Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5

Türkiye'nin Trakya Bölgesindeki Barınak Köpeklerinde Kalp Kurdu Hastalığının Serolojik ve Moleküler Prevalansı

The Serologic and Molecular Prevalence of Heartworm Disease in Shelter Dogs in the Thrace Region of Turkey [1]

Pages
751–755
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This region is the transition point to Europe and obtained data in this study could contribute to the control of heartworm disease in the area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dirofilaria immitis is an important nematode of dogs and cats which causes fatal heartworm disease in their hosts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Blood samples were collected from 402 dogs in shelters which were located in four cities (Istanbul, Edirne, Tekirdag and Kirklareli) in this region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This region is the transition point to Europe and obtained data in this study could contribute to the control of heartworm disease in the area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Dirofilaria immitis is an important nematode of dogs and cats which causes fatal heartworm disease in their hosts. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of D. immitis by serologic and molecular methods in shelter dogs, in the Thrace Region of Turkey. Blood samples were collected from 402 dogs in shelters which were located in four cities (Istanbul, Edirne, Tekirdag and Kirklareli) in this region. The blood smears were examined for the presence of D. immitis microfilariae under the light microscope. The commercial Snap3Dx test kit and PCR assay for amplifying the ITS-2 gene region were used for the serological and molecular analyses, respectively. The serologic and molecular prevalence of D. immitis was determined as 6.7% and 2.7%, respectively. D. immitis microfilariae were also determined in the blood smears of three dogs (0.8%). The distribution of the infection according to the provinces was 14.7% in Edirne, 11% in Kirklareli, 1% in Tekirdag and 0% in Istanbul. The occult infection rate was determined as 59.3%. This study revealed the presence of D. immitis for the first time in the Thrace Region of Turkey. This region is the transition point to Europe and obtained data in this study could contribute to the control of heartworm disease in the area.

Özet

Dirofilaria immitis, konaklarında ölümcül Kalp Kurdu Hastalığı'na neden olan köpek ve kedilerin önemli bir nematodudur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'nin Trakya Bölgesi'ndeki barınak köpeklerinde D. immitis'in prevalansının serolojik ve moleküler yöntemlerle araştırılmasıdır. Kan örnekleri, bu bölgedeki dört şehirde (İstanbul, Edirne, Tekirdağ ve Kırklareli) lokalize olmuş barınaklardaki 402 köpekten alındı. Kan yaymaları D. immitis' in mikrofilerlerinin varlığı için ışık mikroskobu altında incelendi. Snap 3Dx test kiti ve ITS-2 gen bölgesini çoğaltmak için PCR yöntemi sırasıyla serolojik ve moleküler analizlerde kullanıldı. D. immitis'in serolojik ve moleküler prevalansı sırasıyla %6.7 ve %2.7 olarak belirlendi. Ayrıca 3 köpeğin kan yaymalarında D. immitis' in mikrofilerleri saptandı (%0.8). İllere göre enfeksiyonun dağılımı Edirne'de %14.7, Kırklareli'nde %11, Tekirdağ'da %1 ve İstanbul'da %0 olarak bulundu. Gizli enfeksiyon oranı %59.3 olarak saptandı. Bu çalışma D. immitis'in varlığını, Trakya Bölgesinde ilk kez ortaya koydu. Bu bölge Avrupa'ya geçiş noktası olup, bu çalışmada elde edilen veriler Kalp Kurdu Hastalığı'nın bölgedeki kontrolüne katkı sağlayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİNKAYA, H., AKYAZI, İ., ÖZKURT, M., MATUR, E. (2016). Türkiye'nin Trakya Bölgesindeki Barınak Köpeklerinde Kalp Kurdu Hastalığının Serolojik ve Moleküler Prevalansı. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5, 751–755. https://ajindex.com/articles/272431

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Morchon R, Carretón E, González-Miguel J, Mellado-Hernández I: Heartworm Disease (Dirofilaria immitis) and their vectors in Europe - New distribution trends. Front Physiol, 3, 196, 2012. DOI: 10.3389/ fphys.2012.00196 Yildirim A, Inci A, Duzlu O, Biskin Z, Ica A, Sahin I: Aedes vexans and Culex pipiens as the potential vectors of Dirofilaria immitis in Central Turkey. Vet Parasitol, 178, 143-147, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.12.023 Bowman DD, Atkins CE: Heartworm biology, treatment, and control. Vet Clin North Am: Small Anim Pract, 39, 1127-1158, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j. cvsm.2009.06.003 Rawlings CA, Dawe DL, McCall JW, Keith JC, Prestwood AK: Four types of occult Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc, (11): 1323-1326, 1982.
  2. Genchi C, Venco L, Genchi M: Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of canine and feline Dirofilaria infections. In, Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G (Eds): Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens in Dog and Cat and Human Infections. 137-144,
  3. Rolando Editore, Italy, 2007.
  4. Mar PH, Yang IC, Chang GN, Fei AC: Specific polymerase chain reaction for differential diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis and Dipetalonema reconditum using primers derived from internal transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2). Vet Parasitol, 106, 243-252, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0304- (02)00032-8
  5. Rishniw M, Barr SC, Simpson KW, Frongillo MF, Franz M, Dominguez Alpizar JL: Discrimination between six species of canine microfilariae by a single polymerase chain reaction. Vet Parasitol, 135, 303-314, 2006. DOI: 1016/j.vetpar.2005.10.013 Kartashev V, Batashova I, Kartashov S, Ermakov A, Mironova A, Kuleshova Y, Ilyasov B, Kolodiy I, Klyuchnikov A, Ryabikina E, Babicheva M, Levchenko Y, Pavlova R, Pantchev N, Morchon R, Simón F: Canine and human dirofilariosis in the rostov region (southern Russia). Vet Med Int, 2011 (2011), Article ID: 685713, 2011. DOI: 10.4061/ /685713 Oi M, Yoshikawa S, Ichikawa Y, Nakagaki K, Matsumoto J, Nogami S: Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis among shelter dogs in Tokyo, Japan, after a decade: Comparison of 1999-2001 and 2009-2011. Parasite, 21, 10, DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2014008 Sun M, Zhuo W, Guo S, Liao S, Shi D, Liu J, Cheng Z, Liu Y, Niu X, Wang S, Yang D: Serological survey of canine dirofilariosis in Chongqing, Kunming, Nanchang, Fuzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Nanning in Southern China. Vet Parasitol, 185, 225-228, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar. 09.035 Pantchev N, Schaper R, Limousin S, Norden N, Weise M, Lorentzen L: Occurrence of Diro