berkman S, Ermiş H. Servikal intraepitalial neoplazi. Atasü T., Aydınlı K, editörler. Jinekolojik Onkoloji
  9. Baskı. İstanbul: Logos; 1999. p.239-260
  10. Sopracordevole F, Cadorin L, Muffato G, De Benetti L, Parin A. Papanicolau smear changes to be diagnostic for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) with or without detectable HPV DNA at in situ hybridization analysis. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1993;14:336-341
  11. Greening SE. Errors in cervical smears: minimizing the risk of medicolegal consequences. Monogr Pathol 1997;39:16-39
  12. McMeekin DS, McGonigle KF, Vasilev SA. Cervical cancer prevention: Toward cost-effective screening. Medscape womens health 1997;2(12):1
  13. Richart RM, Vaillant HW. Influence of cell collection techniques upon cytological diagnosis. Cancer 1965;18:1474-478
  14. Coppleson RM, LW, Brown B. Estimation of the screening error rate from the observed detection rates in repeated cervical cytology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974;119:953-958
  15. Korn AP. Management of abnormal cervical/vaginal pap smears. Medscape womens health 1996;1(3):1
  16. Ayinde AE, Adewde IF, Babarinsa IA. Trends in cervikal cancer screening in Ibadon, Nigeria: A four-year review. West Afr Med 1998:17;25-30
  17. Pisharodi LR, Jovanoska S. Spectrum of cytologic changes in pregnancy. A review of 100 abnormal cervicovaginal smears, with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Acta cytol 1995;39(5):905-908
  18. Pairwuti S. Pap smear examination in women with near-term pregnancy. J Med Assoc Thai 1991;74(3):156- 158
  19. Beziroğlu İ, Öniz A.Vajinal akıntı yakınması ile başvuran hastaların akıntı örneklerinin direk mikroskobik değerlendirilmesi. Sürekli Tıp Eğitim Dergisi 2004;13 (11):422
  20. Abalı R, Bozkurt