Journals / Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3

The effects of furnished cages on the behaviour of laying hens in the post-stress adaptation period.

Pages
76–83
Publication Date
2017-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it would be beneficial to keep stress exposed hens in furnished cages in the post-stress adaptation period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to investigate whether housing laying hens in furnished cages in post-stress adaptation period causes any changes in behaviors or not.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to the affects of animal welfare on production performance, the relationship between behavioral changes and egg production has also been studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it would be beneficial to keep stress exposed hens in furnished cages in the post-stress adaptation period.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:laying hens · cage furnishing · animal welfare

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate whether housing laying hens in furnished cages in post-stress adaptation period causes any changes in behaviors or not. Due to the affects of animal welfare on production performance, the relationship between behavioral changes and egg production has also been studied. In the present study, 22 weeks old, 32 laying hens were used. The hens were subjected to transport. The transport procedure, including loading and unloading took 8 hours. Just after the transportation, birds were randomly divided into two groups as furnished and conventional cages; each consists of two subgroups with 8 hens. It was ensured that the hens in subgroups were unfamiliar with each other to induce social stress. On the top of each cage, a camera was fixed and continuous recording was done for 24 hours for 6 days. The behavior of animals was scored by time sampling method. Eating, drinking, resting, preening, wing flapping, tail-wagging, stretching, ground-scratching, gentle pecking, stereotyped and aggressive pecking behaviors were scored. In addition, the locations of the hens were also determined in furnished cages. Frequency of eating, drinking and ground-scratching behaviours significantly increased, but tail-wagging behaviour tended to increase in hens housed in furnished cages. On the other hand, resting, stretching and aggressive pecking behaviours significantly decreased in hens housed in furnished cages. In addition, the use of perch and nest rate in furnished cages significantly increased from the second day. In the conclusion, cage furnishing improves some comfort behaviour such as ground-scratching and tail wagging and decreasing aggressive pecking in laying hens. Therefore, it would be beneficial to keep stress exposed hens in furnished cages in the post-stress adaptation period.

Özet

The aim of the study is to investigate whether housing laying hens in furnished cages in post-stress adaptation period causes any changes in behaviors or not. The aim of the study is to investigate whether housing laying hens in furnished cages in post-stress adaptation period causes any changes in behaviors or not. Due to the affects of animal welfare on production performance, the relationship between behavioral changes and egg production has also been studied. In the present study, 22 weeks old, 32 laying hens were used. The hens were subjected to transport. The transport procedure, including loading and unloading took 8 hours. Just after the transportation, birds were randomly divided into two groups as furnished and conventional cages; each consists of two subgroups with 8 hens. It was ensured that the hens in subgroups were unfamiliar with each other to induce social stress. On the top of each cage, a camera was fixed and continuous recording was done for 24 hours for 6 days. The behavior of animals was scored by time sampling method. Eating, drinking, resting, preening, wing flapping, tail-wagging, stretching, ground-scratching, gentle pecking, stereotyped and aggressive pecking behaviors were scored. In addition, the locations of the hens were also determined in furnished cages. Frequency of eating, drinking and ground-scratching behaviours significantly increased, but tail-wagging behaviour tended to increase in hens housed in furnished cages. On the other hand, resting, stretching and aggressive pecking behaviours significantly decreased in hens housed in furnished cages. In addition, the use of perch and nest rate in furnished cages significantly increased from the second day. In the conclusion, cage furnishing improves some comfort behaviour such as ground-scratching and tail wagging and decreasing aggressive pecking in laying hens. Therefore, it would be beneficial to keep stress exposed hens in furnished cages in the post-stress adaptation period.

🔖

Cite This Article

Matur, E., Ekiz, E. E., AKYAZI, İ., ERASLAN, E., ERGEN, E., EREK, M., BOLAT, B. A., ÖZCAN, M. (2017). The effects of furnished cages on the behaviour of laying hens in the post-stress adaptation period.. Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3, 76–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/229702

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abrahamsson, P., & Tauson, R. (1997). Effects of group size on performance, health and birds’ use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A -Animal Science, 47, 254-260.
  2. Altan, O., Seremet, C., & Bayraktar, H. (2013). The effects of early environmental enrichment on performance, fear and physiological responses to acute stress of broiler. Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde, 77(1), 23-28.
  3. Appleby, M. C., Walker, A. W., Nicol, C. J., Lindberg, A. C., Freire, R., Hughes, B.O., & Elson, H. A. (2002). Development of furnished cages for laying hens, British Poultry Science, 43(4), 489-500.
  4. Broom, D. M., & Fraser, A. F. (2010). Domestic Animal Behaviour and Welfare, 5th Ed. London, UK: Cab International. Chang, J. B., Lusk, J. L., & Norwood, F. B. (2010). The price of happy hens: A hedonic analysis of retail egg prices. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 35(3) 406-423.
  5. Cheng, H. W, and Fahey A. (2009). Effects of group size and repeated social disruption on the serotonergic and dopaminergic systems in two genetic lines of White Leghorn laying hens. Poultry science, 88, 2018-2025.
  6. Daghir, N. J. (2008). Poultry production in hot climates. (2nd Ed.). Cab International, Cambridge. USA. Dawkins, M. S. (1999). The role of behaviour in the assessment of poultry welfare. World's poultry science journal, 55(03), 295-303.
  7. Duncan I. J. H. (1998). Behavior and Behavioral Needs. Poultry Science 77:1766-1772. Duncan I. J. H. 1980. The Ethogram of the Domesticated Hen. In Moss R ed. The laying hen and its environment. The Hague; Martinus Nijhoff Publisher.
  8. El-Lethey H., Aerni V., Jungi T.W., Wechsler B. 2000. Stress and feather pecking in laying hens in relation to housing conditions. Br Poult Sci. 41(1):22-28.
  9. Gamba, J. P., Rodrigues, M. M., Garcia Neto, M., Perri, S. H. V., Faria Júnior, M. D. A., & Pinto, M. F. (2015). The Strategic Application of Electrolyte Balance to Minimize Heat Stress in Broilers. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 17(2), 237-245.
  10. Harvey, S., Klandorf, H., & Pinchasov, Y. (1983). Visual and metabolic stimuli cause adrenocortical suppression in fasted chickens during refeeding. Neuroendocrinology, 37(1), 59-63.
  11. Hunter, R. R., Mitchell, M. A., & Carlisle, A. J. (1999). Wetting of broilers during cold weather transport: a major source of physiological stress?. British Poultry Science, 40(S1), 48-49.
  12. Huber-Eicher B, Wechsler B. 1998. The effect of quality and availability of foraging materials on feat