Journals / Maltepe Tıp Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

The relationship between negative appendectomy and gynecological pathologies in female patients

Kadın hastalarda negatif apendektomi ile jinekolojik patolojiler arasındaki ilişki

Pages
10–12
Publication Date
2011-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Negative appendectomy rates were statistically more common in females than in males p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The rate of acute appendicitis is rather than half of the acute abdominal pain and can be seen in all age groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed to present the rates and the treatment of gynecological pathologies in women who were operated with diagnosis of acute appendicitis but having normal appendix.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Negative appendectomy rates were statistically more common in females than in males p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:akut apendektomi · apendiks · jinekolojik patolojiler

Abstract

Objective: The rate of acute appendicitis is rather than half of the acute abdominal pain and can be seen in all age groups. It is more often in female patients because of the look likes of gynecological pathologies with acute appendicitis. In this study, we aimed to present the rates and the treatment of gynecological pathologies in women who were operated with diagnosis of acute appendicitis but having normal appendix. Material and methods: Between January 2008 and 2010, we retrospectively evaluated 420 patients who were operated with the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The patients were evaluated with physical examination, laboratory analysis and radiologic examinations. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis and gynecological pathology were made during the operation by macroscopic examination. Results: There were 260 61.9% male and 160 38.1% female patients. There were normal appendices in 28 6.6% patients peroperaitvely. In 28 negative appendectomy cases there were 19 females 67% . Negative appendectomy rates were statistically more common in females than in males p

Özet

Amaç: Akut apandisit her yaş grubunda görülebilen, erişkinde akut karın hastalıklarının yarısından fazlasını oluşturan bir hastalıktır. Kadın hastalarda jinekolojik patolojilerin akut apandisiti taklit etmesi nedeniyle bu oran daha da yükselmektedir. Bu çalışmada, akut apandisit ön tanısıyla ameliyat edilen ve normal apendiks saptadığımız kadın hastalarda tespit ettiğimiz jinekolojik patolojilerin tedavi yaklaşımlarını ve oranlarını sunmayı amaçladık. Yöntem: Ocak 2008 Ocak 2010 tarihleri arasında kliniğimize başvuran ve akut apandisit ön tanısıyla opere edilen 420 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların tanıları fizik muayene, laboratuar bulgular ve radyolojik bulgulara göre konulmuştur. Hastalarımızda peroperatif apendiksin durumu ve jinekolojik patoloji makroskobik olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Hastaların 260'ı %61,9 erkek, 160'ı %38,1 kadındı. Tüm hastaların 28'inde %6,6 ameliyat esnasında normal apendiks saptandı. Bu hastaların 19'u %67 kadındı. Negatif apendektomi oranı kadınlarda erkeklere göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir şekilde daha yüksekti p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİTGEZ, B., YETKİN, G., AKGÜN, İ., ULUDAĞ, M., VELİDEDEOĞLU, M., AKÇAKAYA, A. (2011). The relationship between negative appendectomy and gynecological pathologies in female patients. Maltepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 10–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/230996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Lally KP, Cox CS, Andrassy RJ. Appendix. In: Townsend CM (ed). Sabiston. Textbook Of Surgery. 16 th edition. Philadelphia: WB. Saunders; 2001. 916-927
  2. Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic corelates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch surg 2002; 137:799-804
  3. Blomqvist PG, Andersson RE, Granath F, Lambe MP,Ekbom AR. Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996. Ann Surg 2001; 233:455-460
  4. Seetahal SA, Bolorunduro OB, Sookdeo TC, Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample. Am J.Surg 2011; 201: 433-437
  5. Bilgin N. Akut apandisit. In: Sayek ‹ (ed). Temel Cerrahi. 3.bask›. Ankara: Günefl Kitapevi; 2004. 1191-1196
  6. Piper HG, Rusnak C, Orrom W, et al. Current management of appendicitis at a community center—how can we improve? Am J Surg 2008;195:585–588
  7. Velanovich V, Satava R. Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg 1992;58:264 –269
  8. Ma KW, Chia NH, Yeung HW, Cheung MT. If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies. Hong Kong Med J. 2010;16:12-17
  9. Nakgevery KB, Clarke LE. Acute appendicits in women of childbearing age. Arch Surg 1986. 121: 1053- 1055
  10. Gökçe AH, Aren A, Gökçe FS ve ark. Akut apandisitte ultrasonografinin güvenilirli¤i Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011;17:19-22
  11. Sitter H, Hoffmann S, Hassan I, Zielke A. Diagnostic score in appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Eskelinen score) in patients in whom acute appendicitis is suspected.Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004;389:213-218
  12. Saidi HS, Chavda SK. Use of a modified Alvorado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. East Afr Med J 2003;80:411-414
  13. Turan A, Kapan S, Kütükçü E, Yi¤itbafl E, Hatipo¤lu S, Aygün E. Comparison of operative and non operative managment of acut appendicitis. Ulusal Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2009;15:459-462.